AllAlioyAU/HTALISMA GNOSTICINTOCOSVEBTEDOF CKEES JADE,CEBACMA197.)(See pageGNOSTICSTHEANDTHEIR REMAINS,MEDIEVAL.ANCIENT ANDW. MA.C. KING,omnia caacisNam veluti trcpidant atquepuorisic nos in luce timemusIn tencbris metuimt,sunt metueudaIntcrdum nilo magis quamqua;futura.ori in tenebris finguntquepavitant,SECOND EDITION.LONDON:STRAND.DAVID NUTT, 270,1887.LONDON :AND SONS, LIMITED,BY WILLIAM CLOWESPRINTEDCROSS.CHARINQSTAMFORD STREET ANDreserved.][All rightsPREFACE.WHEN this work first itappeared, three-and-twenty years ago,became at once an of unmerited and ofabuse,object equallyunmerited Small divines it for an insidiouspraise. mistaking"to overthrow as law established,"attempt opinions by spurtedat it with in the milk of the under; whilst,pens dipped Gospel""the same Friends of lauded it tohallucination,very Lightthe skies either both of theparty equally ignorant subject,and of the of labours. One noted Zoiluspurpose my (whoserecollections of Homer would seem to be of the same deeply-marked nature as Blifil is atEnsign disgusted my citings)" "of the anotherAidoneus as a title of the God Shades is;astonished at in Bardanes a Persian,ignorance callingmyhe notwhereas was a native of Pontus that; understandingwas valid in of the mistake Pontusmy argument equally spitea of the of and whatDarius,being empireoriginally provinceis whence Mithraicismmore to the the actual focuspurpose,diffused itself ...
AllA
lioy
AU/H
TALISMA GNOSTICINTOCOSVEBTEDOF CKEES JADE,CEBACMA
197.)(See pageGNOSTICSTHE
AND
THEIR REMAINS,
MEDIEVAL.ANCIENT AND
W. MA.C. KING,
omnia caacisNam veluti trcpidant atquepuori
sic nos in luce timemusIn tencbris metuimt,
sunt metueudaIntcrdum nilo magis quamqua;
futura.ori in tenebris finguntquepavitant,
SECOND EDITION.
LONDON:
STRAND.DAVID NUTT, 270,
1887.LONDON :
AND SONS, LIMITED,BY WILLIAM CLOWESPRINTED
CROSS.CHARINQSTAMFORD STREET AND
reserved.][All rightsPREFACE.
WHEN this work first itappeared, three-and-twenty years ago,
became at once an of unmerited and ofabuse,object equally
unmerited Small divines it for an insidiouspraise. mistaking
"
to overthrow as law established,"attempt opinions by spurted
at it with in the milk of the under
; whilst,pens dipped Gospel
"
"
the same Friends of lauded it tohallucination,very Light
the skies either both of theparty equally ignorant subject,
and of the of labours. One noted Zoiluspurpose my (whose
recollections of Homer would seem to be of the same deeply-
marked nature as Blifil is atEnsign disgusted my citings)
" "
of the anotherAidoneus as a title of the God Shades is;
astonished at in Bardanes a Persian,ignorance callingmy
he notwhereas was a native of Pontus that; understanding
was valid in of the mistake Pontusmy argument equally spite
a of the of and whatDarius,being empireoriginally province
is whence Mithraicismmore to the the actual focuspurpose,
diffused itself over the Eoman world.
the book wasA still cause ofgreater outcry against my
to hands the Sacred Ark ofpresuming uponlay presumptuous
"
that the Free andandMasonry, openly express my opinion
"
of these times have no more real connexion with theAccepted
ancient likeoutof whose terms and forms, fig-leaves,Craft, they
thehave stitched wherewith to cover real
together aprons,
the Italian Carbonari ofnakedness of their thanpretension,
whoseMurat s had with the trade of charcoal burners,day
President s throne.baskets were borrowed for the King
the cistaHiram s skull his teeth with withinragegnashed
the course ofand one valiant Levite of Abia,;mystica youngVI PREFACE.
"thus to confute all assertions : Athelstanproceeds logically my
built a church : he could not build without masons
; argal,
Athelstan was the of infounder Masonry England.
But of this the same treatment is in store;enough necessarily
for the edition it must look furpresent ;
"
lamina, taedae."Verbera, carnifices, robur, pix,
The one reviewer of its who exhibited anypredecessor acquain
tance with the literature of the felt himself hissubject, (from
"
"
in bound to his theposition) duty qualify praise by passing
"
that I had in the work more ofsummary judgment displayed
the of a ThisGnostic than of a Catholic Christian."spirit
intended for I as thesentence, condemnatory, accept highest
inthat could be to labourspraise given my taking yvwortKos
"
"
its strict sense of one addicted to and who
;knowledge
studies the and remains of fortherefore history any opinion
thethe solo of the truth and not for
;purpose understanding
sake of the under oneTruth can existdemonstrating only
defined form.
Let me now in the Ito state edition,how,proceed present
have endeavoured still further to deservethe attachedappellation
to me Treatise was thethe Aristarchus.by good-natured My
one Gnostic Dr. Walsh s little bookonly upon Archaeology (for
scarce had since Chiflet sdeserves the thatname) appeared
"
"
admirable in his HistoireMatter,Apistopistus (1617);
of thedu Gnosticisme an excellentCritique (1827), analysis
doctrines of the for itsGnosis, monuments,doing nothing
the of theon a reduced scale,beyond republishing, engravings
" The sources of information accessible to
Apistopistus." only
me at the time were the same as thoseof that editionwriting
drawn Matter before the treatises ofme,upon by namely
Irenaeus I have becomeand In the interval,Epiplianius.
in order to havewith, and, master,acquainted thoroughly
made translations two discovered worksof,complete recently
inthat throw much difficult thislight upon many questions
The one is the of allRefutation Heresies,investigation.
ascribed, either to or : its author intiOrigen Hippolytus being
with the which he holds fordoctrinesacquainted upmately