Cyfra 21-1 as a serum tumor marker for follow-up of patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [Elektronische Ressource] / vorgelegt von Hani Al-Shagahin
Aus dem Zentrum für Hals, Nasen und Ohrenheilkunde Geschäftsführender Direktor: Prof. Dr. J. A. Werner des Fachbereichs Medizin der PhilippsUniversität Marburg in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH Standort Marburg Cyfra 21-1 as a Serum Tumor Marker for Follow-up of Patients with Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Inaugural-Disseration zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der gesamten Humanmedizin aus dem Fachbereich Medizin der PhilippsUniversität Marburg vorgelegt von Hani AL-Shagahin aus Faqqw/Jordanien Marburg 2009 1 Angenommen vom Fachbereich Medizin der PhilippsUniversität Marburg am: 16.12.2009 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung des Fachbereichs Dekan: Prof. Dr. med. M. Rothmund Referent: Prof. Dr. med. J. A. Korreferent: Prof. Dr. med. EngenhartCabillic 2 Für meine Familie 3 Contents Page 1. Introduction 5 2. Questions 8 3. Patients and Methods 9 4. Results 14 5. Discussions 34 5.1 Followup of Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma 34 5.2 Serum Tumor Markers in Head and Neck Cancer 38 5.2.1 Serum Cytokeratin Fragments 46 5.3 Cyfra 211 as a Serum Tumor Marker in Head and Neck Cancer 53 6. Summary 58 7.
Aus dem Zentrum für Hals, Nasen und Ohrenheilkunde Geschäftsführender Direktor: Prof. Dr. J. A. Werner des Fachbereichs Medizin der PhilippsUniversität Marburg in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH Standort Marburg !
"# zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der gesamten Humanmedizin aus dem Fachbereich Medizin der PhilippsUniversität Marburg vorgelegt von $ aus Faqqw/Jordanien Marburg 2009
1
Angenommen vom Fachbereich Medizin der PhilippsUniversität Marburg
am: 16.12.2009
Gedruckt mit Genehmigung des Fachbereichs
Dekan: Prof. Dr. med. M. Rothmund
Referent: Prof. Dr. med. J. A.
Korreferent: Prof. Dr. med. EngenhartCabillic
2
Für meine Familie
3
Page 1. Introduction 5
2. Questions
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussions 5.1 Followup of Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
5.2 Serum Tumor Markers in Head and Neck Cancer
5.2.1 Serum Cytokeratin Fragments
5.3 Cyfra 211 as a Serum Tumor Marker in Head and Neck Cancer
6. Summary
7. References
8
9
14
34 34
38
46
53
58
60
4
% "!
Head and neck cancer is a broad definition that covers a range of tumors which arise from the epithelial lining of a number of sites in the upper aerodigestive tract. The most common sites of disease are the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx and nasopharynx. About 90% of the lesions are squamous cell carcinomas. Globally, cancers of the head and neck account for over 5% of malignancies; with more than 500,000 new cases worldwide and over 300,000 attributable deaths recorded in 2002 [1].
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are rapidly proliferating tumors. Following the treatment of early stage disease, the most frequent disease related event is the development of a second primary tumor. In advanced disease, local or distant recurrence is common and represented the most common cause of death (45%), followed by comorbidity (21%), treatment related complications (15%) and second primary tumors (9%) [2].
Despite improvement in diagnosis and management, the long term survival rates are among the lowest compared with the major cancers, although for the last 30 years they have almost stay constant [3]. Therefore, effective treatment planning would be enhanced by identification of new prognostic indicators that more accurately reflect the biological behavior of a particular tumor in relation to its host [4]. In this respect, extensive investigation of the prognostic importance of a variety of immunological and histological characteristics of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma has been done in an attempt to identify those features associated with aggressive biological behavior [5].
Generally, distant metastases of carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract present with nonspecific clinical symptoms, so the detection of distant metastases is difficult. Finding a tumor marker for prediction of impending appearance of distant metastases would lead to better utilization of clinical staging procedures like CT scans, ultrasound, etc. Early detection of tumor progression provides more options for therapy and survival [6].
Serum tumor markers have been accepted as valuable tools for prognosis, and treatment monitoring over the last two decades. Various serum tumor markers such as squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCAg), Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), 5
lipid associated sialic acid, SCC marker (TA4), serum intercellular adhesion molecule1(SICAM1) etc. have been examined for their value in detecting head and neck cancers. However, due to their low sensitivity, these markers are not clinically useful in HNSCC [6, 7].
Cytokeratins (CK), belonging to the intermediate filament (IF) family of proteins are particularly useful tools for diagnosis in oncology. At present, at least 37 different human CK have been identified of which CK 8, 18, and 19 are the most abundant in simple epithelial cells [8].
CK are subgroubed into type I (4056.5 kDa) and type II (5367kDa) CK. Type I are acidic while type II are basic CK, depending on their tissue expression pattern, they have been grouped into simple epithelia specific CK (CK7, 8, 18, 19, 20) and stratified epithelia specific CK (CK4, 5, 13, 14, etc.) [8].
It has been observed that when malignant cells disintegrate, partially degraded CK fragments are released in circulation and can be quantified using various commercially available specific serological assays. The levels of serum markers reflect the tumor burden and are not sensitive enough to be used for screening and early diagnosis of primary cancer. By contrast, the role of serum tumor markers is established in the diagnosis of recurrent disease and in the evaluation of response to treatment [9].
The three most frequently used CK which are being evaluated as serum markers for their utility in clinical applications are tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS), and Cytokeratine fragments 211 (Cyfra 211). Assays for TPA measure CK 8, 18, and 19 and assays for TPS and Cyfra 211 are more specific and measure CK 18 and CK 19 levels, respectively [10].
Cytokeratins are intermediate filaments expressed by all epithelialcells and which appear to be useful markers of epithelial differentiation.Cyfra 211 measures cytokeratin fragments of cytokeratin19 with the aid of two specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): BM 19.21 as the capture mAb and KS 19.1 as the detector mAb. Thesites for the Cyfra 211 mAbs lie within amino acids 346–367target for BM 19.21 and within amino acids 311–335 for KS 19.1. Cytokeratin19 consists of 400 amino acids; thus both epitopes are locatedin the Cterminal helical region of the molecule. 6
SerumCyfra 211 has been used as a tumor marker for the diagnosisof malignancies of different origin [9].
Cytokeratin fraction 211 (Cyfra 211) is a well accepted tumor marker with high sensitivity and specificity in nonsmallcell lung cancer, especially squamous cell carcinoma (independent prognostic factor) [11]. In SCCHN, the clinical value of Cyfra 211 as a tumor marker has been debated inconclusively, probably due to difficulties in finding the appropriate cutoff level [12].
Cyfra 211 serum levels in patients with head and neck cancer are generally lower than in patients with lung cancer and they are often even equivalent to levels which are considered normal in lung cancer patients. Cytokeratins are not organ specific, and they appear in all epithelial tumors, as well as in normal epithelium. This is a limitation on the tumor marker potential of Cyfra 211 [13, 14].
The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of Cyfra 211 at the time of initial diagnosis and its potential as a tumor marker for follow up of patients with squamous cell carcinoma in two major subsites of the head and neck (laryngeal and hypopharyngeal tumors), without determination of a certain cutoff level. Instead, repeated testing Cyfra 211 during management and to compare Cyfra 211 levels at the time of initial diagnosis with subsequent levels (posttherapy, followup) to detect abrupt rise in the serum levels.