In vitro evaluation of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration
8 pages
English

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

In vitro evaluation of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
8 pages
English
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

Different types of bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes have been widely used for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with its ultimate goal of regenerating lost periodontal structures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biological effects of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes in cultures of primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGF), periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) and human osteoblast-like (HOB) cells in vitro . Methods Three commercially available collagen membranes [TutoDent ® (TD), Resodont ® (RD) and BioGide ® (BG)] as well as three nonresorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes [ACE (AC), Cytoplast ® (CT) and TefGen-FD ® (TG)] were tested. Cells plated on culture dishes (CD) served as positive controls. The effect of the barrier membranes on HGF, PDLF as well as HOB cells was assessed by the Alamar Blue fluorometric proliferation assay after 1, 2.5, 4, 24 and 48 h time periods. The structural and morphological properties of the membranes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results The results showed that of the six barriers tested, TD and RD demonstrated the highest rate of HGF proliferation at both earlier (1 h) and later (48 h) time periods ( P < 0.001) compared to all other tested barriers and CD. Similarly, TD, RD and BG had significantly higher numbers of cells at all time periods when compared with the positive control in PDLF culture ( P ≤ 0.001). In HOB cell culture, the highest rate of cell proliferation was also calculated for TD at all time periods ( P < 0.001). SEM observations demonstrated a microporous structure of all collagen membranes, with a compact top surface and a porous bottom surface, whereas the nonresorbable PTFE membranes demonstrated a homogenous structure with a symmetric dense skin layer. Conclusion Results from the present study suggested that GTR membrane materials, per se, may influence cell proliferation in the process of periodontal tissue/bone regeneration. Among the six membranes examined, the bioabsorbable membranes demonstrated to be more suitable to stimulate cellular proliferation compared to nonresorbable PTFE membranes.

Informations

Publié par
Publié le 01 janvier 2008
Nombre de lectures 24
Langue English

Extrait

Head & Face Medicine
BioMedCentral
Open Access Research In vitroevaluation of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration 1 1 2 3 Adrian Kasaj* , Christoph Reichert , Hermann Götz , Bernd Röhrig , 4 1 Ralf Smeets and Brita Willershausen
1 2 Address: Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany, Institute of Applied 3 Structure and Microanalysis, Medical Faculty, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany, Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology 4 and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aachen University, Germany
Email: Adrian Kasaj*  Kasaj@gmx.de; Christoph Reichert  c_reichert@web.de; Hermann Götz  hgoetz@mail.unimainz.de; Bernd Röhrig  roehrig@imbei.unimainz.de; Ralf Smeets  ralfsmeets@web.de; Brita Willershausen  willersh@unimainz.de * Corresponding author
Published: 14 October 2008 Received: 1 August 2008 Accepted: 14 October 2008 Head & Face Medicine2008,4:22 doi:10.1186/1746-160X-4-22 This article is available from: http://www.head-face-med.com/content/4/1/22 © 2008 Kasaj et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract Background:Different types of bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes have been widely used for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with its ultimate goal of regenerating lost periodontal structures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biological effects of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes in cultures of primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGF), periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) and human osteoblast-like (HOB) cellsin vitro. ® ® Methods:Three commercially available collagen membranes [TutoDent (TD), Resodont (RD) ® and BioGide (BG)] as well as three nonresorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes ® ® [ACE (AC), Cytoplast (CT) and TefGen-FD (TG)] were tested. Cells plated on culture dishes (CD) served as positive controls. The effect of the barrier membranes on HGF, PDLF as well as HOB cells was assessed by the Alamar Blue fluorometric proliferation assay after 1, 2.5, 4, 24 and 48 h time periods. The structural and morphological properties of the membranes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results:The results showed that of the six barriers tested, TD and RD demonstrated the highest rate of HGF proliferation at both earlier (1 h) and later (48 h) time periods (P< 0.001) compared to all other tested barriers and CD. Similarly, TD, RD and BG had significantly higher numbers of cells at all time periods when compared with the positive control in PDLF culture (P0.001). In HOB cell culture, the highest rate of cell proliferation was also calculated for TD at all time periods (P< 0.001). SEM observations demonstrated a microporous structure of all collagen membranes, with a compact top surface and a porous bottom surface, whereas the nonresorbable PTFE membranes demonstrated a homogenous structure with a symmetric dense skin layer.
Conclusion:Results from the present study suggested that GTR membrane materials, per se, may influence cell proliferation in the process of periodontal tissue/bone regeneration. Among the six membranes examined, the bioabsorbable membranes demonstrated to be more suitable to stimulate cellular proliferation compared to nonresorbable PTFE membranes.
Page 1 of 8 (page number not for citation purposes)
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents