OAG08-Audit Group 4

Kruss

Description

Hay Group Insight2008 Employee Survey EOffice of the Auditor General of CanadaOrganization Group: Audit Group 4June, 2008© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights ReservedTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageI. Overview of ResultsResponse RateProfile ChartsII. Detailed Results Overall Rating 1Perceived Impact of Work 2Vision and Direction of the Office 3Office Values 5Personal Values 7Management of the Office 8© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved1 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageII. Detailed Results (continued)Organizational Intentions 10Work Unit 11Supervision 14Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives 18Career Management 22Career Progress 24Promotion Process 28Resource allocation 29Pressures at work 30Stress 32© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved2 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPage II. Detailed Results (continued)Work/Life Balance 32Work Arrangements 33Work Environment 34Harassment 35Discrimination 36Respectful Workplace 37Language of Work 38Official Languages 39Language Training 41Departures 43Concluding Impressions 44© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved3 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYI. Overview of ResultsHay Group InsightResponse RateNumber of Percentage of Number of Number ofRespondents Respondents Respondents Respondents2008 2008 2006 2004___________________________________________________________Total OAG 555 ...

Sujets

• management

Informations

• Publié par: Anfo
• Nombre de lectures: 10
• Langue: English

Extrait

Hay GroupInsight

2008Employee Survey Officeof the Auditor General of Canada

Organization Group: Audit Group 4

© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved

June, 2008

I. O

Response Rate Profile Charts

Hay GroupInsight

Table of Contents

1 2 3 5 7 8

Page

II. Detailed Results Overall Rating Perceived Impact of Work Vision and Direction of the Office Office Values Personal Values Management of the Office

002©yaH8orG1iRhgstRsereev O dupLimited.All YEVRUS8002AGEEOYPLEM ivwevreeRusofstl

iLpuorGyaH8002htigRllAd.temi2© YE de AOG02 seResvr YEESURV08EMPLO

Page

II. Detailed Results (continued) Organizational Intentions Work Unit Supervision Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives Career Management Career Progress Promotion Process Resource allocation Pressures at work Stress

10 11 14 18 22 24 28 29 30 32

Table of Contents

Hay GroupInsight

puLGorH8ya2©00ghRilAl.editim 2GAO devreseRst3 008MELPYOEESRUVEY

Page

Table of Contents

II. Detailed Results (continued) Work/Life Balance Work Arrangements Work Environment Harassment Discrimination Respectful Workplace Language of Work Official Languages Language Training Departures Concluding Impressions

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 43 44

Hay GroupInsight

08EMPLO ed OAG20YEEYEUSVR Ad.temiLipouGrvreseRsthgiRll4aHy0280©

Audit Group 4 - Thompson

I. Overview of Results

Response Rate

Total OAG

Hay GroupInsight

28 72%

38

28

555 93%

545

450

Number of Percentage of Number of Number of Respondents Respondents Respondents Respondents 2008 2008 2006 2004 ___________________________________________________________

theresuaredto lty ocpm ebdrice .nsheTizanioatrehtgrostlofo7 gro ineredlustercsnatsoiqeu li0leddmieThƒ .srotcafrospu seResvrde AOG02 mited.AllRight YEE08LOMPEYERVSU vreioevrastwhchefƒTwingollotsnoitsnactahrimaumsue8q2ze foepmeecregatnrhopoesyelowesuoarlbydndefvadtheovinOAGan batad yaHllare meAthorNofkanazitaginnroirac rtschaƒThe ons. ineicndesathetyaHroNofmhtratgroupofitem.s Tƒehpolttderitsuleseaticndffideht(ecnereentpercatiodeviteew)nbeh p net naMareearCorctafehtrofnosirompaalcorichistnoersiTƒeh no.s espronsiinudImgCehlcnofnotrocomparistorical0260hsi egemtn ƒ . divorperevognisontiesilwhdanunbmfafuqreoanaaregeovera epsificuqcitsekasspreseontosfoterdn,scnam all indications ofrlierpfohtemayoupsegrthes evrusllatolposhuts,orctfay elpm.etebocni

Hay GroupInsight

Profiled Factors

onaautiestisqu-04no1ontaws orctfasbldoush etaert e chtiwd theremaybeinsfuificnetadatt keasind002 ƒF 6. sroemouorg,sp 2008HayGroupLi©5

de AOG02 seResvrllRightmited.A YEEYERVSUE08LOMP ©GroupLi2008Hay6

-30

OAG 2008

OAG 2006

OAG 2004

-10

-20

Overall Results - Total OAG

10

20

Concluding Impressions

0

Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office

Supervision

Career Management

Monetary & Non- Monetary Incentives  Resource allocation

Stress

30

Supervision

Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office

30

Career Management

Resource allocation

Monetary & Non- Monetary Incentives

20

-20

-10

Stress

Concluding Impressions

0

10

-30

2008

2006

2004

Organization Group: Audit Group 4

thgiRllvreseRs 20GOA ed LOMPE08USVREYEYE 7©0280aHyGroupLimited.A

HayGroup

Q. 1a1 Overall, how would you rate the Office as an organization to work for?

Organization Group 1a-Overall Rating

11% 1% +6 +18 +28 +24

Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff r  Pub fromfrom from G oup Valid N  Below AverageAboveAverage Average  Sec Norm2006 2004

Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28

88%

86%

Q. 1a2 How would you rate the Office as a place to work now, compared with two years ago?

14% -1 +8 +26 +22

Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff m  Pub fromfrom from About the sa e It's Not as Good Now  Sec2006 2004 Norm

6% -8 +4 - +3

Group Valid N It's Better Now

56%

Total Office of the Auditor 43238% General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 2417%

13% -24 -20 - -18

70%

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

Page 1

nospmohTfor:AuResultsp4oRnidtrGuo

dit:Aup4GrouRsefrolustnoRmohTnosp

Total Office of the Auditor 548 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28

91%

86%

Q. 1b2 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization where I can clearly perceive the effectiveness of my work Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff al from from Pub from GroupV id N Very Satisfied at all Satisfied Neutral Not  Norm Sec2006 2004

Organization Group 1b-Perceived Impact of work

HayGroup

8% 1% +7 +4 - -

Q. 1b1 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization that contributes to the public good Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff GroupValid N  Not at all SatisfiedVery Satisfied Neutral ceS buPmro 042006 fm 02 for rm from No

79%

14% 7% +18 +5 +2 -5

Page 2

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

75%

19% 6% +16 +22 -2 -9

10% 4% -9 -10 - -

Total Office of the Auditor 547 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28

10% 4% -1 -10 - -

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

6% 1% +2 +9 - +34

7% +1 -3 - +34

Diff Diff Diff Diff Tend to Disagree morffmroPbu S  ce m No fro rm 2006 2004

6% 1% +3 +9 - -

Page 3

Total Office of the Auditor 553 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28

HayGroup

Diff Diff Diff Diff T n ub e d to Disagree Sec04 P oNmr formfmroorf 02 m 6002

Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28

93%

93%

86%

93%

Q. 1c2 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I have a good understanding of the vision and values of the Office Percent of Respondents GroupValid N  Agree nor NeitherTend to Agree Disagree

Percent of Respondents Neither Agree nor Disagree

Q. 1c3 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I support the vision and values of the Office Group Valid N Tend to Agree

19% 8% +2 +11 - -

Diff Diff Diff Diff  e from from Pub from Tend to Disagre  Norm Sec2006 2004

Total Office of the Auditor 55173% General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 2857%

29% 14% -9 -4 - -

Q. 1c1 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I understand where the Office is going over the next two years Percent of Respondents GroupValid N  Neither Agree norTend to Agree Disagree

Organization Group 1c-Vision and Direction of the Office

oup4RoAuditGrstfro:RselupsomThnon