OAG08-Audit Group 9

Kruss

Description

Hay Group Insight2008 Employee Survey EOffice of the Auditor General of CanadaOrganization Group: Audit Group 9June, 2008© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights ReservedTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageI. Overview of ResultsResponse RateProfile ChartsII. Detailed Results Overall Rating 1Perceived Impact of Work 2Vision and Direction of the Office 3Office Values 5Personal Values 7Management of the Office 8© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved1 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageII. Detailed Results (continued)Organizational Intentions 10Work Unit 11Supervision 14Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives 18Career Management 22Career Progress 24Promotion Process 28Resource allocation 29Pressures at work 30Stress 32© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved2 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPage II. Detailed Results (continued)Work/Life Balance 32Work Arrangements 33Work Environment 34Harassment 35Discrimination 36Respectful Workplace 37Language of Work 38Official Languages 39Language Training 41Departures 43Concluding Impressions 44© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved3 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYI. Overview of ResultsHay Group InsightResponse RateNumber of Percentage of Number of Number ofRespondents Respondents Respondents Respondents2008 2008 2006 2004___________________________________________________________Total OAG 555 ...

Sujets

• management

Informations

• Publié par: Niseng
• Nombre de lectures: 27
• Langue: English

Extrait

Hay GroupInsight

2008Employee Survey Officeof the Auditor General of Canada

Organization Group: Audit Group 9

© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved

June, 2008

I. O

Response Rate Profile Charts

Hay GroupInsight

Table of Contents

1 2 3 5 7 8

Page

II. Detailed Results Overall Rating Perceived Impact of Work Vision and Direction of the Office Office Values Personal Values Management of the Office

002©yaH8orG1iRhgstRsereev O dupLimited.All YEVRUS8002AGEEOYPLEM ivwevreeRusofstl

iLpuorGyaH8002htigRllAd.temi2© YE de AOG02 seResvr YEESURV08EMPLO

Page

II. Detailed Results (continued) Organizational Intentions Work Unit Supervision Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives Career Management Career Progress Promotion Process Resource allocation Pressures at work Stress

10 11 14 18 22 24 28 29 30 32

Table of Contents

Hay GroupInsight

puLGorH8ya2©00ghRilAl.editim 2GAO devreseRst3 008MELPYOEESRUVEY

Page

Table of Contents

II. Detailed Results (continued) Work/Life Balance Work Arrangements Work Environment Harassment Discrimination Respectful Workplace Language of Work Official Languages Language Training Departures Concluding Impressions

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 43 44

Hay GroupInsight

08EMPLO ed OAG20YEEYEUSVR Ad.temiLipouGrvreseRsthgiRll4aHy0280©

I. Overview of Results

Total OAG

Audit Group 9 - Lennox

Number of Percentage of Number of Number of Respondents Respondents Respondents Respondents 2008 2008 2006 2004 ___________________________________________________________

Response Rate

Hay GroupInsight

25 71%

43

26

555 93%

545

450

heresulredtot yl c  moap eidertc s.eThzaniontirehagroosttof grou in7redusteelcsraitnouqse inl0edlidmheTƒ .srotcafrosp Rsereev O d GA200 ited.AllRights YEM8OYPLSEEVEUR ivwevoretrscahefoƒThingllowhtsnoitbnactaizarmmsuesqu28e folpmenecregatreoonspeeoywhsrubaylieddafovtheovenOAGand abatad yaHllar erAmhrtNofonktaoinaziogrcina tsacharThe ns. ƒ inecadisteethyaHmroNrofahttgroupofitems ƒ . hTelptoetderinsltsuttecadieffidehp(ecnerntdercetioneviawtee)ebe ep nht aganMerreCartocafehtrofnosimparlcoricaistoonhieshTre sn ƒ . ssrensiongdimpIoCeulcnofnhtromparisooricalc006ihts mene.t 2ƒ idivorparevognansiostlehiwndmuebanqeurfonavreaeoferag cepscifieuqoitsrskpoesesnsotfrtnesd,acnam ll indicationso rotelforifehpmayupsgrohese yevrusllatolp t usth,rstoacf telp

Hay GroupInsight

.eiebmocn

Profiled Factors

nasutiostioque4-wn01toasan rstoacfbedulho detaert  achtiw heremaybeinsuffcieitndtaaot edskni0620 Fo . ƒosrgempuort,s 008HayGroupLim2©5

O d GA200 RsereevlRightsited.Al YSEEVEUREM8OYPL 2©roupLim008HayG6

-30

OAG 2008

OAG 2006

OAG 2004

-10

-20

Overall Results - Total OAG

Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office

0

10

Concluding Impressions

Supervision

Monetary & Non- Monetary Incentives  Resource allocation

30

Career Management

20

Stress

Monetary & Non- Monetary Incentives

Supervision

Stress

30

Career Management

Resource allocation

10

20

-20

-10

Concluding Impressions

0

-30

2008

2006

2004

Organization Group: Audit Group 9

Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office

sthgiRlevreseR 002AG d OOYPLEM8RUEVEESY 72©00H8yaGroupLimited.Al

HayGroup

Q. 1a1 Overall, how would you rate the Office as an organization to work for?

Organization Group 1a-Overall Rating

11% 1% +6 +18 +28 +24

Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff r  Pub fromfrom from G oup Valid N  AverageAboveAverage Average Below 2006 2004 Sec Norm

Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 9Andrew Lennox 25

88%

Q. 1a2 How would you rate the Office as a place to work now, compared with two years ago?

84%

16% +5 +15 +24 +20

Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff m  Pub fromfrom from About the sa e It's Not as Good Now 2006 2004 Sec Norm

6% -8 +4 - +3

It's Better Now

Group Valid N

56%

38%

Total Office of the Auditor 432 General (OAG) Audit Group 9Andrew Lennox 17

12% +8 +27 - +12

41%

47%

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

Page 1

xonneLwfor:AudResults9AdnertiGorpu

or:tsftGrAudiseluRxnopuonA9werdneL

8% 1% +7 +4 - -

Q. 1b1 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization that contributes to the public good Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff GroupValid N  Neutral NotVery Satisfied at all Satisfied buP 2 mo 4006 fromfr 00  2m from NorSec

Total Office of the Auditor 548 General (OAG) Audit Group 9Andrew Lennox 24

91%

Organization Group 1b-Perceived Impact of work

HayGroup

+6 +18 -9 -16

24%

75%

Total Office of the Auditor 547 General (OAG) Audit Group 9Andrew Lennox 25

19% 6% +16 +22 -2 -9

13% 4% +7 -13 - -

Q. 1b2 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization where I can clearly perceive the effectiveness of my work Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff V from from Pub from Groupalid N  at all Satisfied Not NeutralVery Satisfied 2006 2004 Norm Sec

83%

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

Page 2

8%

68%

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

8% +6 +19 - -

6% 1% +3 +9 - -

Diff Diff Diff Diff Di  Pub fromfrom from Tend to sagree 2006 2004 Sec Norm

4% +12 +16 - +37

6% 1% +2 +9 - +34

Diff Diff Diff Diff T D from from Pub end to isagree rmNo mro 20 f 06Sce0240

HayGroup

Total Office of the Auditor 553 General (OAG) Audit Group 9Andrew Lennox 25

Page 3

92%

93%

96%

Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 9Andrew Lennox 25

Percent of Respondents Neither Agree nor Disagree

Q. 1c3 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I support the vision and values of the Office Group Valid N Tend to Agree

93%

19% 8% +2 +11 - -

24% 16% -7 -9 - -

Total Office of the Auditor 55173% General (OAG) Audit Group 9Andrew Lennox 2560%

Q. 1c2 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I have a good understanding of the vision and values of the Office Percent of Respondents GroupValid N  NeitherTend to Agree Agree nor Disagree

Organization Group 1c-Vision and Direction of the Office

Q. 1c1 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I understand where the Office is going over the next two years Percent of Respondents GroupValid N  Agree norTend to Agree Neither Disagree

Diff Diff Diff Diff Tend to Disagree ombPumorf Sc  N  ro rrffmo 2006 2004 e m

tsfor:ResulneLwerdxonGrtdiAuAn9pou