District Comparison of Benchmark Status Math

Gayle

Description

Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status - Whole Group2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07 MATHEMATICSDistrict Report2004-05 Benchmark Status 2005-06 Benchmark Status 2006-07 Benchmark StatusGradeExceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low TotalGrade 3 N 1337 1630 284 128 25 3404 1403 1571 200 126 19 3319 943 1553 219 543 86 3344% 39% 48% 8% 4% 1% 100% 42% 47% 6% 4% 1% 100% 28% 46% 7% 16% 3% 100%Grade 4 N 1126 1729 405 174 14 3448 1398 1679 160 117 21 3375 878 1641 292 395 88 3294% 33% 50% 12% 5% 0% 100% 41% 50% 5% 3% 1% 100% 27% 50% 9% 12% 3% 100%Grade 5 N 1074 1807 205 136 49 3271 1002 1928 261 112 57 3360 1117 1304 318 488 75 3302% 33% 55% 6% 4% 1% 100% 30% 57% 8% 3% 2% 100% 34% 39% 10% 15% 2% 100%Grade 6 N 1184 1417 396 346 42 3385 1070 1401 248 264 69 3052 1137 1333 311 398 67 3246% 35% 42% 12% 10% 1% 100% 35% 46% 8% 9% 2% 100% 35% 41% 10% 12% 2% 100%Grade 7 N 1395 1090 423 334 44 3286 1491 1047 374 300 69 3281 1132 1195 293 358 43 3021% 42% 33% 13% 10% 1% 100% 45% 32% 11% 9% 2% 100% 37% 40% 10% 12% 1% 100%Grade 8 N 1502 836 544 378 161 3421 1406 906 467 323 143 3245 1154 1282 321 448 43 3248% 44% 24% 16% 11% 5% 100% 43% 28% 14% 10% 4% 100% 36% 39% 10% 14% 1% 100%Grade 10 N 574 1002 820 533 205 3134 502 1009 879 533 199 3122 538 1119 352 890 61 2960% 18% 32% 26% 17% 7% 100% 16% 32% 28% 17% 6% 100% 18% 38% 12% 30% 2% 100%Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year. It ...

Informations

• Publié par: Essa
• Nombre de lectures: 29
• Langue: English

Extrait

Total Exceeds

Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status - Whole Group

2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07 MATHEMATICS

Total

Exceeds Meets

Near

2004-05 Benchmark Status

2005-06 Benchmark Status

2006-07 Benchmark Status

Low Very Low

Meets

Near

Low Very Low

Exceeds Meets

Near

Low Very Low Total

District Report

Grade

N

%

1337

284

25

Grade 3

1630

128

39%

8%

1%

48%

4%

1403

200

19

1571

126

42%

6%

1%

47%

4%

943

219

86

1553

543

28%

7%

3%

46%

16%

3404

100%

3319

100%

3344

100%

N

%

1126

405

14

Grade 4

1729

174

33%

12%

0%

50%

5%

1398

160

21

1679

117

41%

5%

1%

50%

3%

878

292

88

1641

395

27%

9%

3%

50%

12%

3448

100%

3375

100%

3294

100%

N

%

1074

205

49

Grade 5

1807

136

33%

6%

1%

55%

4%

1002

261

57

1928

112

30%

8%

2%

57%

3%

1117

318

75

1304

488

34%

10%

2%

39%

15%

3271

100%

3360

100%

3302

100%

N

%

1184

396

42

Grade 6

1417

346

35%

12%

1%

42%

10%

1070

248

69

1401

264

35%

8%

2%

46%

9%

1137

311

67

1333

398

35%

10%

2%

41%

12%

3385

100%

3052

100%

3246

100%

N

%

1395

423

44

Grade 7

1090

334

42%

13%

1%

33%

10%

1491

374

69

1047

300

45%

11%

2%

32%

9%

1132

293

43

1195

358

37%

10%

1%

40%

12%

3286

100%

3281

100%

3021

100%

N

%

1502

544

161

Grade 8

836

378

44%

16%

5%

24%

11%

1406

467

143

906

323

43%

14%

4%

28%

10%

1154

321

43

1282

448

36%

10%

1%

39%

14%

3421

100%

3245

100%

3248

100%

N

%

574

820

205

Grade 10

1002

533

18%

26%

7%

32%

17%

502

879

199

1009

533

16%

28%

6%

32%

17%

538

352

61

1119

890

18%

12%

2%

38%

30%

3134

100%

3122

100%

2960

100%

Note:

Because of problems with the state's computer-based assessment system (TESA) in early 2007, testing on it was discontinued and most students took paper-pencil tests in May.

Students who met state standards on

TESA between January and March were not retested in May.

Many of those students might have exceeded state standards and had higher test scores had they been retested.

Readers should keep this situation in mind

when reviewing 2006-07 reports showing percent Exceeding or test score gains from 2005-06.

Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year.

It became harder for students to meet Reading and Math standards at grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and, in Reading only, grade 7.

It became easier to meet

Reading and Math standards at grades 10 and, in Math only, grade 8.

The grade 7 Math and grade 8 Reading standard did not change.

Research, Evaluation & Assessment—09/14/07gw(2007-00139)

Total Exceeds

Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status - Whole Group

2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07 READING

Total

Exceeds Meets

Near

2004-05 Benchmark Status

2005-06 Benchmark Status

2006-07 Benchmark Status

Low Very Low

Meets

Near

Low Very Low

Exceeds Meets

Near

Low Very Low Total

District Report

Grade

N

%

1702

164

104

Grade 3

1320

106

50%

5%

3%

39%

3%

1679

171

43

1327

107

50%

5%

1%

40%

3%

1341

224

63

1468

246

40%

7%

2%

44%

7%

3396

100%

3327

100%

3342

100%

N

%

1217

292

58

Grade 4

1693

183

35%

8%

2%

49%

5%

1387

163

53

1655

115

41%

5%

2%

49%

3%

1373

317

71

1341

194

42%

10%

2%

41%

6%

3443

100%

3373

100%

3296

100%

N

%

966

269

75

Grade 5

1865

110

29%

8%

2%

57%

3%

1037

272

71

1813

168

31%

8%

2%

54%

5%

942

536

66

1485

275

29%

16%

2%

45%

8%

3285

100%

3361

100%

3304

100%

N

%

1183

423

36

Grade 6

1429

329

35%

12%

1%

42%

10%

1115

221

32

1412

281

36%

7%

1%

46%

9%

1028

436

66

1503

211

32%

13%

2%

46%

7%

3400

100%

3061

100%

3244

100%

N

%

1337

515

22

Grade 7

1116

300

41%

16%

1%

34%

9%

1515

424

37

1089

216

46%

13%

1%

33%

7%

1134

412

24

1286

163

38%

14%

1%

43%

5%

3290

100%

3281

100%

3019

100%

N

%

1191

646

53

Grade 8

1120

401

35%

19%

2%

33%

12%

1211

565

41

1114

320

37%

17%

1%

34%

10%

853

396

79

1561

350

26%

12%

2%

48%

11%

3411

100%

3251

100%

3239

100%

N

%

485

844

83

Grade 10

1154

574

15%

27%

3%

37%

18%

613

778

80

1111

545

20%

25%

3%

36%

17%

623

401

50

1319

621

21%

13%

2%

44%

21%

3140

100%

3127

100%

3014

100%

Note:

Because of problems with the state's computer-based assessment system (TESA) in early 2007, testing on it was discontinued and most students took paper-pencil tests in May.

Students who met state standards on

TESA between January and March were not retested in May.

Many of those students might have exceeded state standards and had higher test scores had they been retested.

Readers should keep this situation in mind

when reviewing 2006-07 reports showing percent Exceeding or test score gains from 2005-06.

Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year.

It became harder for students to meet Reading and Math standards at grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and, in Reading only, grade 7.

It became easier to meet

Reading and Math standards at grades 10 and, in Math only, grade 8.

The grade 7 Math and grade 8 Reading standard did not change.

Research, Evaluation & Assessment—09/14/07gw(2007-00139)