GEMI Benchmark Survey Water Use, Issues & Management

Carl Wirdak

Description

GEMI BenchmarkEnergy & Climate ChangeMay 2006Carl Wirdak Bob Accarino Audrey BambergerOccidental Petroleum Abbott Laboratories Anheuser-BuschOutline• Survey Recap•Energy• Climate• NuggetsEnergy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006 2Survey Overview• Survey addresses the topic of energy management and climate change• Response rate = 55% – Not all companies completed all questions• Thank you to all participants!Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006 3Is energy a strategic issue?Number of Companies• In most companies, energy is an important issue, 414but…not all consider energy to be strategic• Drivers:2 2–Cost– ManagementNo Yes– RegulatoryIs it strategic?No. of companies = 22Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006 4YesNoEnergy is significant –either as a product or cost Has your energy been curtailed?Number of Companies• Energy has been curtailed at some point in the last 2 years at 34about 30% of respondents• At over 40% of companies where 124energy supply has been interrupted, energy is not a No Yesstrategic issueIs it strategic?– sample size is smallNo. of companies = 23Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006 5YesNoEnergy has been curtailedEnergy strategy elementsInternal communicationInternal communicationand programsConservationCost controlCost controlGreenhouse gas goals/impactsBenchmarkingBenchmarkingPolicy commitmentExternal communicationExternal communicationSupply assurance ...

Informations

• Publié par: Syaj
• Nombre de lectures: 14
• Langue: English

Extrait

GEMI Benchmark

Energy & Climate Change

Carl Wirdak Occidental Petroleum

May 2006

Bob Accarino Abbott Laboratories

Audrey Bamberger Anheuser-Busch

Outline

•

•

•

•

Survey Recap

Energy

Climate

Nuggets

Energy & Climate Benchmarking –

May 2006

2

Survey Overview

•

•

•

Survey addresses the topic of energy management and climate change

Response rate = 55% – Not all companies completed all questions

Thank you to all participants!

Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006

3

napmoc tsom nI• ?  aisy rgne   e s,ie yga nereI sssueic iateg str renet ygisno red egat •D icbe o  tr s na tsius  n mioptr ot all  c e,  but…n uNbm ry– tnemega otalugeR : – rsveri an–M stCo

4

Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006

No. of companies = 22

Yes Is it strategic?

No

14

4

2

2

 oerCof anmpsie

pani   com % ofr 40 gr ye   en ehersew  n ee   b as hlyppsu ene  ,detpurretni t  in the ome poin eyra stal sa t 2  o0% re f bo   a 3ut tA• s evo  nopstned muebN Comr ofespani

No. of companies = 23

Yes Is it strategic?

5

Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006

12

3

4

No

4

gr ysin toa  s   rtategic issue –sam elpezis si lamsl led at s n  curtai h sab ee• ? nEreyg tauredilbey  cene rugrenaHoy s

ygetarts ygrenEsment ele rkmag P in s B ct chen timmtnemcilooc y reenhous control Gla/smiap eag sog n C ioaticunmmcol   tsoC noitavresno reanItn ssi  E seu grener-ytelated nochgylo emgrni grtnesda nd global energy s/ecnarubaniatsuofy itily E plup s nrlaxEetuminc moon Su cati  asspply

80%

her

6

100%

% 20% 40% Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006

60%

vement Ot i yclovn cililop is r ub k P itolaliceGpo irgntren dapg anndinl fuernatxE tupni redloheakSt ntmeopelev d

Major drivers for the way energy is managed

Bottom-up Cost Savings

Top-down Energy Directive

Top-down GHG Directive

Shareholder Inquiry

Stakeholder Inquiry

0 20 40 60 80 100 Energy is managed to meet company priorities, not stakeholder expectations

Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006

7

Who is involved in energy management

Who leads the effort?

Sites

Energy

EHS

Engineering

Facilities

Various

0%

20% 40% 60%

•

•

Energy teams at: (87%) Site level (74%) Corporate (50%) Combined site and corporate Information sharing a) Meetings & conference calls b) Corporate staff group facilitated sharing c) Websites & newsletters

Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006

8

Energy-related websites

• • • • • • • • • • •

DOE (EIA, EERE Industrial Technologies Program) EPA (Energy Star, Climate Leaders, Green Power Partnership) WRI, WBCSD, Pew Center GEMI, BRT Climate RESOLVE U.S. Green Building Council Climatebiz.com PointCarbon Carbon Trust UNFCCC / IPCC NYMEX Pricing Website (track futures pricing) Various energy trend websites to track geopolitical, weather, and demand issues

Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006

9

Energy goals

Doesc ompany

energy goals?

h 

No Yes,  17% internal  only 22%

Yes, publicly available 61%

ave 

•

•

Most companies intend to maintain or reduce energy consumption – Baselines generally do not pre-date 2001 – Most goals are normalized to production or sales – Most target 5-10% reduction – Some have annual targets, others have just an endpoint target date Some tied to greenhouse gas emissions reductions

Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006

10

Renewable energy usage

Landfill gas

Hydroelectric

Geothermal

Co-generation

Biomass

Wind

Solar

0

3

Generate

6 Number of responses

Energy & Climate Benchmarking – May 2006

9

Purchase

12

11