APAS

European Commission Directorate-General For Mobility And Transport

Description

Strategic Transport: Cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis for nodal centres for passengers
Transport policy
Research policy and organisation

Informations

• Publié par: EUROPEAN-COMMISSION-DIRECTORATE-GENERAL-FOR-MOBILITY-AND-TRANSPORT
• Nombre de lectures: 62
• EAN13: 928277581
• Langue: English
• Poids de l'ouvrage: 5 Mo

Extrait

EUROPEAN
COMMISSION
DlRECIORAÎE-
GENERAL
TRANSPOK! TRANSPORT RESEARCH
APAS
STRATEGIC TRANSPORT
VII — 18
Cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis
for nodal centres for passengers The information contained in this publication does not necessarily reflect either the
position or the views of the European Commission
A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the
Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int)
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1996
ISBN 92-827-7581-X
© ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1996
Printed in Belgium Table of Contents
Executive Summary 1
Chapter 0. Introduction 10
0.1. Scope, Objectives and Presentation of the Study 1
0.2. European Policy Relevant to Investments in Passengers Nodes1
0.3. Peculiarities / Specifications of Nodal Centres for Passengers6
Chapter 1. Review of Existing Methods / State-of-the-Art 22
1.1. The Phase Study 2
1.2. Overview of the Evaluation Techniques used in Projects in Nodal Centres for Passengers 2
1.3. Cost-Benefit Analysis :
1.4. Multi-Criterias3
1.5. CBA versus MCA4
1.6. Research Method
1.7. References 25
1.8. Discussion of Inventory6
1.9. State-of-the-Art in Member States7
Chapter. Measurement Methods - Existing Criteria 31
2.1. Casestudies 3
2.1.1. The Need for Case Studies
2.1.2. Case Study Coverage
2.1.3. The Summary of each Case Study Follows a Similar Format:4
2.1.4. Manchester Airport Rail Link
2.1.5. Fishguard Ferry Terminal Improvements
2.1.6. Lyon Satolas TGV Station9
2.1.7. Munich Airport - Franz Josef Strauss 42
2.1.8. Heathrow Express Extension
2.1.9. Malpensa Airport - Milan8
2.2. Lessons and Issues from the Case Studies 51
2.2.1. Introduction
2.2.2. Summary of Evaluation Topics
2.2.4. Manchester Airport Rail Link 60
2.2.5. Fishguard Ferry Terminal Improvements
2.2.6. Lyon Satolas TGV Station
2.2.7. Munich Airport - Franz Josef Strauss
2.2.8. Heathrow Express Extension
2.2.9. Malpensa Airport- Milan2
Chapter 3. Criteria to be Employed in a European Approach 63
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Objectives of Framework
3.3. General Principles4
3.4. The Evaluation Context 6
3.5. Then Procedure5
3.6. The Impact of the Passenger Node on those Potentially Affected 66
3.7. The Type of Evaluation Framework8
III Chapter 4. The Proposed European Approach 69
4.1. Cost-Benefit Analysis Style
4.2. Multi-Criterias Style 70
4.3. Practical Application of the Framework2
4.4. Harmonisation of APAS Work4
Chapter 5. Conclusions - Recommendations6
5.1. Outline
5.2. The Present Situation
5.3. Recommendations
5.4. Future Considerations 77
5.5. In Conclusion8
IV Figures
Figure 0.1: Organisation of the 'hub and spoke' system 18
Figure 0.2: Connecting and accessing systems
Figure 2.1 : Location of Case Studies in Europe 32
Figure 2.2: Rail access to Manchester airport5
Figure 2.3: Ferry links between UK and Eire7
Figure 2.4: The central position of Satolas 40
Figure 2.5: Design of Munich Airport
Figure 2.6: Location of Munich airport and local transport network3
Figure 2.7: The Heathrow Express and Proposed Extension Paddington to Heathrow 46
Figure 2.8: Airports in and near Northern Italy and in the Milan Area9
Tables
Table 0.1 : Relationship between Passenger Nodes and Transport Modes 21
Table 1.1 : Proposition of Classification of Nodal Centres 24
Table 1.2: Criteria in use in the project-evaluations of the member states, Austria and Norway 29
Table 2.1: Case study coverage 33
Table 2.2: Actual and Potential Evaluation Topics 52
Table 2.3: Project Description
Table 2.4: Decision Making Process5
Table 2.5: Impacts Assessed - Financial Appraisal6
Table 2.6:sd - Cost-Benefit Analysis7
Table 2.7: Impacts Assessed - Multi-Criterias8
Table 2.8: Policy 59
Table 3.1: Project Development Process 64
Table 3.2: General Evaluation Procedure
Table 3.3: Impact of Investment on Those Affected
Table 4.1: An Example Cost-Benefit Style Evaluation
Table 4.2: Estimation and Valuation of Benefits - Example 70
Table 4.3: An Example of a Multi-Criteria Style Evaluation1 Appendices
Appendix 1: Discussion of Key Concepts in Phase I Report 79
A1.I.Networks 7
A1.2. Infrastructure
A1.3. Modes
A1.4. Transport Networks on a European Level 80
A1.5. Functional requirements of traffic supply
A1.6. Importance of Nodal Centres in the Passenger Transport System1
A1.7.e of Nodal Centres in Spatial Development2
A1.8. Relation between Structure and Place of Networks and Spatial organisation and development .84
Table A1.1: Bilateral Combinations of Transport Modes
Appendix 2: Evaluation Methods and Criteria for Nodal Centres for Passenger Transport - Phase 1
Report Suggestions 86
A.2.1. General
A.2.2. Regional Development
A.2.3. Development of the Transportation System7
A2.4. Assessment of Aspects of Transport Demand and Supply 88
A2.5. Criteria for the valuation of transportation system aspects9
A2.6. Environmental Impacts 90
A2.7. Assessment Methods2
A2.8. Overall Description of Evaluation Concepts for Nodal Centres on European Level 9
Appendix 3: Inventory of European Evaluation Projects - Phase 1 96
A3.1. Austrian Projects
A3.2. Belgian Projects 97
A3.3. Swiss Projects8
A3.4. Danish Projects
A3.5. German Projects9
A3.6. French Projects 100
A3.7. Greek Projects5
A3.8. Irish Projects
A3.9. Italian Projects „
A3.10. Norwegian Projects
A3.11. Spanish Projects 11
A3.12. Dutch Projects
A3.13. Projects in the United Kingdom2
Table A3.1 : Multi-criteria approach for an investment project in a dense and interdependent
transport network, typical for the urban environment 114
VI Appendix 4: An Illustrative Multi-Criteria Analysis 115
Table A4.1a: Increase of Benefits to the User- existing, transfering and generated 117
Table A4.1b:e of Benefits to the User8
Table A4.1c: Increase of Benefits to the User9
Table A4.1d:e ofs to the User 120
Table A4.2a: Increase of Economic Benefits to the Node Operator 121
Table A4.2b:e ofc Benefits to the Noder2
Table A4.3a: Increase of Benefits to the Society in General3
Table A4.3b:e of Benefits to the Society inl4
Table A4.3c: Increase of Benefits to the Society in General5
Table A4.3d:e of Benefits to the Society inl6
Table A4.4a: Increase of Benefits to the Society in General - Specific Aims on European Level 127
Table A4.4b:e of Benefits to the Society inl - European Level 128
Table A4.4c: Increase of Benefits to the Society in General -n Level9
Table A4.5: Favouring public transport and interconnected modes 12
Appendix 5: Case Studies 130
Manchester Airport Link Case Study 131
1. Introduction1
2. Project Description
3. Decision Making Process5
4. Impacts Assessed6
5. Overall Evaluation of Scheme9
6. Sources
Figure 1: The Location of Manchester Airport and other UK Airports 132
Figure 2: Rail Access tor Airport 133
Figure 3: Greater Manchester, Its Local Authorities and Surrounding Areas4
Fishguard Ferry Terminal Improvements Case Study 140
1. Introduction 140
2. Project Description
3. Decision Making Process1
4. Impacts Assessed4
5. Overall Evaluation of Scheme7
6. Sources
Annex A9
Annex Β 15
vu Lyon Satolas Airport and TGV Link Case Study 153
1. Introduction 153
2. Project Description
3. Decision Making Process: the institutional context 16
4. Impacts Assessed 166
5. Overall Evaluation of Scheme 171
6. Sources2
Figure 1 Evolution of Passenger Traffic at Lyon-Satolas (millions of passengers) 154
Figure 2 Satolas TGV station
Satolas intermodal platform 157 Figure 3
Central position of Satolas8 Figure 4
TGV lines and motorways around Satolas Airport9 Figure 5
Primary high-speed rail links in Europe 160 Figure 6:
Costs to build the Satolas TGV stationFigure 7:
Figure 8 Timescale of construction works
Figure 9 The TGV reforms the European spatial alignment5
Level of service (frequency) and travel times assumptions7 Figure 10
Forecast scenarios for the various functions of the Satolas TGV station and airport 16Figure 11
Reasons given by Firms Relocating to the Satolas Commercial and Industrial Zone 17Figure 12
Heathrow Express Terminal 5 Extension Case Study 173
1. Introduction 173
2. Project Description
3. Decision Making Process4
4. Impacts Assessed8
5. Overall Evaluation of Scheme 181
6. Sources ,18
Figure 1: The Heathrow Express and Proposed Extension: Paddingtonto Heathrow 175
Malpensa Airport Case Study 182
1. Introduction2
2. Project Description 18
3. Decision Making Process 190
4. Range of Impacts Studied1
5. Synthesis of the Impact Of Evaluation on Decision-Making 193
6. References4
Table 1: Summary of Annual Passenger Demand, Growth and Forecasts 18
Table 2: Phasing and Ecu Costs of Malpensa Airport Project9
Figure 1: Airports in and near the Northern Region of Italy and in the Milan Area6
Figure 2: Surface Connection to M