La lecture en ligne est gratuite
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
Télécharger Lire

Modelling categorical covariates in Bayesian disease mapping by partition structures

De
29 pages

Giudici, Knorr Held, Rasser:Modelling categorical covariates in Bayesian diseasemapping by partition structuresSonderforschungsbereich 386, Paper 152 (1999)Online unter: http://epub.ub.uni muenchen.de ...

Publié par :
Ajouté le : 24 septembre 2011
Lecture(s) : 0
Signaler un abus

Vous aimerez aussi

Giudici, Knorr Held, Rasser:
Modelling categorical covariates in Bayesian disease
mapping by partition structures
Sonderforschungsbereich 386, Paper 152 (1999)
Online unter: http://epub.ub.uni muenchen.de/
Projektpartneresian
Quan
Univ
via
Via
San
G
ter
of
Univ
M
P
mapping
a
b
hen
y
y
partition
Leonhard
structures
in
P
ariates
aolo

Giudici
via
Dipartimen
and
to
unc
di
h
Economia
Mo
P
v
olitica
German
e
I
Meto
a
di
Italy
categorical
Knorreld
titativi
y
delling
Ba
co
Institute
disease
Statistics
D

y
y


Ludwigstr
P
F
April
Munic
of
ersit
Rar
un
elice
of
ersittw
ed
o
c
Mark
te
is
In
for
ha
in
esian
and
be
tc
o
co
remo
for
ev
aim
the
in
com
the
not
to
but
to
the
and
i
co
nformation
v
on
laten
p
e
o
in
ten
structure
tial
a
risk
ould
factors
i
T
e
o
r
a
ma
nalyse
s
this
observe
problem
s
from
oal
a
t
B
norreld
a
n
y
incomplete
esian
o
viewp
exp
oin
ologies
a
h
e
v
p
can
rop
u
ose
ariates
a
ariates
m
e
etho
see
dology
t

tatistical
w
include
hic
th
h
co
extends
spatial
a
t
s
F
patial
i
partition
imprecise
m
imp
o
h
d
m
el
presen
b
t
y
orate
i
to
ncluding
y
categorical
in
c
a
o
priori
v
seen
ariate
urrogates
information
ed
Suc
c
h
inclusion
an
gional
extension
ected
a
has
llo
recognized
ws
ery
to
Cla
detect

clusters
ultimate
in
f
the
mapping
r
e
esidual
relev
v
factors
ariation
re
recting
need
further
ariate
p
Besag
os
series
sibly
p
u
i
nobserv
p

if
risk
often
the
is
v
v
ariates
it
The
v
metho
t
dology
nsert
is
prop
implemen
the
ted
d
b
of
y
pap
m
to
eans
metho
of
to
rev
only
ersible
ariates
jump
of
mapping
ma
o
or
v
y
c
ha
hain
e
Mon
spatial
of
a
Carlo
of
sampling
ts
An
a
application
s
problem
for
presen
nobserv
ted
or
in
oun
order
v
to
The
illustrate
of
a
d
nd
v
compare
in
our
h
prop
nalyses
osed
b
e
en
xtensions
a
with
v
a
crucial
p
e
urely
yton
s
Bernardinelli
patial
Indeed
partition
he
mo
g
del
o
Here
s
w
disease
e
w
a
b
nalyse
to
a
all
w
an
ellno
causal
wn
and
dataset
clusters
o
v
n
the
l
of
ip
v
cancer
surrogates
incidence
and
in

Scotland
w
the
er
tro
n
d
ractice
uction
his
Statistical
s
metho
ot
d
ossible
s
urthermore
consider
a
analysing
ailable
and
suc
h
geographical
nformation
v
either
ariation
or
of
ery
disease
so
rates
b
e
comes
v
ery
e
ortan
receiv
t
ed
i
increasing
suc
in
information
terest
erly
W
to
the
statistical
recen
o
t
el
literature
a
to
using
y
t
Abstract
e
maps
is
e
presen
ose
xible
and
d
ed
suited
observ
incorp
ypically
information
in
categorical
tro
v
cases
disease
Ba
esian
y
uce
analysis
parameters
disease
clusters
W
approac
prop
hes
to
according
bine
this
data
problem
t
d
also
in
on
The
Ho
us
suc
not
whic
to
Ba
the
fromed
po
e
n
t
to
maps
can
be
eral
that
is
aim
of
suc
co
an
prop
osed
relev
in
be
e
n
er
are
eac
be
r
um
ratios
for
the
be
r
the
be
r
SMR
be
t
dataset
e
lip
w
standard
a
short
ys
b
Our
some
sp
sev
eciation
a
i
eac
s
or
a
t
natural
in
generalization
the
of
aldor
an
ill
approac
m
h
regions
p
c
rop
h
osed
Figure
in
simply
Knorreld
W
and
p
Rasser
The
a
w
co
diren
w
Cla
restrictiv
d
w
spatial
the
v
en
ariation
implemen
less
b
with
disease
tial
the
region
Basically
ed
their
en
mo
n
del
b
assumes
yton
that
m
the
h
area
mo
considered
v
of
close
order
ts
partitioned
ssible
i

n
The
ary
example
sev
wn

and
clusters
factor
t
times
accoun
and
sets
in
of
it
con
explanatory
tiguous
o
regions
ata
where
e
v
this
h
t
cluster
of
or
d
w
constan
describ
t
observ
relativ
Scotland
e

risk
or
Our
n
to
um
the
exp
to
is
adjust
n
that
rs
spatial
presen
risk
but
surface
found
f
in
or
Bernardinelli
categorical
ws
c
of
o
observ
v
b
ariates
categories
W
an
e
y
compare
ariate
t
e
he
with
risk
commen
estimates
and
with
o
and
extensions
without
Section
inclusion

in
dataset
taking
Scotland
h
cancer
duced
b
v
ellno
ariates
t
cases
literature
plan
cases
of
Three
the
analysed
p
eral
ap
since
er
yton
is
K
as

follo
tro
ws
uced
Section
Ho

ev
i
a
n
ed
tro
f
duces
d
the
w
Scotland
b
lip
giv
c
in
ancer
section
dataset
s
with
he
emphasis
tation
ected
our
exp
o
relev
els
tro
ill
t
e
details
ed
of
reference
our
this
application
ariate
Section
there

n
sp

ecis
F
more
h
h
in
the
are
v
mo
of
del
observ
Section
and

ected
giv
ases
es
giv
some
These
details

on
e
the
are
i
ot
mplemen
ted
tation
ere
dels
can
n
e
describ
f
e
instance
s
Cla
results
and
from

sev
sho
eral
a
analyses
ap
in
the
y
mortalit
MR

the
calculated
Scotland
eac
dataset
region
n
y
and
dividing
without
Section

a
and
een
Note
um
of
of
um
In
to
summary
has
is
co
with
of
the
for
the
on
The
the
is
has
eac
to
in
del
mo
the
els
levThis


m
suc
pe
e
r
c
n
nd
exp
ected
of
The
be
r
in
to
as
ted


of
the
agr
of
be
alues
of

v
yton
and
for
e
brevit
for
y
SMR
Cla
r
m
e

t

the
categories
rt
with
c
lev
E
in
not
L
lso
l
susp

risk
l
hat
ariate
also
v
d
co
L


In
ot
T
the
able
o
for
within
eac
tiguous
h

category
geographical
en
v
h
e
Bernardinelli
a
is
cancer
forestry
L
and
l
hing
basic
tage
this

categories
L
f
l


b
is

a
that
wn
are
a

long
ect
with
ected
the
nor
S
he
MR
the
calculated
categories
b
cally
y
can
s
from
umming
h
up
ys
the
ariation
observ

ed
information

to
Y
to
l
xp

no
a
for
agriculture
with
in
o
ed


higher
E
our
l
e

cancer
cases
osed
y
The
Figure
the
regions
T
within
i
eac
supp
h
Inciden
category
v
l
seem

not
emplo
v

n

um
note
pulation
the
o
ategories
of
n
regions
homogeneous
p
ith
one
esp
category
to

exp
referred
cases
and
l
tage
t
the
t
size
size
of
furthermore
the
regions
category
the

are
is
geographi
also
con
presen
as
ercen
b
Category
seen
L
Figure
l
whic
Y
a
l
displa
E
the
l
v
ee
eac
s
SMR



ariate
p
is



ected

b

related

sunligh

e

osure

k

wn

factor

lip

so


higher

alues

f

l

t

is


category

in

notation

relativ

risk

lip

is

supp

to

higher

crude


within
region
six

in
h
able

o
e
n
h
act
istrict
o
are
this
hosen
tally
appro
the
cen
Besides
of
l
i
to
terv
e

the

xact

alues


for

ac
T
d
able
but

c
Categories
as
f
ximate
or
ters
the
underlying
S
n
cotland
als
lip

c

ancer

data

F




able
w

agr
co
The
T
rom






Size
SMR
all
sho
els
has
agr
giv
of
thend
Cla
is
supp
osed
be
on
This
tial
risk
has
tages
also
be
n
i
less
form
t
be
r
eg


n
estigation
is
the
risk
in
be


y
en





ecomp
sition
of
the
as


n

ab
o
er
s
ki
i
n
and
comp
onen
no
the
comp
onen
will
b
e
that
f
dard
y
in
Platt
epidemiology
e
and
comp
la
y
certain
v
adv

an
ts
C
i
in
lik


terpretation
i

del
e
w
i
ev
linear
is
l
it
b
migh
a
t
paradigm

Regarding
yton
f
a
n
w
i
teresting

t
o
o
n
allo
ose
w
dinelli
f
relativ
or
i
deviations
i
from
v
l
relativ
inearit
w
y
b

t
In

our
the
mo
wing
dels

w
b
e
brie
therefore
o
refrain
L
from

this
i
assumption
i
and
y
prop

ose
i
sev

eral
nclude
Breslo
information
restrictiv
he
e
e
e
m
ulations
soalled

e
The

prop
ws
osed

mo

del

Let

y
Mon
i
e
and
t
e

i
to
represen
comp
ee
h
resp
assumed
ectiv
indep
ely
sp

t
assumption

observ
ovariate
ed

main
F
the
y
exp
e
ected
describ
n
distribution

and
ataset
leads
d
the
of
eliho
ev
d
en
unction
ts

his
j
deaths
onen
o
Y
r
exp
illnesses
e
in

a

certain
i
region
i
i
exp

e
for

i

t
T
f
i
o
co

ariate
The
i
target
t
of
mo
our
w
i
prop
n
a
v
ultiplicativ
nalyses
d
a
o
former
risk
unkno
relativ
wn
risk
relativ
i
e
follo
In



i



region

i
i


Observ
log
ations
and
y
The
i
to
are
e
assumed
quation
to
actorizes
tomoli
he
realizations
tomoli
from
B
a
L
P
t
oisson
o
distribution
onen
with
whic
mean
will
e
e
i
to

e
i
enden

a
Conditional
atial
i
onen
ndep

endence
i
of
of
resp
c
onses
inence

t
spatial

onen

w
ollo
apply
recalled
is
metho
esian
and
w
a
shall
c
w

e
e
prior

for
relativ
oth
onstant
Leroux
i
n

y
comp
Mon
t
y
e
w
the
reslo
d
h
Knorreld
n
Rasser

giv
to
is
The
whic
of
the
ts
Ba
the
um
and
the
er
Ho
in
stan
del
mo
the
Bernar
yton

k
More

be
r

n
are

z
eac
the

z
the
be
t
as
the
be
r
be
from
the
be
r
of

n
be
as
or
a
iv
g
w
hv
ters
Pr


LN

or
an
for
IG
yc
o
en
o
wi
n

n
cen
This
erparameters
r

e
isk
of
estimates
clusters

k

is
j
treated
is
as
our
unkno
v
wn
C
with
onen
k
tly

ariance
f
Both
relativ
uniform
t
prop
g
with


The
some
clusters
W
constan

deed
has
b
j
y
n
marking
k
k
one
randomly
l
els
mean
wn
that
regions
e
as
are
soalled
e
cluster
whole
cen
highly
ters
erse
z
i
ith
for
w

k
this

el
Assigning
for
regions
e
h
comp
of
e
of
of
remaining
Z
regions
probabilit
to
Z
the

earest
k
cluster

cen
c
ter

leads
k
to
indep
a
priori
unique

cluster
distributed
c
of
onur

ation



lev

en
yp
Z
random
k


e

on
z
line
partition

a
ersed
k
in

distribution
distinct


o
distance
v
j
h

t
w
including
een
v
t
b
w
o
o
giving
regions
a
is
t
deed
the
j

C
formally
minimal
t
n
o
m
c
clusters
ector
dees
cluster
of
j
b
k
o
ategorical
undaries
y
in

ha
k
v
k
e

to
n
This

crossed

to
Comp
ed
ts
v

e

regions

one
i
to

observ
treated
other
enden
W
a
e
with
s
og
w
j
sp
normally
ecify
with
i

prior
v
distributions

for

the
is
unkno
j
h
for
parameters
cts
F

or

tiguous
h
n
erparameters
um
also
con
F
more

or
w
clusters
tak
k

w
prior
e
the
apply
real
a
and
uniform

distribution
a
on
disp
f
the
one
er
of
v
g
gamma
in
that
whic

pap

er
consider
Other

c
suitable
hoices
alues
ma
the
y
yp
also
a
set
b
appropriate
Without
for
an
example

a
ariate
geometric
will
distribution
e
a
m
thoroughly
d
discussed

in
in
Knorreld
sense
and
reference

comparing
tro
he
uce
of
ur
relativ
osed
risks
mo

for

c

v
Rasser
d
b
o
F
prop
er
prior
v
del

the
o
o
ariate
ariate
k
onen
j
W
e
e
equal
assume
and
b
a
but


and
are
of
ac
that
assume
en
this
wn
the
no
the
mo
that
um
Here
giv
dra
um
The

Un pour Un
Permettre à tous d'accéder à la lecture
Pour chaque accès à la bibliothèque, YouScribe donne un accès à une personne dans le besoin