Cet ouvrage fait partie de la bibliothèque YouScribe
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le lire en ligne
En savoir plus

Identifying the Best: The CHE ExcellenceRanking 2010 Working Paper ...

De
52 pages

Identifying the Best: The CHE ExcellenceRanking 2010 Working Paper ...

Publié par :
Ajouté le : 21 juillet 2011
Lecture(s) : 0
Signaler un abus
      
 
  
       
 
Working Paper No 137 October 2010
Identifying the Best: The CHE ExcellenceRanking 2010
Sonja Berghoff Uwe Brandenburg Diane Carr-Boulay Cort-Denis Hachmeister Hannah Leichsenring Frank Ziegele
      
 
CHE Centre for Higher Education Development gGmbH Verler Str. 6 D-33332 Gütersloh  Telephone: ++49 (0) 5241 97 61 0 Telefax: ++49 (0) 5241 9761 40 E-Mail:info@che.de Internet:www.che.de     ISSN 1862-7188 ISBN 978-3-941927-07-0  
     
 
 
 Working Paper No 137 October 2010 
Identifying the Best: The CHE ExcellenceRanking 2010
Sonja Berghoff Uwe Brandenburg Diane Carr-Boulay Cort-Denis Hachmeister Hannah Leichsenring Frank Ziegele   
 
| Page 1
Abstract The CHE Centre for Higher Education Development has designed an “ExcellenceRanking”, a ranking of a selected group of European Universities. The CHE applied a two-step approach for analysis. First, all European departments in the surveyed fields were compared by a few general indicators. Second, for those departments that excelled in these indicators, an in-depth analysis was run based on an institutional questionnaire and a student survey.  The first issue of the ranking, released in 2007, concentrated on the natural sciences and mathematics. The second issue, released in 2009, was dedicated to economics, political science and psychology. In 2010, the study was repeated for the natural sciences. This paper covers the results from the 2009 and 2010 issues.   
 
 
| Page 2
Table of contents 1 Genesis and Philosophy.............................................................................................5 2 Target Groups ............................................................................................................6 3  .....................................................................................................7Basic Methodology 3.1 ction ..Presele............................................................................................................ 7.. 3.2 In-Depth Analysis .....................................................................................................11 4 Results of the Preselection.......................................................................................13 4.1 Country level ............................................................................................................13 4.2 Findings on the University Level ..............................................................................15 4.2.1 Distribution of Excellence Group Placements across Universities ...........................15 4.3 Findings for the Single Subjects ...............................................................................21 4.3.1 Biology (2010) ..........................................................................................................21 4.3.2 Chemistry (2010) ......................................................................................................24 4.3.3 Economics (2009) ....................................................................................................26 4.3.4 Mathematics (2010)..................................................................................................30 4.3.5 Physics (2010)..........................................................................................................32 4.3.6  ............................................................................................36Political Science (2009) 4.3.7 Psychology (2009)....................................................................................................39 5  ..............................................................................41Results of the In-Depth-Analysis 5.1  ...................................................................................................41Institutional Survey 5.1.1 Proportion of International Staff and Students .........................................................42 5.1.2 Proportion of Female Staff and Students .................................................................43 5.2 Students’ Judgements ..............................................................................................43 6 References ...............................................................................................................48    
 
 
Un pour Un
Permettre à tous d'accéder à la lecture
Pour chaque accès à la bibliothèque, YouScribe donne un accès à une personne dans le besoin