The American Judiciary

Simeon E. Baldwin

Informations

• Publié par: phool
• Publié le: 08 décembre 2010
• Nombre de lectures: 47
• Langue: English

Extrait

Project Gutenberg's The American Judiciary, by
Simeon E. Baldwin, LLD
Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be
sure to check the copyright laws for your country
before downloading or redistributing this or any
other Project Gutenberg eBook.
This header should be the first thing seen when
viewing this Project Gutenberg file. Please do not
remove it. Do not change or edit the header
without written permission.
Please read the "legal small print," and other
information about the eBook and Project
Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is
important information about your specific rights and
restrictions in how the file may be used. You can
also find out about how to make a donation to
Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved.
**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla
Electronic Texts**
**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By
Computers, Since 1971**
*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands
of Volunteers!*****
Title: The American JudiciaryAuthor: Simeon E. Baldwin, LLD
Release Date: August, 2005 [EBook #8691] [Yes,
we are more than one year ahead of schedule]
[This file was first posted on August 1, 2003]
Edition: 10
Language: English
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG
EBOOK THE AMERICAN JUDICIARY ***
Produced by Charles Aldarondo, Tiffany Vergon,
Michael Kaelbling, Charles Franks and the Online
Distributed Proofreading TeamTHE AMERICAN JUDICIARY
BY
SIMEON E. BALDWIN, LL.D.
CONTENTS
PART
CASES CITED.
I. THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE JUDICIAL
POWER IN THE UNITED STATES.
II. THE ORGANIZATION AND PRACTICAL
WORKING OF AMERICAN COURTS.
PART ICHAPTER
I. ENGLISH ORIGIN AND EARLY
DEVELOPMENT OF THE AMERICAN
JUDICIARY.
II. THE SEPARATION OF THE JUDICIAL POWER
FROM THE LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE IN
AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONS.
III. THE RELATIONS OF THE JUDICIARY TO
THE POLITICAL DEPARTMENTS OF
GOVERNMENT.
IV. THE FORCE OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS.
V. THE JUDICIAL POWER OF DEVELOPING
UNWRITTEN LAW.
VI. THE JUDICIAL POWER OF INTERPRETING
AND DEVELOPING WRITTEN LAW.
VII. THE JUDICIAL POWER OF DECLARING
WHAT HAS THE FORM OF LAW NOT TO BE
LAW.
PART II
VIII. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE COURTS OFTHE STATES.
IX. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE COURTS OF
THE UNITED STATES.
X. RELATIONS OF THE STATE JUDICIARY TO
THE UNITED STATES, AND OF THE UNITED
STATES JUDICIARY TO THE STATES.
XI. RELATIONS BETWEEN THE COURTS OF
DIFFERENT STATES.
XII. TRIAL BY JURY.
XIII. FORMALITIES IN JUDICIAL PROCEDURE.
XIV. TRIAL COURTS FOR CIVIL CAUSES.
XV. PROBATE COURTS.
XVI. BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY
COURTS.
XVII. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
XVIII. THE EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL FUNCTIONS
OUT OF COURT.
XIX. APPELLATE COURTS.XX. THE ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS AND
PUNISHMENT OF CONTEMPTS OF COURT.
XXI. JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS IN TERRITORIES
SUBJECT TO MARTIAL LAW.
XXII. APPOINTMENT, TENURE OF OFFICE AND
COMPENSATION OF JUDGES.
XXIII. THE CHARACTER OF THE BAR AND ITS
RELATIONS TO THE BENCH.
XXIV. THE LAW'S DELAYS.
XXV. THE ATTITUDE OF THE PEOPLE
TOWARDS THE JUDICIARY.
INDEX.
* * * * *
TABLE OF CASES
Ableman v. Booth
Allinson, Hale v.
American Insurance Co. v. Canter
Ames v. Kansas
Ames, Smyth v. Andrews, Ex parte
Anthes, Commonwealth v.
Bachert v. Lehigh Coal and Navigation Co.
Baldwin, Robertson v.
Bank, Bardes v.
Bank of Kentucky, Briscoe v.
Bank of Mississippi v. Duncan
Bank of the U. S., Osborn v.
Bardes v. Bank
Barrows v. Bell
Batchelder v. Moore
Baxter v. Brooks
Baxter, State v.
Bean v. Beckwith
Bean, Beckwith v.
Beckham, Taylor v.
Beckwith v. Bean
Beckwith, Bean v.
Bell, Barrows v.
Bell's Gap R. R. Co., McCloskey v.
Bernard, Coggs v.
Biddle, Green v.
Bidwell, Downes v.
Bissell v. Dickerson
Blacker, Board of Supervisors v.
Blair v. Williams
Blake v. McClung
Board of Supervisors v. Blacker
Bodley v. Gaither
Boffman, Hickman v.
Bonham's case
Booth v. Clark
Booth, Ableman v. Borden, Luther v.
Bowman v. Middleton
Boyd v. Thayer
Boyd v. U. S.
Bradburn, Mincey v.
Bradley v. Fisher
Bradley v. New Haven
Bradley, Ex parte
Brainerd, Fitch v.
Branch, In re
Brashears, Lapsley v.
Briggs v. Garrett
Brine v. Insurance Co.
Briscoe v. Bank of Kentucky
Brooks v. State
Brooks, Baxter v.
Brown, Kellogg v.
Brown, Parkersburg v.
Bulkley, State v.
Bull, Calder v.
Burgess v. Seligman
Burr's Trial
Burrows, Nudd v.
Bush, Perry v.
Bushnell, Ex parte
Calder v. Bull
California, Hurtado v.
Call Publishing Co., Western Union Telegraph Co.
v.
Calvin v. Huntley
Canfield v. Mitchell
Canter, American Insurance Co. v.
Carriere, Tua v. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia,
Chisholm v. Georgia
Christmas v. Russell
Church v. Pearne
City of South Bend v. Turner
Claflin v. Houseman
Clark, Booth v.
Clarke's Appeal
Cleveland, Painesville and Eastern R. R. Co., v.
Pritschau
Clymer, Norris v.
Cochran, Gernon v.
Coffin v. United States
Coggs v. Bernard
Cohens v. Virginia
Coleman v. Tennessee
Coler v. Tacoma Railway and Power Co.
Colt, Stanley v.
Commonwealth v. Anthes
Conn. Pipe Mfg. Co., Ward v.
Consul of Spain v. Consul of Great Britain
Cooper, Application of
Cooper, In re
Cooper, In the matter of
Copass, Hall-Moody Institute v.
Croswell, People v.
Cunningham, State v.
Danbury, Hoyt v.
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Debs, U. S. v.
Debs, In re
Delaware, Lackawanna and Western R. R. Co.,
Forepaugh v.