GEMI Benchmark Survey Water Use, Issues & Management

Carl Wirdak

Description

GEMI SurveyGlobal EHS RegulationsFebruary 2004Carl WirdakOccidental Petroleum CorporationGEMI Benchmarking ChairOutline• Survey Recap• Context• Regulation Tracking• Development of Company Standards• EHS Program/Implementation•N ext S tepsGlobal EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004 2Survey overview• Response rate was just above 70%Outstanding!Not all companies completed all questions• There was good coverage across the sectors represented in GEMI• Thank you to all participants!Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004 3Context10Sales Revenue8Operations6420<20% 20 - 40% 40 - 60% 60 - 80% >80%U.S. PortionOnly 2 firms with non-U.S. headquarters provided responses to surveyGlobal EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004 4ResponsesWhat frames company EHS focus?Regulatory ImpactProductsEqualweightsOperations03691215Number of CompaniesCompany EHS focus is generally driven by issues related to operationsGlobal EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004 5EHS performance and reputation linkImportance of EHS PerformanceExtremely ImportantUnimportant1980's 1990's Today FutureThe importance of EHS performance on company reputation has increasedGlobal EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004 6Company EHS StructureDecentralizedHybridCentralized036912Number of CompaniesLocal or shared (with corporate) decision-making is the norm for survey respondentsGlobal EHS Regulations Benchmarking – ...

Informations

• Publié par: Nishor
• Nombre de lectures: 18
• Langue: English

Extrait

GEMI Survey

Global EHS Regulations

February 2004

Carl Wirdak Occidental Petroleum Corporation GEMI Benchmarking Chair

uOlt

•

•

•

•

•

•

nie

Survey Recap

Context

Regulation Tracking

Development of Company Standards

EHS Program/Implementation

Next Steps

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

2

Surv

•

•

•

ey overview

Response rate was just above 70%

Outstanding! Not all companies completed all questions

There was good coverage across the sectors represented in GEMI

Thank you to all participants!

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

3

oCntext

10

8

6

4

2

0

Sales Revenue Operations

<20%

20 - 40%

40 - 60%

U.S. Portion

60 - 80%  

>80%

Only 2 firms with non-U.S. headquarters provided responses to survey

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

4

atulegRtcapmI yro at frameWh yHE Sof socpmnas?cu

0

6 9 Number of Companies Company EHS focus is generally driven by issues related to operations

5

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

3

Operations

12

15

Products

Equal weights

EHS perfo

Extremely Important

Unimportant

rman

1980's

ec and reputation

Importance of EHS Performance

1990's

Today

 link

Future

The importance of EHS performance on company reputation has increased

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

6

Company EHS 

Decentralized

Hybrid

Centralized

S

0

tructu

3

re

6

9

Number of Companies

12

Local or shared (with corporate) decision-making is the norm for survey respondents

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

7

0%

20%

Facility / site locations

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

Regional headquarters

Corporate headquarters

Functional Group HQ

National HQ

80%

100%

40%

60%

gn eRpsno  yrtcaikegulator 8 R edicisno m - kanig or n of m  ha sd re ofno smr htiweht  ate,rpor ch c   whi itnoolac d oc  sna weet   b ed e it sen ytilibis rahs si  

soltog inkcart yrotalugeR Tr edaossataicsnoi d

• • •

Consultant / lobbyist

Companies typically employ more than one Knowledgeable company staff is the most important Trade associations play significant role

Company attorneys

Leg/Reg information management system

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

9

3r

party tracking service

Gov’t relations staff

•

Variety of useful approaches

Company staff experts

Reduce or eliminate tracking function

function at corporate

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

10

?n

Outsource function to 3rdparty provider

rd parties)? •Can  sn )roo tu (   ot3  tenahe t un   fioct  uoylaer e  yl imil omersu hewp aC n ue? • rescthe  to  oitacol ot(  nwody itilibnspoes   r wsae”tqe no – s sI“  ssociati  trade  a sdna TI• ?htiwmed  ngpi p    u tyuiee k cyenec tefg cifiart nikcalugyrotRe adetosilC s no tiei g ckin tra l  ot ytilibisnop ilac f /nsioatoc iance on•Rel ns Im atio ent plemmrtaniof aman oi n s R ueiqhn remoy eldart no  icossa  e rTnafsrer se mege sntteysm

Ot

•

•

•

•

•

her efficiency ideas

Corporate tracks U.S. / EU regulation and general EHS management trends, with country (ex-U.S.) and state developments tracked at the division and facility level

Global expertise centers or media/topic/geographic teams leverage regulatory management and allow sites to focus on locally specific regulations and effective implementation

Representatives from business groups who are responsible for regulatory matters share information on best practices and discuss emerging issues

New EHS management system has integrated efforts and allows more emphasis on strategic planning / new product development

Global subscription to the Bureau of National Affairs (BNA) EHS Library allows locations to determine regulatory impact

Global EHS Regulations Benchmarking – February 2004

11