Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study
8 pages
English

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
8 pages
English
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

A considerable number of patients with severely elevated LDL-C do not achieve recommended treatment targets, despite treatment with statins. Adults at high cardiovascular risk with hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C ≥ 2.59 and ≤ 4.14 mmol/L (N = 250), pretreated with atorvastatin 20 mg were randomized to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg or atorvastatin 40 mg for 6 weeks. The percent change in LDL-C and other lipids was assessed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis method with terms for treatment, time, time-by-treatment interaction, stratum, and time-by-stratum interaction. Percentage of subjects achieving LDL-C < 1.81 mmol/L, < 2.00 mmol/L, or < 2.59 mmol/L was assessed using a logistic regression model with terms for treatment and stratum. Tolerability was assessed. Results Switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin resulted in significantly greater changes in LDL-C (-26.81% vs.-11.81%), total cholesterol (-15.97% vs.-7.73%), non-HDL-C (-22.50% vs.-10.88%), Apo B (-17.23% vs.-9.53%), and Apo A-I (2.56% vs.-2.69%) vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (all p ≤ 0.002), but not HDL-C, triglycerides, or hs-CRP. Significantly more subjects achieved LDL-C < 1.81 mmol/L (29% vs. 5%), < 2.00 mmol/L (38% vs. 9%) or < 2.59 mmol/L (69% vs. 41%) after switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (all p < 0.001). The overall safety profile appeared generally comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions In high cardiovascular risk subjects with hypercholesterolemia already treated with atorvastatin 20 mg but not at LDL-C < 2.59 mmol/L, switching to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg provided significantly greater LDL-C lowering and greater achievement of LDL-C targets compared with doubling the atorvastatin dose to 40 mg. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Trial registration Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00782184

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Publié le 01 janvier 2012
Nombre de lectures 44
Langue English

Extrait

Hing Linget al.Lipids in Health and Disease2012,11:18 http://www.lipidworld.com/content/11/1/18
R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, doubleblind, activecontrolled, multicenter study 1* 2 3 4 5 Paul Kah Hing Ling , Fernando Civeira , Andrei Gheorghe Dan , Mary E Hanson , Rachid Massaad , 5 4 4 Celine Le Bailly De Tilleghem , Christopher Milardo and Joseph Triscari
Abstract Background:A considerable number of patients with severely elevated LDLC do not achieve recommended treatment targets, despite treatment with statins. Adults at high cardiovascular risk with hypercholesterolemia and LDLC2.59 and4.14 mmol/L (N = 250), pretreated with atorvastatin 20 mg were randomized to ezetimibe/ simvastatin 10/40 mg or atorvastatin 40 mg for 6 weeks. The percent change in LDLC and other lipids was assessed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis method with terms for treatment, time, timebytreatment interaction, stratum, and timebystratum interaction. Percentage of subjects achieving LDLC < 1.81 mmol/L, < 2.00 mmol/L, or < 2.59 mmol/L was assessed using a logistic regression model with terms for treatment and stratum. Tolerability was assessed. Results:Switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin resulted in significantly greater changes in LDLC (26.81% vs.11.81%), total cholesterol (15.97% vs.7.73%), nonHDLC (22.50% vs.10.88%), Apo B (17.23% vs.9.53%), and Apo AI (2.56% vs.2.69%) vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (allp0.002), but not HDLC, triglycerides, or hsCRP. Significantly more subjects achieved LDLC < 1.81 mmol/L (29% vs. 5%), < 2.00 mmol/L (38% vs. 9%) or < 2.59 mmol/L (69% vs. 41%) after switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (allp< 0.001). The overall safety profile appeared generally comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions:In high cardiovascular risk subjects with hypercholesterolemia already treated with atorvastatin 20 mg but not at LDLC < 2.59 mmol/L, switching to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg provided significantly greater LDLC lowering and greater achievement of LDLC targets compared with doubling the atorvastatin dose to 40 mg. Both treatments were generally welltolerated. Trial registration:Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00782184 Keywords:Ezetimibe/simvastatin, Atorvastatin, High cardiovascular risk, Primary hypercholesterolemia, Lipid lowering
* Correspondence: pkhling@yahoo.co.uk 1 School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University, 80100 Johor Bahru, Malaysia Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2012 Ling et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents