La lecture en ligne est gratuite
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
Télécharger Lire

WL.EBR.comment.on.mining.act

De
2 pages
October 15, 2008Mining Act Modernization ConsultationsMinistry of Northern Development and MinesDeput y Minister's Of ficeCorporate Polic y Secretariat99 Wellesley Street West Suite 5630Whitney BlockToronto On tarioM7A 1W 3 Dear Sir/Madame,RE: Comments regarding Modernizing On tario’s Mining Act (EBR Registry Number: 010-4327)Wildlands League welcomes the opportunity to provide com ments on O ntario’s Mining Act so that proposed changes re flect modern day values associated wi th our public lands, alleviates land- use conflicts, and protects the public interes t. Ontario’s fr ee entry regime (fo r acquiring ti tle to Crow n owned minerals) has been in place since 1906 and wa s c reated as a means t o increase settlement in ‘frontier lands’. T his regime has been highly criticized (by First Nations, the Environmental Commissioner of On tario, conservation g roups, private land owners, ne wspaper editorial boards and others) for its complete lack of consideration o f Aboriginal interes ts, important ecological values, private surface interes ts and other values associated with lands prior t o the commencement o f mining activities. Comprehensive Land use planning prior to any mining activities – including prospecting and exploration – is t he solution to avoiding most conflicts arising from dif fering land use needs in Ontario. Certainty o f land use provides all land users with the security they need for maintaining culture and community, ...
Voir plus Voir moins
October 15, 2008
Mining Act Modernization Consultations
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Deputy Minister's Office
Corporate Policy Secretariat
99 Wellesley Street West
Suite 5630
Whitney Block
Toronto Ontario
M7A 1W3
Dear Sir/Madame,
RE: Comments regarding Modernizing Ontario’s Mining Act
(EBR Registry Number:
010-4327)
Wildlands League welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on Ontario’s
Mining Act
so
that proposed changes reflect modern day values associated with our public lands, alleviates
land-use conflicts, and protects the public interest.
Ontario’s free entry regime (for acquiring title to Crown owned minerals) has been in place since
1906 and was created as a means to increase settlement in ‘frontier lands’. This regime has
been highly criticized (by First Nations, the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario,
conservation groups, private land owners, newspaper editorial boards and others) for its
complete lack of consideration of Aboriginal interests, important ecological values, private
surface interests and other values associated with lands prior to the commencement of mining
activities.
Comprehensive Land use planning prior to any mining activities – including prospecting and
exploration – is the solution to avoiding most conflicts arising from differing land use needs in
Ontario. Certainty of land use provides all land users with the security they need for maintaining
culture and community, ensuring protection of environmentally sensitive lands, increasing
economic opportunities, and improving the investment climate.
Therefore, Wildlands League supports the alternative regulatory framework (to the free entry
system) devised by CIELAP and Ecojustice titled,
Balancing Needs and Minimizing Conflict:
A Proposal for a
Mining Modernization Act
, 2008.
We urge the province to use this model
legislation when drafting new mining legislation for the province.
Below we summarize the principles needed in an amended
Mining Act.
They form the basis for
the alternative regulatory framework to the free entry system:
1. Land use planning mechanisms that include a pause on mining activities until a
comprehensive land use plan is in place;
2. Environmental assessment at each stage of the mining cycle;
3.
Protection for Aboriginal rights, including rights to consultation, accommodation, and free
prior and informed consent;
4. Increased regulatory oversight of mining activities and operations;
5. Increased rights for surface rights only landowners;
6. Increased transparency of mining operations, including public notice, consultation and
reporting;
7. Financial securities for 100% of clean-up and reclamation costs; and
8. A self-funded regulatory scheme.
For a full description of the required acccompanying legislative changes, please see
Balancing
Needs and Minimizing Conflict: A Proposal for a
Mining Modernization Act
, 2008.
Further comments:
In the review of the
Mining Act
, MNDM has made it clear that the review process supports
Premier Dalton McGuinty’s July 14, 2008 Far North Planning announcement. We also support
Premier McGuinty’s Far North Planning Announcement and strongly urge the province to make
sure that the upcoming Far North or Boreal legislation supersedes the
Mining Act. A
ny
subsequent changes to the
Mining Act
must not undermine the Premier’s Far North
Commitment. There is a serious risk to the integrity of the Premier’s Far North Announcement,
if the provincial government maintains its ‘free entry regime’ in Ontario.
The Premier said land use plans, developed in agreement with the local First Nations, would
precede the opening of mines in the Northern Boreal Forest. This is an important policy change.
For the first time in Ontario, First Nation consent through land use plans would be needed
before mine development could proceed in the area known as the ‘far north’ of Ontario. In
addition, in order to protect the integrity of the Premier’s announcement, it is vital that
prospecting, exploration or mining
not occur on the traditional territory of an Aboriginal People
absent the Free, Prior and Informed Consent of such Aboriginal People (this needs to happen in
the far north and throughout the province). Further, consent must be obtained in writing by the
Minister of Northern Development and Mines and must be provided by those authorized by the
Aboriginal People to enter into an agreement with the Minister.
Regional land use planning must be implemented prior to allowing e
xploration or mining
operations to proceed to ensure environmental, social and development needs are balanced. Finally, all
exploration and mining projects must face the scrutiny of environmental assessment to ensure that
environmental and socio-economic impacts are minimized.
Sincerely,
Anna Baggio
Director, Conservation Land Use Planning
CPAWS Wildlands League
Un pour Un
Permettre à tous d'accéder à la lecture
Pour chaque accès à la bibliothèque, YouScribe donne un accès à une personne dans le besoin