GIBLIN, ANNE E., GENE E. LIKENS, AND ROBERT W. HOWARTH. A reply to the comment by Stauffer

Description

1 0 199 199 1, 1, 27 A. E., E. W. 1990. Lim- 35: 852-869. P., 1986. V. 3. EPA! 600/4-86/007c. A., 1987. 3: 40. A., 1986. V. 1. S. S. OWEN, S. A. 1988. We 157: 219-229. S. A. 1989. p. 0 1.1n -, S. 1988. 39: W. A. A. 1986. 31: 128 1. B., S. E. 1985. 1988. p. 345-366. In E. An 331: 607-609. 1265-l of We We We We We We Submitted: 26 199 1. February l the in concentrations SO, changing that evidence strong is there believe iments. sed- lake recent in S in increase consistent S distinguish not does Stauffer discussion, and widespread a for evidence no is there his In water. overlying the in concentrations SO4 by affected is sediments lake in storage because storage S control not do water lying over- the in concentrations SO, that First, S that concept the rejecting in far too much points. Stauffer’s of three address here goes he that believe we However, sediments. sediments. the to delivery C organic in storage S regulating factor one is ments to addition in sediments in concentrations sedi- to delivery C organic that agree also Fe and water overlying the in centrations 1). 199 al. et (Kling overturn after lost be con- 0, and SO, including factors several can lakes some in sediments hypolimnetic in stored sulfur the of Much budgets. nual consider to needs sediments in storage S of model complete a that argue burial. an- to extrapolate to peepers, from tained C organic and storage S between relation ob- as such data, ...

Informations

• Publié par: Methong
• Nombre de lectures: 23
• Langue: English

Extrait