Understanding and Responding to OFCCP s Final Standards on Systemic  Compensation Discrimination and
29 pages
English

Understanding and Responding to OFCCP's Final Standards on Systemic Compensation Discrimination and

-

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
29 pages
English
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

Description

Understanding and Responding to OFCCP’sFinal Standards on Systemic Compensation Discrimination and Voluntary Compensation Self-Audit GuidelinesPresentersMark S. DichterPhiladelphia, PAPhone: 215.963.5291Email: mdichter@morganlewis.comWilliam E. Doyle, Jr.Washington, DCPhone: 202.739.5208Email: wdoyle@morganlewis.comWebcast Overview• Summary of new Compensation Standards and Voluntary Self-Audit Guidelines• Practical impact on employers• Recommendations New Compensation Standards • Govern OFCCP Compensation Audits• “Definitive Interpretation” of Executive Order 11246– Cannot be modified without notice and comment– Subject to judicial review under APAVoluntary Self-Audit Guidelines• Incentive for contractors to conduct self-audits using methods recommended by OFCCP• Can be changed without notice and comment proceduresSummary of Compensation Standards• Similarly Situated Employee Groupings (“SSEGs”)• Multiple Regression Analysis (“MRA”)• Legitimate factors included in the MRA• Anecdotal evidence• OFCCP’s investigation processesSimilarly Situated Employee Groupings (“SSEGs”)• Similar work• Positions involving similar skills, qualifications and responsibility levels– Skills and qualifications involved in position, not particular to incumbent employees• Additional factors:– Department or other business unit• Budget constraints– Employment status (e.g., part-time vs. full-time)– Compensation status (e.g., salaried, hourly, ...

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 24
Langue English

Extrait

UnderstandingandRespondingtoOFCCPs FinalStandardsonSystemicCompensationDiscrimination andVoluntary CompensationSelf-AuditGuidelines
Presenters
arS.Dichter Philadelphia,PA Phone:..Email:mdichtermorganleis.com
WilliamE.Doyle,Jr. Washington,DC Phone:..Email:doy lemorganleis.com
Wecast
Oerie
SummaryofnewCompensationStandardsand VoluntarySelf-AuditGuidelines
Practicalimpactonemployers
Recommendations
e
CompensationStandards
GovernOFCCP CompensationAudits
“DefinitiveInterpretation” ofExecutiveOrder11246
– Cannotbemodifiedwithoutnoticeandcomment
– SubjecttojudicialreviewunderAPA
VoluntarySelf-AuditGuidelines
Incentiveforcontractorstoconductself-auditsusin methodsrecommendedbyOFCCP
Canbechanedwithoutnoticeandcomment procedures
Summary ofCompensationStandards
SimilarlySituatedEmployeeGroupins
ultipleReressionAnalysisRA
eitimatefactorsincludedinthe RA
Anecdotalevidence
OFCCP s investiationprocesses
“SSEGs”
Similarly SituatedEmployeeGroupings   SSEGs 
ility
o
Similarwor Positionsinvolvinsimilarsillsualificationsandresponsib levels – Sillsandualificationsinvolvedinpositionnotparticulart incumbentemployees Additionalfactors – Departmentorotherbusinessunit • udetconstraints Employmentstatusepart-timevsfull-time – Compensationstatusesalariedhourlycommissioned PreferenceforSSEGs ofemployeesandofeachcomparator roup everroupdissimilaremployeestoreachpreference
u
ltipleRegressionAnalysis  R A
OFCCP preferenceforRA bySSEG – i llusea“pooled” reressiontomeetobjectiveofcoverin ofemployeesunderreview Pooledreressionnotpreferredorintendedforwidespreaduse – OFCCP willtestifinteractiontermsarereuired “Chow est ” – i llonlyincludestatisticallysinificantinteractionterms • Severalinteractionsmayonlybestatisticallysinificantin combination
wostandarddeviationthresholdforstatisticalsinificance
Includeleitimatefactorswhichinfluencecompensation
egitimateFactorsnfluencingCompensation
OFCCP willinvestiatetodeterminefactorsoncase -by-casebasis
Factorsneednotbeovertlyconsideredinacompensationdecision – udetconstraints – Employer scompensationpolicies – OFCCP willtestforastatistically-sinificantcorrelationbetween compensationandthefactor
opresumptionthatafactorwithintheemployer  scontrolis“tainted” bydiscrimination – Correlationbetweenfactorandprotectedclassificationisnotenouh toestablishmustbeindependentproof
egitimateFactorsnfluencingCompensation --Eamples
Education – Relevanceofdereetocurrentposition Experience ocation Performance Productivity Sinificantleavesofabsence Employmentwithpredecessorcompany
AnecdotalEidence
OFCCP willinvestiatetofindexamplesofcompensation discriminationaainstparticularindividuals
ot “smoinun ” directevidenceofdiscrimination
OFCCP Expressesa“StronPreference ” forAnecdotal EvidencetoSupportStatisticalEvidence– ExpectationthatOFCCP willfindanecdotalevidence
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents