MOGUL: I
17 pages
Français
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
17 pages
Français
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

Description

advantage in intercollegiate sports.37. The NCAA deregulation proposals derived from frequent ...... /www.ncaa.org/news/1999/19991108/active/3623n27.html ...

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 29
Langue Français

Extrait

Making a M O U NT A
Out of a M O G U L :
IN
Jeremy Bloom v. NCAA and Unjustified Denial of Compensation Under NCAA Amateurism Rules
-By Gordon E. Gouveia*
dream I to pursue another when he deferred enrolling at the 12 of the NCAA Division I Manual. 8  The NCAAs Athletics n 2001, Jeremy Bloom postponed one childhood by violating any regulations related to amateurism in Article University of Colorado at Boulder (hereinafter CU) on a Reputation Rule prohibits forms of compensation to student-football scholarship in order to train and compete in the 2002 athletes resulting from: publicity, reputation, fame, or ter Olympics. In 2002, before arriving at CU, Jeremy personal following that he or she has obtained because of Win 1 became the World Cup champion in freestyle moguls skiing athletics ability. 9  In Blooms case, the NCAA demonstrated and the youngest person ever to be ranked number one in its unwillingness to distinguish between the legitimate income freestyle moguls. 2  Before enrolling at CU, Bloom acquired of a professional athlete and the amateur status of a student-endorsement contracts with Dynastar, Oakley, and Under athlete. The NCAAs interpretation of athletics ability as it Armour, for which he was paid to use the manufacturers relates to pre-enrollment promotional activities and equipment, goggles, and apparel. 3  The endorsements enable compensation in general, reveals the NCAAs inability to Bloom to earn a comfortable living and to support the costs respond to a unique situation. associated with a professional skiing career. 4 In essence, the NCAA has determined that, in order As a freshman at CU, Jeremy Bloom, a wide receiver to remain eligible for football at CU, Bloom must forfeit the and punt-return specialist, had a 94-yard reception which was endorsements and modeling contracts he acquired as a the longest in school history and an 80-yard punt return professional skier, and, in doing so, jeopardize a potentially against Oklahoma in the 2002 Big 12 championship game. 5 illustrious professional skiing and acting career. Blooms case Bloom studies Communications and hopes to pursue a career highlights the injustice and hypocrisy of the NC AAs as a television and movie performer. 6  He also has a modeling amateurism rules and enforcement mechanisms. While the contract with clothing designer Tommy Hilfiger and acquired NCAA increasingly allows the exploitation of student-on-camera acting positions with Nickelodeon and Music athletes, it haphazardly asserts amateurism rules to preclude Television (MTV), which provide valuable opportunities to legitimate professional opportunities for student-athletes. realize his career goals. 7 This Note argues that the NCAAs interpretation of The only thing standing between Jeremy Bloom and the amateurism provisions of the NCAA Division I Manual, a multifaceted success story are the National Collegiate with respect to Jeremy Bloom, is unreasonable, particularly in Athletic Associations [hereinafter NCAA] amateurism light of the NC AAs treatment of other dual-spor t rules. NCAA rules provide that a student forfeits eligibility professional athletes. Consequently, the NCAA should create
22
SPORTS an exception to its amateurism provisions allowing Bloom and regulations and to issue interpretations of the NCAAs similarly-situated student-athletes to earn income from constitution. 15 sources unrelated to the amateur sport in which they Today, the NCAA is a commercial enterprise that compete. Furthermore, since the NCAA Bylaws constitute looks to maximize profits beyond a competitive rate. 16 a contract to which student-athletes are third-party Several scholars have argued that the NCAA maximizes beneficiaries, courts should provide a forum to ensure the profits by upholding an outdated principle of amateurism, consistent and equitable application of the provisions of that which prevents student-athletes from profiting from their contract. Part I explains the NCAAs role in regulating athletic abilities. 17  NCAA regulations governing the conduct student-athletes and the regulations that are applicable to of intercollegiate athletic programs must be adopted by the Jeremy Blooms case. A discussion about the NCAAs inability membership. 18  Member institutions are obligated to apply in this case to forge a solution that is consistent with its and enforce NC AA legislation, and the enforcement principles and rules will also be covered in this part. Part II procedures of the NCAA are applied to an institution when describes the legal battle between Jeremy Bloom and the it fails to fulfill this obligation. 19  Furthermore, courts have NCAA as an example of the courts historical deference to recognized the NCAA as serving these important functions. 20 the NCAA in enforcing its amateurism rules. This part also The NCAA posits as the philosophy underlying its considers the merits of an antitrust claim under these regulations in The Principle of Amateurism, which reads as circumstances and provides an analysis of Blooms contract follows: claim against the NCAA. Part III assesses the NCAAs Student-athletes shall be amateurs in an application of its rules to Bloom and suggests how the NCAA intercollegiate sport, and their participation should be and the courts should approach future cases involving motivated primarily by education and by the physical, similarly-situated student-athletes. Part IV concludes that the mental and social benefits to be derived. Student NCAAs reluctance to provide a waiver to Jeremy Bloom is participation in intercollegiate athletics is an avocation inconsistent with both its rules and its policies. Whether or and student-athletes should be protected from not a court provides a remedy, the NCAA should revisit its exploitation by professional and commercial position to better manage future cases. enterprises. 21 The NCAA has several regulations that purport to I. Background: The NCAA, Ama-further this philosophy in riontveidrceos lltehgaita tae  sattuhdleetnitc-sa. t hFilrestte, teurism, and Jeremy Bloom fNorCfeAitsA  eBliygliabiwli ty1 4f.o0r 1p.a3r.t1i cpipation in an intercollegiate sport by accepting payment in any form for participation in that sport or by violating any other regulations related to amateurism in Article 12. 22 This eligibility rule is reiterated in Bylaw 12.1.1(a) which provides that an individual loses amateur status and shall not be eligible for intercollegiate competition if the individual uses his or her athletic skill (directly or indirectly) for pay in any form in that sport. 23 Bylaw 12.1.1(a) is narrowly constructed such that an individual must receive payment for participation in the sport in which he competes as a student-athlete in order to forfeit eligibility. Therefore, Bloom cannot violate Bylaw 12.1.1(a) by earning income as a professional skier because he would not be earning income from the intercollegiate sport in which he competes: football. In fact, as early as 1974, a professional athlete in one sport has been permitted to represent a member institution in a different sport. 24 A student-athlete is permitted to earn a salary as a professional with the caveat that a student-athlete may not receive institutional financial assistance so long as he is receiving remuneration from a professional sports organization. 25 This regulation permits two-sport athletes to collect salaries as professionals in a different sport without forfeiting their amateur status. Most notably, this provision enabled Drew Henson to cash in on a $2 million signing bonus to play for the NewYorkYankees while playing football at the
A. The National Collegiate Athletic Association and Applicable Regulations The NC AA is an unincorporated voluntar y association with approximately 1,200 members, consisting of colleges, universities, and other educational institutions, with more than 360,000 student-athletes. 10  The members have adopted a constitution and bylaws specifying the agreements among members and rules under which they agree to operate. 11  The NCAA, initially created in 1906, regulates intercollegiate athletics to promote amateurism, academic integrity, and fair competition. 12 At its founding, the NCAAs stated purpose was as follows: Its object shall be the regulation and supervision of college athletics throughout the United States, in order that the athletic activities  may be maintained on an ethical plane in keeping with the dignity and high purpose of education. 13 Originally, NCAA member institutions agreed to self-policing, a concept known as home rule. 14  It was not until 1940 that the membership authorized the NCAA Executive Committee to investigate alleged violations of the NCAAs amateurism
23
Making a Mountain Out of a Mogul University of Michigan and ChrisWeinke to accept a $400,000 is being resolved. On the other hand, the potential for such signing bonus with the Toronto Blue Jays before winning the severe sanctions under Bylaw 19.8 discourages institutions Heisman trophy as the quar terback at Florida State from adhering to injunctions against the NCAA, and, as University. 26 Blooms case has revealed, may discourage courts from issuing Although Bloom hoped to earn an income as a skier injunctions against an institution at all. 33 in accordance with NCAA regulations, he would lose his Finally, under Bylaw 14.02.12, the NCAA may provide amateur status due to his planned endorsement income. The a waiver exempting an individual from the application of a NCAA amateurism regulations limit the type and amount of specific regulation. 34  A waiver requires formal approval by the compensation available to student-athletes. Compensation NCAAs Management Council, an NCAA committee or an may be paid to a student-athlete only for work actually NCAA conference. Such a waiver enables the NCAA to performed and at the going rate in that locality for similar apply its regulations on a case-by-case basis. The waiver services. 27  Moreover, Bylaw 12.4.1.1, the Athletics Reputation provides the NCAA with a mechanism to enforce its Rule, provides that compensation may not include any regulations equitably and in a manner that is consistent with remuneration for value or utility that a student-athlete may the principles upon which the NCAA regulations are have for an employer because of the publicity, reputation, fame grounded. or personal following that a student-athlete has obtained from B. The NCAAs Amateurism athletics ability. 28  Unlike the NCAAs Principle of Amateurism and eligibility rules, the amateurism rules are not narrowly Deregulation Reform drawn by the qualifying language of in that sport. In turn, the rules regarding amateurism grant the NCAA broader Beginning in 1997, an NCAA Subcommittee on discretion to limit compensation to student-athletes that is Agents and Amateurism began to identify problems with the not directly linked to their status as a student-athlete. The organizations emphasis on amateurism in order to develop NCAA expressly prohibits compensation for post-enrollment deregulation proposals that embodied a common sense promotional activities, including advertisements, modeling, and approach to amateurism. 35 The subcommittee was interested in taking a realistic approach to pre-enrollment activities and focusing on what it called the true concern of amateurism, competitive inequity. The
the NCAAs Principle foA ametur-36
      U     N    L    I   K    E   subcommittee recognized that ism and eligibility rules, the amateurism rules are certain NCAA eligibility rules not narrowly drawn by the qualifying language of in were penalizing prospective student-athletes for actions that sport  . that gave them no competitive advantage in intercollegiate sports. 37 endorsements. 29  Furthermore, although Article 12 grants an The NCAA deregulation proposals derived from exception for pre-enrollment promotional activities, the frequent questions voiced by scholars, administrators, and requirements, which incorporate the athletics ability student-athletes. Those questions included the following: language of the Athletics Reputation rule and omit the Are there differences between Olympians who accept qualifying in an intercollegiate sport language, are so limiting their prize money and those who do not? Will people as to render the exception meaningless. 30 increasingly take advantages of opportunities outside In addition to the self-enforcement mechanism the college arena? Should NCAA amateurism rules imposed on NCAA member institutions, the enforcement extend to individuals who are not part of the NCAA? procedures of the NCAA include the Restitution Rule of If the NCAA decides not to make changes should it Bylaw 19.8. 31 The Restitution Rule provides a list of sanctions take a different approach to enforcing NCAA rules  38 . that the NCAA may impose against a member institution The NCAA subcommittees proposals and the whose student-athlete participates in competition under the reforms that developed out of those proposals involved a terms of an injunction, which is later vacated, stayed, or major response to the realities of amateur competition. The reversed. 32  In light of the duration of litigating disputes with pre-enrollment proposals included waivers to the ineligibility the NCAA and the brevity of a collegiate career, a student- rules for certain pre-enrollment amateur and professional athletes only effective legal remedy is an injunction against the competition. 39  The proposals allowed individuals to enter NCAA and/or a member institution, allowing a student- professional drafts and sign professional contracts without athlete to take a desired course of action while the dispute forfeiting eligibility. 40  In essence, the reforms sought to
24
epeta  stsdune-tathletes in a direff tnerops  .te Thsoabteluan b hyBw ti211.al which.2,whori autforp sezlanoisseteleth aom ctos ndorsemeeiving eaeametrutn.s  hTfus amndm islerufnoctcilatne ylle thcausr beareeylrpitlassneyee -antdetu sitibohcer morf setelhtorndmeses ntmator yvaile ecne notive advantage, niatnia c moepitntmeseorerthras rof eht dne fo mto tDue  heaheirsnlat ah.s  raeisefonoisa hcrp sesetsu, t orhlataset dnierocpmnes, who aal skiernoce eht serongis ntmeseorndne o-lpsd auafecah tes tliti reaomic ot eudcitelhtaitilabs gen  iyr luirmshobiserpompeit cion nsatle ebigitiliur ys.leTh  ame euatel sra eafmrro einvasive than th ty,llnaFi  s.teur msiruetama eht/prudent stsporhtellaa-isnofoseedudro f plyclred gn-laueb mimoconal skiprofessiffceitevre sraee thrrst, itsoughs opaiet  iFtr.s ityuieqegllcon tepmocgnni evitigoal of preventii stu dnreylni gemerBly m oothwi fo aw areviJot inla sed eticnlirecoust AA me NChT.trops ralucitar p ainontipacisp raita-htelet studentted to a seialertca tivieastofd raneinl,erecA sN ACt ehfortm efefornt raog ycilopeht ,sthg inlyernd uls sna dxe eerofmregulatioisting rt sttaera,sni dnheottwr ntmef  omentorse  Wis.46 tnehtuomeneodsry,nemot ism ooBl elbanu  erih ota coach and persnolat arnirel kiote rchepeomtoti4.sr nI7hgilfo tnsiostueeqam shet tisiver ot AACateus am past todei voko trpt ahonti D. egnllaislugeoitamsirred ments, w endorseB olmos oeJerymhta lanot ,setelt orspo-siesofprw iafoa otJ ev rAAsheNCial  deniffitluceot alpxemerBly m oo dis eeruqriset ehN in.  Blooms cas morniogtelhf segeleho?Stog ol cdns miliBeolmoa uated atarly-sithta-tneduts a otestivitiacsteleueirmataht elu dend  extulessm rl naiisk angivct,ytiner  red mihhich arerelated oth sip orefssoihe tllWis ACA Nd ecnatsgaruocsit tounfi colplayf ooeleg?l  btlahe NCAA waiver.TlBoo m aedynni gmsory  bosthefer fle dnadetcsti ng cskiims Bloot  oemtnepidtsmiteeagre the os pselur msiruetamahttsnaidgnt ehf   In short,notwi dett otN eh?AACha tart une lareAC AehN aridoctn posomsn, titious smrofolBtroppattht acreA CA NmrnaA tnt ehS ehon underompetitiaoB.o drCN nv AA.5ct I0 ruit Astfoc ro mehf nit ome llycpicae tycdna edart fo tnaitres rofs imlauck down a footbehN AC,Aa dns rtasn n  aleill ga llakramnitealpgme Cupre fouourtegtn feRehS ,st rewslat  ttelagu taht dnsurtitnaitete ivi-ntmpcosnoiaer tsertcirnly if tsonableortciitnoohesr sevetitipeom-ctianT  15.tnemeerga egen ofRoardhe Bdna f uouotrstc itel5.sc   2eveSl rahoscrslaav hnetodet ah tht ecourts reasoninehtruf stacude rd ann iorieuatami tnmsnillgereoc coliate athlegesisnocnI nA:mool Bone ncta SsAA eCN  hTtr.Cc uo The.53 ionsrict noitserepmotasnNCe  cAAnglethe  yothclaoptrnutied an opg providl naioatiaegllCoAsnoitciN ehT  .nsatompeestrionRht eiggnsC CNAAor F: umha CenllIIsnT  .L ehlage of itsRegulatioettnA ppilacitnoulationscableReg
25
PSROSTcAtiocss AtelethA dnilppitaia nosiit dxegelugnr tpra pase anctictse sah dehsilba, nsioatAANCe thlaoliwgns utedtna precedent for pmocasneadetrp sth-ateletos e  be oftsids ouportnis la sisnofosendcoSe48s.rtpo setaigellocretni be allowuld not CNAAs ohyl ,ht ecet airtagtensaiircsanimt deid oenudstn ethlatt-w ohw sem ot hsiize aximeas valudune atslhte-ttaane a d ofprsieslanohta etel ni a differentsport .J reme ylBoo mna esop ton seodatrethr teeagry evi ititmoept co thethanity nequanoita lorp ssefecorveeiethlwhe yr .C no s aasaly, wheresequentlod eton moc tropRes tapuontiul r hsat ehtAlhteci regulations suc desuopso eht ybinpre th eesplcialiterugna dno sh ot witNCAAher toh nf epp aacro-yb-esac a pesact develoNCAA musoi,nht egrnazitaoinj eldoushs rtuoc ,esiwrehto ;ntlyisteconsons aliterugti sroections.Courts hav eihtsrocilaylg hentnf eceorntme fo sohter ealugce werenrespith ott ce tfnroehe he teniva A CA Nvel hgihfed fole nerugalepsntaoi a meanstions asti fle semeco tnndyaom cibigitilCNAAt  ognselael havionsulat regagniniatniam fo Ch  49m.isurtemast for as requenued ryBw iaev r122.wh, w la.014ht sCN eahciwolln thes.I rulrismo  faptrlr y eaedeA CA Nhe t0220moolBymereJ deinehB olmoc sa erbought to lightsialimhs rctronimo igsthn ame euatopasp orddersla  shossedmingrtcodetalersgile ot y itilib ts,leruegat si a evnavdpeomtitie er cnohgt ehes ,lahtuo.Finallyat stakea-tneduts eht fos ieitunrtpoope  yhwallritucpdracceeo sute tthlemaximize th2003the fess pro lksoians aeiign  45n.soAANCe Thuetamaslur msires, however, effceitevylp orihibcot enmptisainoneht rof fo mdne comomit deh llwoWorlthe  on peteI .tiucric puC dm hit os cllwit  o2$,0001$,500t0pete in 0 to com nevugomt pues odus ngri elsntveeve ni gorht stnrtpad aninatipiceBof44  tnreere ndorughents.semeknarlB srmooieceg ine thllcoe egsrmenestw ihhca ved several endoatnspeom cofm orf dradnats eht e43Prier.l skionaefsspaorof roi niv lg ineas  arns lareiksefonoising for  oftrainht eoctsna dap yanpld ne ptotiarapici etta neht s adifferent spotrt ah nhttah  eseornd eans ntmerosnopsdra spihsersiUnivf Coty ood ,olarhttana dlB  moodaro24.opp acaliwas erivtat ehU oftoablly of Colniversit etaigelloc a to iitt ha tt,orsptam  dhtonetitnois ning  skiogulibet dih mrfmoa ation Rule prohitA etelhRscitupea e ivwa oerthf ti ybilial yotp ing feitelighis tiw stnerof tuohngtiepccemrsdoenm the apdual fronaniidivoi nof rexn ptceropp avelamra ylt AAof oquiro acty tbilii anmosB1olno4.tilagurec ficipes a fo noitacilp
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents