IRS Executive Compensation Audit Program

J_Jones

Description

DELAWARE GEORGIA NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA WASHINGTON, DC SEC AMENDS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES FOR STOCK-BASED AWARDS January 3, 2007 In late December 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it had amended its new executive compensation and director disclosure rules to more closely conform the disclosure of stock and 1option awards to applicable accounting standards for financial statement reporting. The amendments (the "Amendments") are intended to provide investors with a better view of the compensation earned by an executive officer or director during a particular reporting period (i.e., the requisite service period, as opposed to the full grant date fair value), and thus to be more aligned with the disclosure required for other forms of compensation in the Summary Compensation Table and the principles underlying financial statement disclosures. The Amendments, which were adopted in the form of interim final rules, are effective for the upcoming 2007 proxy season, so public companies should immediately begin considering their effect on required disclosures. In July 2006, the SEC adopted enhanced executive and director compensation, corporate governance and related person transaction disclosure requirements for proxy statements, registration statements and annual 2reports filed by public companies (the "July 2006 Rules"). Under the July 2006 Rules, a dollar value for all equity ...

Informations

• Publié par: Phyon
• Nombre de lectures: 22
• Langue: English

Extrait

DELAWARE

GEORGIA

NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WASHINGTON, DC

SEC AMENDS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES

FOR STOCK-BASED AWARDS

January 3, 2007

In late December 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it had amended its

new executive compensation and director disclosure rules to more closely conform the disclosure of stock and

option awards to applicable accounting standards for financial statement reporting.

1

The amendments (the

"Amendments") are intended to provide investors with a better view of the compensation earned by an

executive officer or director during a particular reporting period (

i.e.

, the requisite service period, as opposed

to the full grant date fair value), and thus to be more aligned with the disclosure required for other forms of

compensation in the Summary Compensation Table and the principles underlying financial statement

disclosures.

The Amendments, which were adopted in the form of interim final rules, are effective for the

upcoming 2007 proxy season, so public companies should immediately begin considering their effect on

required disclosures.

In July 2006, the SEC adopted enhanced executive and director compensation, corporate governance

and related person transaction disclosure requirements for proxy statements, registration statements and annual

reports filed by public companies (the "July 2006 Rules").

2

Under the July 2006 Rules, a dollar value for all

equity awards is required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, with the valuation based on the

aggregate grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards

Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment

("FAS 123R"), without regard to the effect of any service or vesting requirements.

As a result of the

Amendments, however, the Summary Compensation Table and Director Compensation Table will now be

required to disclose the compensation cost of equity awards over the requisite service period (generally, the

vesting period), as required under FAS 123R.

3

The Amendments also modify the Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table to (i) add a new column

showing, on a grant-by-grant basis, the full grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FAS

123R (thus retaining -- albeit in a different table -- the aggregate grant date fair value disclosure requirement

from the July 2006 Rules), and (ii) require disclosure regarding any options, stock appreciation rights or

similar option-like instruments that are repriced or materially modified, including disclosure regarding the

incremental fair value computed as of the repricing or modification date as determined in accordance with

1

The SEC press release regarding the amendments may be found at http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2006/2006-

219.htm.

The SEC’s interim final rules, Executive Compensation Disclosure, Release No. 33-8765 (December 22,

2006), may be found at

http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2006/33-8765.pdf.

2

See Executive Compensation and Related Person Disclosure, Release No. 33-8732A (August 29, 2006), which

can be found at

http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2006/33-8732a.pdf. Our client alert regarding the July 2006 Rules

can be found at http://www.wcsr.com/resources/pdfs/cs083006.pdf.

3

FAS 123R defines a requisite service period as the period or periods over which an employee is required to

provide service in exchange for a share-based payment.

Under FAS 123R, although compensation cost is initially

measured based on the award’s grant date fair value, it is generally recognized for financial reporting purposes over

the requisite service period.

1

WCSR

3507859v2

FAS 123R.

Finally,

the Director Compensation Table has also been revised to (i) require footnote disclosure

of the grant date fair value of each equity award, as computed in accordance with FAS 123R, and (ii) include

footnote information regarding any repriced or materially modified options, SARs or similar option-like

instruments (including disclosure of the incremental fair value of the award).

The compensation cost disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table for stock awards will not

include an estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting, but, if the named executive officer (or

"NEO") forfeits the award, the amount of compensation cost previously disclosed in the table will be deducted

in the period during which the award is forfeited.

Similar adjustments will be required for performance-based

vesting conditions, if, for instance, achievement of the performance goal was probable at the grant date, but

ceases to be probable at a later date.

These adjustments could, in some cases, result in a negative figure for the

column, which would, in turn, affect the NEO's total compensation tally.

Companies will need to implement

appropriate recordkeeping procedures to reflect these adjustments.

Companies also will need to assess the impact of the Amendments on identification of NEOs.

For

instance, an executive who was granted a large equity award with vesting components may currently be

identified as an NEO based on the aggregate grant date fair value of the award (applying the July 2006 Rules).

However, under the Amendments, the executive may not rise to the NEO level based on the fact that the dollar

value of his equity award would be reduced to only include the proportionate amount of the award’s total fair

value that will be recognized in the company’s financial statements for the fiscal year.

Companies also will

need to consider the effect of the Amendments not only on disclosures in the Summary Compensation Table,

Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table and Director Compensation Table, but also in the Compensation

Discussion and Analysis.

The Amendments were effective as of December 29, 2006.

However, the SEC did establish a 30-day

comment period for the Amendments, so it is possible that additional modifications to the Amendments may

be made.

Nonetheless, the Amendments are effective for proxy statements, registration statements and annual

reports on Form 10-K that relate to Regulation S-K Item 402 and Item 404 disclosures for fiscal years ending

on or after December 15, 2006.

As a result, public companies should take action now to analyze the impact of

the Amendments on their reporting and disclosure obligations.

The following Womble Carlyle Corporate and Securities attorneys are available to assist you in

addressing any questions that you may have regarding the matters discussed in this client alert.

Please contact

the attorney with whom you usually work or any one of the following attorneys if you have any questions.

Garza Baldwin, III

(Charlotte)

[phone] Jane Jeffries Jones

(Charlotte)

[phone]

Meredith P. Burbank

(Charlotte)

[phone] G. William Joyner III (Winston-

Salem)

[phone]

Jeffrey A. D. Cohen

(No. Virginia)

[phone] Kenneth W. Lewis

(RTP)

[phone]

Robert M. Donlon

(Charlotte)

[phone] Alonzo L. Llorens

(Atlanta)

[phone]

T. Clark Fitzgerald

III

(Atlanta)

[phone] Keith J. Mendelson

(No. Virginia)

[phone]

Elizabeth M. Orazem

(Atlanta)

[phone]

John D. Hopkins

(Atlanta)

[phone]

(Greenville)

[phone]

Jeffrey C. Howland

(Winston-

Salem)

[phone] Ross H. Parr

(Charlotte)

[phone]

Kenneth N. Shelton

(RTP)

[phone]

2

WCSR

3507859v2

Womble Carlyle client alerts are intended to provide general information about significant legal

developments and should not be construed as legal advice regarding any specific facts and

circumstances, nor should they be construed as advertisements for legal services.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you

that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to

be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii)

promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this

communication (or in any attachment).

3

WCSR

3507859v2