THESE ISSUES SHOULD BE ADDRESSED IN A SEPARATE NOTE TO JIM BAETGE
Description
This matrix captures questions and comments raised during review and discussion of the Alternative 2 Executive Summary, along with responses. Last updated September 12, 2008 SECTION/ISSUE QUESTION OR COMMENT POSED REPLY Transportation What about helicopter noise? TRPA cannot practically regulate helicopters that are based outside of the Basin, but can regulate those operations based at the South Lake Tahoe Airport and permitted by TRPA under current Code provisions. Land use Would it be possible for TAUs The intent of the TAU conversions to converted to residential units to residential use is to create home ownership in rt back to TAUs depending on both the affordable and moderate price market forces at play? ranges. Individually owned units, in particular if deed restricted, would most likely be owner-occupied. Given the abundance of TAUs, it should not be necessary to convert back. Transportation What about asphalt noise? The Plan Update will include technological solutions such as the use of low-noise asphalt or other appropriate methods. See the most recent Regional Plan Update Executive Summary for details. Land use Should an affordable housing trust A housing mitigation fund is included in fund be established? Alternative 2. See the most recent Regional Plan Update Executive Summary for information. Transportation Can the TTD take a larger role in The TTD is focused on providing gap transit implementing transportation solutions ...
Informations
| Publié par | Efta |
| Nombre de lectures | 15 |
| Langue | English |
Extrait
This matrix captures questions and comments raised during review and discussion of the Alternative 2 Executive Summary, along with responses. Last updated September 12, 2008
SECTION/ISSUE Transportation
Land use
Transportation
Land use Transportation
Transportation Conservation
QUESTION OR COMMENT POSED REPLY What about helicopter noise? TRPA cannot practically regulate helicopters that are based outside of the Basin, but can regulate those operations based at the South Lake Tahoe Airport and permitted by TRPA under current Code provisions.
Would it be possible for TAUs The intent of the TAU conversions to converted to residential units to residential use is to create home ownership in convert back to TAUs depending on both the affordable and moderate price market forces at play? ranges. Individually owned units, in particular if deed restricted, would most likely be owner-occupied. Given the abundance of TAUs, it should not be necessary to convert back. What about asphalt noise? The Plan Update will include technological solutions such as the use of low-noise asphalt or other appropriate methods. See the most recent Regional Plan Update Executive Summary for details. Should an affordable housing trust A housing mitigation fund is included in fund be established? Alternative 2. See the most recent Regional Plan Update Executive Summary for information. Can the TTD take a larger role in The TTD is focused on providing gap transit implementing transportation solutions services between north and south Lake such as a coordinated transit system Tahoe, and to and from the Basin. Other around the Basin? activities TTD is focusing on is the delivery of key regionally significant transportation projects such as the US 50 Stateline Core project, Waterborne Transit, and other significant projects. The TTD Board does not see the added value in taking over operation of the transit services, but rather provides for coordination between the existing services, including additional service connections. Incorporate all basin roads, trails and The RTP will include all contemplated projects bikeways into the Regional while the EIP will provide a shorter term (10-Transportation Plan along with year) implementation strategy that includes funding in the EIP to retrofit and operations and maintenance of the facilities. maintain the systems. Incorporate the water quality model The models developed as part of TMDL into the project evaluation process. (clarity model, watershed model) were not Gives a tool for Planners to determine intended for long-term policy/feedback use. threshold gains/losses. This was one Lahontan does not have physical possession
Conservation
Land Use
of the original selling points. of the watershed model and while some Plans have been developed to acquire or bring this model in-house, no funding is specifically ear-marked at this point in time for this purpose. Review the USFS Watershed Quality The activities and evaluations under Pathway Assessment to determine if federal Phase I and II of the Adaptive Management lands are implementing necessary Framework in particular for Soil Conservation, watershed measures. (Trails?, SEZ, Recreation, Vegetation, and Water restoration of disturbed lands, Quality resource areas supersede the vegetation) Watershed Assessment evaluation of need. The needs expressed in the Watershed Assessment were referenced in the Pathway Resource Technical Supplements. These issues will be addressed in one or Consider strategies allowing transfer more of the alternatives being proposed. See of development rights, allocations and the land coverage, and climate change coverage only to areas where past discussions in the most recent Regional Plan disturbance has occurred, and only Update Executive Summary. when measures for threshold attainment are part of the transfer. Where possible target undisturbed and undeveloped parcels for public buyout. AND: Reduce greenhouse gases through concentrated development and diversification of transportation modes. (How about the Aspen model. Aren’t we considering some of these strategies?) All “less than significant All projects requiring environmental Land use; environmental impact determinations documents (EA or EIS) have to address the cumulative impacts should vanish. We need to deal with cumulative impacts of all reasonably cumulative impacts. foreseeable projects. Land use; two-step The two-step subdivision process The two-step subdivision process is not subdivision process should be rewritten to make it not proposed to be changed in the Plan Update. appear as a way around the rules. Land use Add a separate new section indicating Under the current Plan and Code, TAU and how no allocations will be made to CFA are allocated only to adopted Community areas or communities where a Plan areas, Master Plans, and designated community Plan or Master Plan has town centers. The same provision will be not been completed included in the Plan Update. Under the Community Enhancement Program, allocations may be reserved for projects under review, but not allocated until such time as a Community Plan or Master Plan is adopted. Add a separate new section indicating In Alternative 2, progress on defensible how no allocations will be made to space/ fuels treatments will become a part of areas or communities where fire the local jurisdiction’s annual allocation protection measures have not been performance, review upon which additional implemented residential allocations are based. A “no allocations approach will not be recommended, although new single family homes will not be approved where inadequate fire supply and facilities exist.
Land use
Land use
Add a separate new section indicating In Alternative 2, progress on meeting how no allocations will be made to affordable housing needs will become a part areas or communities where of the local jurisdiction’s annual allocation affordable housing stock is decreasing performance review on which additional residential allocations are based. A “no allocations option is not feasible and will not be considered. Land use; water “Add a separate new section Specific sediment loading reductions will not quality; allocations indicating how no allocations will be be known at the time of Plan Update adoption, made to areas or communities where but TMDL implementation strategies will be in TMDL contributions have not been place as part of the water quality threshold adequately addressed attainment program. Because allocations issued over the life of this Plan Update will be distributed in five-year increments, TMDL contributions can be integrated as part of the performance review criteria prior to the release of any allocations following the first five-year evaluation when specific loading data should be available. CEP projects will also be evaluated on these performance measures. Land use; water Add a separate new section indicating BMP performance will continue to be factored quality; allocations how no allocations will be made to into the annual residential allocation areas or communities where performance review process which Residential BMP targets are not met determines the number of allocations to be awarded to each local jurisdiction. In addition, BMP compliance will be required in the Plan Update upon point of sale of property. There will not be a “no allocations option recommended. Land use; Will all allocations be based on a 5 The release of future allocations following the allocations year threshold attainment standard? first five-years of the updated Regional Plan will be subject to the outcome of each five-year threshold evaluation. Only one-fourth of the total proposed allocations will be assigned to each five-year period. “A phase-out of all allocations should The updated Plan focuses on redevelopment, be considered so the construction versus new development.: Although single-industry does not hit a wall as family residential projects will eventually reach allocations expire. buildout, allocations will still be needed for multi-family/residential projects. “We should be discussing the TTD See related response on TTD role (previously role for revenue generation, and in this document). See regional revenue issue specifically leading to a stormwater discussed in EIP update section of Regional discharge fee for all properties similar Plan Update Executive Summary. to what is now done in many jurisdictions. If ever one is justified, the TRPA area is a prime candidate. It would also be used to achieve compliance with thresholds by
Allocations
Transportation
EIP
causing a higher assessment for properties without onsite retention. It would also lead to a method of funding for local governments to reduce fine sediments, possibly implemented by the TTD. The EIP should program and fund The EIP update will identify research and necessary research to document related funding needs and prospective threshold revisions to be completed in sources. These needs will be the years to come. developed/funded as needed on an ongoing basis. Additional threshold updates may be brought forward within two to five years of Plan Update adoption. Further discussion should include The TIE (Tahoe Interagency Execs) performs making FACA a better functioning this function. There is membership crossover organization. It should not just be between FACA and TIE. One consideration is project funding, but a means of to add Coalition members to the TIE group. creating communication between all entities working in the basin. Recreating the joint legislative agenda to help toward getting the $2.4 Billion funding package for the EIP. Water quality; “(This (this 97-foot standard) is The water quality standard set in 1970 has not thresholds equivalent to the standard used in the changed and will not change. The only 1987 Plan ?, TRUE?. difference is that under program strategies spelled out for the TMDL the interim goal of 80 feet will be used as a 20-year target. We proposing to adopt the Annual Average Secchi depth (97 foot) standard ~ same as the ’87 Plan with Winter Average. The maintenance, construction We are in the process of updating the BMP manual addressing maintenance and manual and including updated salt and construction practices in the Basin sanding practices in the Regional Plan Update should be completed. that will suffice in the interim. Our last attempt at implementing such a manual was not very successful but we’re willing to tackle this issue again after the Plan Update. Need to complete the Bluego transit There has been a transit center at Stateline terminal at Stateline (64 acre tract?) since 2001. Review of Bluego contract BlueGO contracts are not managed as part of requirements and how they are met. Regional Plan implementation, but rather as an ongoing function of the South Tahoe Area Transit Authority. Several marketable rights programs While significant environmental net gains were established as part of the 1987 have been realized under the current
Transportation
Transportation Transportation Land use
Plan. It is unclear to what extent these Regional Plan under the EIP and as a result programs have achieved their goals, of redevelopment projects in particular, the or how they support the new goals of Plan Update will include provisions seeking to the Plan Update. leverage more significant benefits moving forward. Additionally, TRPA is open to beginning a collaborative process of examining these policies and evaluating how to improve them. We will continue the development rights program that spells out how coverage and allocations are administered with a strategic objective of improving how incentives and the process for distribution work. Land use; coverage Because of supply shortages, the The Regional Plan Update will look at ways to current Regional Plan mandate to be more flexible with land coverage transfers offset the impacts of coverage is not and other incentives. This includes revisions being achieved in some areas, and to coverage transfer provisions relative to important private and public projects impaired watersheds, among other areas. that require coverage may not be able Please see the Executive Summary document to move forward. for details. TMDL; water quality The Plan Update no longer appears to While schedules have changed, coordination be integrated with the TMDL and the and consistency checks continue. We are Forest Plan Revision, as originally incorporating all of the TMDL strategies into envisioned through the Pathway 2007 the Regional Plan Update and are on target process.` with the updated forest Plan among other relevant documents. TRPA’s annual process of linking Please refer to the Regional Plan Update building allocations to performance in Executive Summary document and this implementing the EIP was intended to document for information about how the provide a powerful incentive for local existing allocations system may be revised. government to make progress toward There are proposed policies emerging that attainment of the thresholds. While would tie allocations to: affordable housing, many local governments are making fire safety and TMDL/water quality load significant progress, there is little or reduction targets. Additionally, CFA and TAUs no evidence that the building are being offered as incentives under the CEP allocation process itself provides to leverage environmental net gains in urban much of an incentive. core areas. The Tahoe Integrated Information and The Agency remains fully committed to the Management System (TIIMS) was TIIMS project and intends to continue looking established with a budget of over $2 for ways to keep it funded and develop million to house and disseminate practical uses for it moving forward, technical and scientific information independent of the Plan Update. For example, related to the Basin to the agencies, the Agency has proposed using TIIMS as a stakeholders, and the public. tracking system and centralized database for Maintaining and further developing defensible space and forest fuels treatment TIIMs no longer seems to be a high work moving forward around the Basin and priority of TRPA and other agencies in will continue to pursue funding to fully the Basin, despite the continuing need implement TIIMS. for a centralized and coordinated process for gathering and sharing data and other scientific information to improve effectiveness of programs/projects throughout Basin.
Allocations
TIIMS
Thresholds; wildfire; Change appears inconsistent with The Forest Service has been consulted and vegetation existing 200-acre Protected Activity there is no conflict here. These 500-acre non-Centers adopted in the Forest Service disturbance zones complement the 200-acre Sierra Nevada Forest Plan US Forest Service Protected Activity Centers Amendment. Where is the 500-acre by overlaying them and providing additional overlay zone called for in that protection. While the USFS/Sierra Nevada document? Mgmt standards on natl Forest Plan amendment is referenced for forest lands should be consistent & procedures related to the establishment and led by Forest Service. Consideration maintenance of non-disturbance zones, TRPA of existing reservations of use under is not bound by that document. See the permits such as a ski resort must be Regional Plan Update Executive Summary, explicitly provided for in the Conservation Element section, for additional determination of what constitutes information. suitable habitat. Scenic issues; Where are the changes to the scenic Switching to a form-based system will provide threshold threshold for developed and urban more certainty as to what projects will look like areas that have been discussed? If before they are conceptualized. The emphasis we are going to form-based core on revitalization projects will not result in a areas with higher densities & more conflict with our scenic threshold concerns. intense land uses, there must be a g change in the way the correspondin For background, “Form-based Codes built environment is rated or the two address the relationship between building will conflict. facades and the natural surroundings, the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another, and the scale and types of streets . Form-based Codes are designed to achieve a community vision based on time-tested forms of urbanism. Ultimately, a form-based Code is a tool; the quality of development outcomes is dependent on the quality and objectives of the community Plan that a Code implements. Water quality; Need cost estimates & funding Please refer to the EIP update funding TMDL; BMPs strategy to implement the TMDL strategies outlined in the new attachment to treatment systems before relying on a the Regional Plan Executive Summary new capital investment Plan. Where document for answers information about the is the detail on the roadway funding breakdowns that may be included in maintenance strategy changes? the EIP update. We will provide more detail These have implications for huge moving forward to address this question more operational cost increases. Recent directly also. discussions have suggested that residential BMPs are not nearly as significant as once thought. How will implementation & maintenance compliance be structured? No info in summary about it. Why continue this focus if no longer the key strategy? How will defensible space Funding for both forest fuels treatments and compliance/ implementation be enforcement of defensible space funded? This info is key to knowing requirements will fall on the forest service and chances of success. How will local fire districts/agencies. Although TRPA compliance at the local level be will continue to play a role in both, TRPA will measured and communicated to be most active in public outreach and TRPA? How, specifically, will TRPA education on these issues. In the case of fire
Fire safety
incorporate into the annual local districts, local agencies are already working to jurisdiction Performance Review secure reliable funding streams for their process? programs. Douglas County, for example, will pursue a local assessment to fund its fire safety functions. Conservation/Water Existing design standard is 20 yr one It is premature to revise the existing design Quality hour storm. Regional Plan language standard, as there is no basis currently for should include description of the new doing so. It is necessary to look at the result replacement design standard required of the treatment, not the mere volume being by TMDL or at least a discussion of treated. Ultimately, a load reduction standard potential parameters of the will be developed that will become more the replacement standard. NWF focus than the infiltration standard. comment, “ Provide more detail on what specific policies/ Code changes/ More information about how this will work will design standards will be included in be forthcoming by the end of 2008 and the Plan in terms of WQ improvement integrated into the Plan Update. TMDL to facilitate WQ improvements in compliance strategies will be included in the advance of new waste load Regional Plan Update. allocations. Excess coverage NWF comment: “First bullet indicates Under existing policy today, excess coverage mitigation/ excess coverage mitigation fees will can be mitigated in two ways: By removing Conservation/ Water further increase. Concept is attractive existing coverage (on-site or off-site) or by Quality on the surface, however, these fees paying an in-lieu fee based on the actual cost are but one of several mitigation fees to acquire and remove the required amount of borne by projects. Desire to “reflect excess coverage. Currently, this fee is more appropriately the cost of discounted based on a percentage of the financing projects that reduce fine structural construction cost. TRPA Code sediment loading cannot be looked at encourages removal of existing coverage over in a vacuum. First, sensitivity to the collecting the fee whenever feasible. potential disincentive of excessive Incentives and requirements will be proposed mitigation fees needs to be to reduce land coverage in Community Plan recognized and secondly a reduction areas This will be addressed by increasing in excess mitigation fees should coverage transfer ratios to provide incentives operate as an incentive if an to remove coverage from over-covered areas, appropriate degree of coverage focus excess coverage mitigation on removal reduction is included in proposal. of coverage in over-covered areas and SEZs, Recommendation:1. Recognize encourage buy-out programs to permanently sensitivity of potential disincentive of retire excess coverage and to maintain excessive mitigation fees commodity prices and incentives and focus on 2. Reduction in mitigation fees should additional incentives for removal of coverage operate as an incentive if an from SEZs and over-covered areas. appropriate amount of coverage reduction is included. Numerous questions have come up The CEP program is already informing the as to how the CEP will “inform the Regional Plan Update, as the pre-application Regional Plan. Additionally, numerous process, reservation of commodities as inquiries have been made as to incentives to leverage environmental whether community Plan amendments improvements, project review procedures and needed to accommodate CEP other aspects of the CEP have given us a test projects might compromise the run of concepts under consideration. There is Community Plan amendment process no presupposition that CEP projects must spelled out in the community Plan. reach final approval for the program to provide valuable information that can inform the Plan Update. With regard to community Plan amendments, those moving forward as part of a project are minimal in scope and will require
Community Enhancement Program
environmental review and public input. They are independent of the broader CP update process and require consistency with existing CPs. Further, as part of the Plan Update implementation, a process will be developed for future CP updates moving forward. Land use/ transect Transect Zoning. Local govt should be It is not a function of the form-based Code zoning identified as the proper forum for and transect zoning system to dictate what deciding what “small retail shops, loft types of businesses should be located in apartments and small-scale multi- commercial space only the scale, character, family residences are, not TRPA. general use categories, form, and design of Local govts are best suited to uses appropriate for specific areas, and determine the specific needs of its consistent with Plan area citizens & community and customize statements/community Plans, etc. See neighborhood centers (which are Regional Plan Update Executive Summary, appropriately designated at the Land Use section, for more information. regional level). It is not clear how the regional design standard will recognize and sustain the unique character of individual communities around the Lake Tahoe Basin. Recommendation: .While TRPA should designate (identify/facilitate) neighborhood centers; local govts should customize to their local needs. TRPA should set sideboards, such as maximum densities, for local governments to make land use decisions within community Plan areas; community Planning should involve meaningful choices. Need Clarity/ Detail in Text particularly on what the “sideboards would be What type of sideboards/enabling See previous note on CEP legislation/tools need to be included in the Regional Plan Update to lay the foundation for the transect-based planning approach and how does this relate to the Community Plans/CEP projects? PTOD Nodal Overlay: For a variety of What is intended is for the highest densities reasons, some Plan areas adjacent to and greatest building heights to reside in the community Plans contemplate urban cores of community Plan areas. development adjacent to those urban Outside core areas, mixed-use development areas, somewhat foretelling the incentivized by commodities will be allowed, transect concept. The sentence “the but not to the same density, height and form. nodal overlay will disallow this, Density and height allowances in particular concentrating density and mixed uses should decline outside of the urban core in these designated areas only areas. In response to this comment, the suggests that the Plan areas adjacent Regional Plan Update Executive Summary to community Plans that underwent has been edited with clarifying language. extensive discussion, negotiation and compromise will be excluded from implementing previously allowed uses. This prohibition is overbroad
Land use
Land use
Affordable housing
Recreation
Transportation
and probably overstates Agency’s intention. Additional comment: not clear extent of problem; need to see examples. Many run down motels have served Hotels and motels are considered tourist as non-conforming low-income accommodations, not residential units. The 1-housing. Imposition of a 1-to-1 1 mitigation would apply to residential units replacement housing obligation for the only. demolition of a motel unit that has outlived its useful life will serve only to perpetuate the non-conforming use of distressed properties. Accordingly, mitigation should not be imposed for removal of motel units that are serving as substandard housing. Unnecessary to reduce PAOT Plan Update The number of PAOTS will not allocations which represent a be reduced in the Plan Update. Rather, significant portion of the Region’s PAOTS allocated during the life of the existing economic base, as well as an Plan will be subtracted from the total. The new environmental threshold. This is Plan will reflect the number of PAOTS particularly the case for adopted remaining. Master Plans which already have additional approved PAOTs. The (The total number of PAOTS in the market will determine the need for and current Regional Plan is 6,114 for rtiemcirnega tioonf PAprOoTi deuses. ndS tatet/hfeeidr overnight facilities, 6,761 for summer day v rs a use facilities, and 12,400 for winter day-punerdmeritstteaensd arde rebaects t to suwitheadt thteo use. an rdeecmreaantidosn arper,eafenrde nacree s beastn d- suimteardk teot The total number for the Plan Update will implement the recreation program. be 5,720 for overnight, 5,814 PAOT for TRPA should serve as a summer day use, and 7,927 for winter. clearinghouse for recreation information only that allows it to determine compliance with the recreation threshold targets. The req to re-evaluate based on the outcome of a future study that is likely neither programmed nor funded is very weak logic to an action that will significantly impact the Region’s ability to earn revenue from its basic economic activity and then reinvest a portion of into capital and maintenance necessary to attain and maintain the applicable thresholds. Additional Comment: Not clear on the exact issue here; TRPA does have a role in assuring high quality outdoor public recreation experiences. What specific new Regional Plan Polices will not call out or name specific policies will drive “alternative fuel and technologies. They will be structured to “low to zero emission public fleet require the cleanest fleet vehicles available vehicles? What technology or and feasible . technologies will be used for such vehicles? Any new TRPA policy or
Transportation Transportation
SEZ
policies regarding alternative fuel or low to zero emission public fleet vehicles should be discussed with the Tahoe Transportation District, TART and the BlueGo Board. These entities are the ones making decisions about the type of vehicles being purchased for Tahoe’s public transit systems. There are technologies which exist and operate successfully in the Tahoe environment; there are those that don’t operate in this environment; finally, there are those which are simply a “pipe dream. Those preparing the Regional Plan Update need to understand the realities of what works at Lake Tahoe. Note: These comments also relate to the second bullet item on page 18. (NWF Comment: TTD is not This is not being proposed in the Regional appropriate body to implement a Plan Update. . storm water utility. Any SW utility must include credit for cap inv already made.) Transit Service & Paid Parking. This is not specifically called out as a revenue Unclear whether or not it is the source, but could be a part of a broader intention to impose paid parking upon discussion relative to regional revenue. private businesses, and if so, what is the proposed mgmt strategy? Existing transit stakeholders & providers must be provided with a credit for existing investment in providing service, or an option to participate in the BlueGo or similar service elsewhere in the region. This must be added to the summary. Paid parking is a sensitive issue and must include a significant amount of up-front dialogue & agreement with those being asked to implement it to succeed. Comment: “With the new knowle Please see the updated Regional Plan Update that any disturbance over 10% begdingse Executive Summary, TMDL discussion. Also the degradation of a watershed, it is please note that the impervious coverage models deal with coverage on a necessary to revise the Bailey watershed/stream basis depending on riparian e buffers. The Bailey coverage allowances were coverag allowances downward to based on tolerance of land to disturbance, not increase protection of Lake Tahoe. on a watershed basis. The question of Individual projects must attain 100% overcrowded watersheds should be storm runoff on site. addressed on these levels moving forward. In addition, the SEZ offsets must be increased to a level that mimics 100% natural function. Four to one (4:1) offsets are found in local regulations
throughout the country. Tahoe, which is considered extremely sensitive, deserves no less. Mitigation fees; air A lengthy discussion was inserted into To the first point, the proposed policy relating quality the RPE Executive Summary outlining to street sweepers will not call out a specific a detailed strategy for restructuring PM efficiency, but rather cite the “best mitigation fees. This included a available technology. See the revised Region suggestion that street sweepers Plan Update Executive Summary for the purchased with air quality mitigation current status of air quality recommendations. fees be “PM2.5 efficient and further relayed the following: “ Consider options for replacing mitigation fees with mandatory offsets. For example, rather than higher mitigation fees, which are pay to pollute systems, ensure a net environmental benefit by requiring: 1. A net decrease in coverage from the baseline level of impervious coverage. All new proposals for additional coverage must be offset with actual reduction of coverage in similar soil/watershed conditions elsewhere. 2. No net increase in vehicle trips or vehicle emissions, including greenhouse gas emissions. Any new projects that will increase vehicle trips and emissions must be offset with actual vehicle trips and emissions reduction elsewhere, via public trans. projects and strategies that actually get people out of their cars. Extensive comments and narrative Although the load reduction targets are not yet were offered with regard to interim available, we are incorporating recommended protocols for achieving load reduction TMDL strategies into the Plan Update. These prior to large-scale pump & treat are described in the updated Executive facilities coming online and calling Summary. for a requirement that 100 percent on-site storm retention be adopted as a standard for projects. Fireproof/ignition Two references were made to This regulation is best deferred to local and resistant building requiring ignition resistant / fireproof state building Codes, versus making it part of materials building materials. the Regional Plan Update. REGIONAL PLAN UPDATE Land use An extensive rewrite of the It is not possible to track threshold attainment introduction to the Land Use section on a project by project basis. Performance of the Regional Plan Update standards are already in place through the Executive Summary was suggested residential allocation performance review including performance standards for system. Affordable housing and defensible projects be tied directly to threshold space enforcement will be added to these attainment, and development of raw standards. Because the Lake Tahoe Basin land be prohibited. has urban growth boundaries in place, there are protections against sprawl development in the current Plan that will be included in the
TMDL/load reduction
© 2010-2024 YouScribe