Muslim Brotherhood Sticks With Bin Laden
2 pages
Français

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Muslim Brotherhood Sticks With Bin Laden

-

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
2 pages
Français
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

Muslim Brotherhood Sticks With Bin Laden

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 103
Langue Français

Extrait

www.TeachingFaith.com
Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood Sticks With Bin Laden
By Eric Trager
Most of yesterday's headlines proclaiming the death of Osama bin Laden used epithets
like "
terror mastermind
" or "
bastard
" to refer to the internationally feared mass murderer.
(That latter headline is from the New York Post.) But in its first
public statement
on the
killing of bin Laden, Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood used the honorific term "sheikh" to
refer to the al-Qaeda leader. It also accused Western governments of linking Islam and
terrorism, and defended "resistance" against the U.S. presence in Iraq and Afghanistan as
"legitimate."
The Muslim Brotherhood's response to bin Laden's death may finally end the mythology -
- espoused frequently in the U.S. -- that the organization
is moderate
or, at the very least,
could moderate
once in power. This is, after all, precisely how Muslim Brothers describe
their creed -- "moderate," as opposed to al-Qaeda, which is radical. "Moderate Islam
means not using violence, denouncing terrorism, and not working with jihadists," said
Muslim Brotherhood youth activist Khaled Hamza, for whom the organization's embrace
of "moderate Islam" was the primary reason he joined.
Yet the Muslim Brotherhood's promise that its "moderation" means rejecting violence
includes a gaping exception: the organization endorses violence against military
occupations, which its leaders have told me include Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Bosnia,
and Palestine -- in other words, nearly every major conflict on the Eurasian continent. "I
never fought in Afghanistan," Mehdi Akef, the former Supreme Guide of the Muslim
Brotherhood, told me in January, just before the revolt. "But I encouraged them and sent
money to Bosnia and Palestine until now." Muslim Brotherhood leaders have endorsed
attacks on Israeli civilians as an exception to their no-violence-except-against-occupation
exception, viewing all of Israel as an occupation. "Zionism is gangs," said Akef. "It's not
a country. So we will resist them until they don't have a country."
The attacks of September 11, 2001, however, created a real problem for the Muslim
Brotherhood's paradigms, since it was a violent attack against civilians on territory that
could not be considered occupied. Rather than denounce the attacks, however, the
organization chose to argue, outrageously, that Islamists were not responsible.
In some cases, Muslim Brothers have simply expressed doubts about the "theory" that al-
Qaeda was behind the attacks. "I don't believe it was jihadists. It was too big an
operation," said Abdel Monem Aboul Fotouh, a former member of the Muslim
Brotherhood Guidance Office who is often
touted
as one of the organization's reformers.
"This was done by a country, not individuals. It's not a conspiracy theory -- it's just
logical. They didn't bring this crime before the U.S. justice system until now. Why?
Because it's part of a conspiracy."
More frequently, Muslim Brotherhood leaders blame a more predictable target. "The
Jews and the Zionist lobby," Muslim Brotherhood legal thinker and former
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents