Conflict of Northern and Southern Theories of Man and Society Great Speech, Delivered in New York City

Ward Beecher Henry

Description

pubOne.info present you this new edition. The Eighth Lecture of the Course before the Anti-Slavery Society, was delivered, January 14, 1855, at the Tabernacle, New York, by the Rev. Henry Ward Beecher. The subject, at the present time, is one of peculiar interest, as touching the questions of Slavery and Know-Nothingism, and, together with the popularity of the lecturer, drew together a house-full of auditors.

Informations

• Publié par: Pub One Info
• Date de parution: 06 novembre 2010
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9782819939320
• Langue: English

Extrait

GREAT SPEECH,
DELIVERED IN NEW YORK CITY,
BY
HENRY WARD BEECHER,
ON THE
Conflict of Northern and Southern Theories
OF MAN AND SOCIETY,
January 14, 1855.
ROCHESTER:
STEAM PRESS OF A. STRONG & CO., COR. OFSTATE AND BUFFALO STREETS.
1855.
Conflict of Northern and SouthernTheories
OF MAN AND SOCIETY.
The Eighth Lecture of the Course before theAnti-Slavery Society, was delivered, January 14, 1855, at theTabernacle, New York, by the Rev. Henry Ward Beecher. The subject,at the present time, is one of peculiar interest, as touching thequestions of Slavery and Know-Nothingism, and, together with thepopularity of the lecturer, drew together a house-full ofauditors.
There were a number of gentlemen of distinction,occupying seats on the rostrum— among whom were the Hon. Joshua R.Giddings, James Mott, of Philadelphia, and Mr. Dudley, ofBuffalo.
Mr. Beecher was introduced to the audience by Mr.Oliver Johnson, who said:
Ladies and Gentlemen : The speaker whooccupied this platform on Tuesday evening last, in the course ofhis remarks upon the wide degeneracy of the American Clergy on theSlavery Question, reminded us that there was in a Brooklyn pulpit,a man. We thought you would be glad to see and hear such a raraavis , and therefore have besought him to come hither to-nightto instruct us by his wisdom and move us by his eloquence. I trustthat, whatever you may think of some other parts of the lecture ofWendell Phillips, you will, when this evening's performance isover, be ready at least to confess that in what he said of theBrooklyn preacher he was not more eulogistic than truthful.
Mr. Beecher, on presenting himself, was receivedwith loud and hearty applause. He spoke as follows:
The questions which have provoked discussion amongus for fifty years past have not been questions of fundamentalprinciples, but of the application of principles alreadyascertained. Our debates have been between one way of doing a thingand another way of doing it— between living well and living better;and so through, it has been a question between good and better. Wehave discussed policies, not principles. In Europe, on the otherhand, life-questions have agitated men. The questions of humanrights, of the nature and true foundations of Government, areto-day, in Europe, where they were with our fathers in 1630.
In this respect, there is a moral dignity, and evengrandeur, in the struggles, secretly or openly going on in Italy,Austria, Germany, and France, which never can belong to the merequestions of mode and manner which occupy us— boundary questions,banks, tariffs, internal improvements, currency; all very necessarybut secondary topics. They touch nothing deeper than the pocket. Inthis respect, there would be a marked contrast between the subjectswhich occupy us, and the grander life-themes that dignify Europeanthought, were it not for one subject— Slavery . That is theonly question, in our day and in our community, full of vitalstruggles turning upon fundamental principles .
If Slavery were a plantation-question, concerningonly the master and the slave, disconnected from us, and isolated—then, though we should regret it, and apply moral forces for itsultimate remedy, yet, it would be, (as are questions of the samekind in India or South America, ) remote, constituting a singleelement in that globe of darkness of which this world is the core,and which Christianity is yet to shine through and change to light.But it is not a plantation-question. It is a nationalquestion. The disputes implied by the violent relations between theowner and the chattel may only morally touch us. — But thedisputes between the masters and the Government, and between theGovernment, impregnated with Slavery, and the Northern citizen,these touch us sharply, and if not wisely met, will yet scourge uswith thorns! Indeed, I cannot say that I believe that New Englandand the near North will be affected locally , and immediatelyby an adverse issue of the great national struggle now going on.But the North will be an utterly dead force in the American nation.She will be rolled up in a corner, like a cocoon waiting for itstransmigration. The whole North will become provincial; it will bebut a fringe to a nation whose heart will beat in the South.
But New-England was not raised up by DivineProvidence to play a mean part in the world's affairs.
Remember, that New-England brought to America thoseprinciples which every State in the Union has more or lessthoroughly adopted.
New-England first formed those institutions whichliberty requires for beneficient activity; and from her, bothbefore and since the Revolution, they have been copied throughoutthe Land. Having given to America its ideas and its institutions, Ithink the North is bound to stand by them.
Until 1800, the North had distinctive nationalinfluence, and gave shape, in due measure, to national policy , as she had before to national institutions.
Then she began to recede before the rising ofanother power. For the last fifty years, upon the national platformhave stood arrayed two champions in mortal antagonism— New-Englandand the near North— representing personal freedom, civil liberty,universal education, and a religious spirit which alwayssympathises with men more than with Governments.
The New-England theory of Government has always beenin its element— first, independent men; then democratic townships;next republican States, and, in the end, a Federated Union ofRepublican States. All her economies, her schools, her policy, herindustry, her wealth, her intelligence, have been at agreement withher theory and policy of Government. Yet, New-England, strong athome, compact, educated, right-minded; has gradually lostinfluence, and the whole North with her.
The Southern League of States, have been heldtogether by the cohesive power of Common Wrong. Their industry,their policy, their whole interior, vital economy, have been atvariance with the apparent principles of their own StateGovernments, and with the National Institutions under which theyexist. They have stood upon a narrow basis, always shaking underthem, without general education, without general wealth, withoutdiversified industry. And yet since the year 1800, they havesteadily prevailed against Representative New-England and theNorth. The South, the truest representation of Absolutism underrepublican forms, is mightier in our National Councils and Policyto-day than New-England, the mother and representative of truerepublicanism and the whole free North.
And now it has come to pass that, in the goodprovidence of God, another opportunity has been presented to thewhole North to reassert her place and her influence, and to fillthe institutions of our country with their original and properblood. I do not desire that she should arise and put on herbeautiful garments, because she is my mother, and your mother; notbecause her hills were the first which my childhood saw, that hasnever since beheld any half so dear; nor from any sordid ambition,that she should be great in this world's greatness; nor from anyprofane wish to abstract from the rightful place and influence ofany State, or any section of our whole country. But I think thatGod sent New-England to these shores as his own messenger of mercyto days and ages, that have yet far to come ere they are born! Shehas not yet told this Continent all that is in her heart. She hassat down like Bunyan's Pilgrim, and slept in the bower by the way,and where she slept she has left her roll— God grant that she hathnot lost it there while she slumbered!
By all the love that I bear to the cause of God, andthe glory of his Church, by the yearnings which I have for thewelfare of the human kind, by all the prophetic expectations whichI have of the destiny of this land, God's Almoner of Liberty to theWorld, I desire to see Old Representative New-England, and theaffiliated North, rouse up and do their first works.
Is it my excited ear that hears an airy phantasmwhispering? or do I hear a solemn voice crying out, “ Arise?Shine? thy light is come, and the glory of the Lord is arisen uponthee! ”
I am quite aware that the subject of Slavery hasbeen regarded, by many, as sectional; and the agitation of it inthe North needless, and injurious to our peace and the country'swelfare. Whatever may have been the evils, the agitation has onlycome through men, not from them. It is of God. It isthe underheaving of Providence. Mariners might as well blame you for the swing and toss of their craft when tides troopin or march out of your harbor, as us, for heaving to that tidewhich God swells under us. Tides in the ocean and in human affairsare from celestial bodies and celestial beings.