Niveau: Supérieur, Doctorat, Bac+8
Using linear logic to reason about sequent systems ? Dale Miller1 and Elaine Pimentel2 1 Computer Science and Engineering Department, 220 Pond Lab, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-6106 USA 2 Departamento de Matematica, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, M.G. Brasil Abstract. Linear logic can be used as a meta-logic for the specifica- tion of some sequent calculus proof systems. We explore in this paper properties of such linear logic specifications. We show that derivability of one proof system from another has a simple decision procedure that is implemented simply via bounded logic programming search. We also provide conditions to ensure that an encoded proof system has the cut- elimination property and show that this can be decided again by simple, bounded proof search algorithms. 1 Introduction Various logical frameworks based on intuitionistic logic have been proposed [FM88,Pau89,HHP93] and used for specifying natural deduction proof systems. Given the intimate connection between natural deduction and ?-calculus, appli- cations requiring object-level binding and substitutions have also been success- fully implemented in these logical frameworks [Mil00]. In [Mil96], Miller proposed moving from intuitionistic logic to the more ex- pressive setting of linear logic to capture the more general setting of sequent calculus proof system.
- linear logic
- flat forum
- forum
- proof system
- proof systems
- contraction can
- sequents within
- forum sequent