La lecture à portée de main
Description
Sujets
Informations
Publié par | les_archives_du_savoir |
Nombre de lectures | 7 |
Licence : | |
Langue | English |
Poids de l'ouvrage | 10 Mo |
Extrait
(Toronto Slnibcrsttp
BYI'RKSKNTED
The University of Cambridge
the Committee inthrough formed
the Old Country
to ttiJ in the loss caused the /)isnsfn>its Fin-replacing by
theof 1'thruary 14th,FROM SHAKESPEARE
TO POPECLAY ANDC. SON,J.
PRESS WAREHOUSE,UNIVERSITYCAMBRIDGE
LANE.AVE MARIA
AND CO.DEIGHTON, BELLCambttbflt:
. A. BROCKHAUS.FROM SHAKESPEARE
AN INTOINQUIRY
THE CAUSES AND PHENOMENA OF THE RISE
OF POETRY INCLASSICAL ENGLAND
EDMUND M.A.GOSSE,
CLARK LECTURER IN ENGLISH LITERATURE AT
TRINITY CAMBRIDGECOLLEGE,
CAMBRIDGE
AT THE PRESSUNIVERSITY
1885
[All reserved.']rights(Eatttbrfoge:
M.A. ANDPRINTED HV C. CLAY, SON,J.
THE UNIVERSITY PRESSiATPREFACE.
THE inwere written thefollowing chapters
form of and delivered towere firstlectures,
inmembers of the ofUniversity Cambridge,
the Hall of Michael-Trinity College, during
mas Term last formed in-year. They my
course as Clark Lecturer. In theaugural
month of December I read at thethem
Lowell inInstitute and theBoston, during
same in or in beforewinter, whole, part,
other academic audiences in beforeAmerica,
the in Baltimore,Johns Hopkins University
in New before Yale Connec-York, College,
and elsewhere.ticut,
It has been no small to meadvantage
that the listeners toamong distinguished
G. bvi Preface.
honour ofI have had thewhom reading
have been more than a fewtherethese pages
have rendered themstudieswhose special
acute in the links ofcriticisingparticularly
In of such criti-consequencemy argument.
I have been able to revisecism, profitably
the to add evidence where it seemedwork,
to remove rash statements and to
wanting,
remould sentences. Above Iall,ambiguous
have a deal of care to the accu-given great
in the form of notes andmulation, appendices,
of historical and critical data of a kind too
for the of a butparticular lecture,purposes
I withoutnot, tohope, genuine importance
the student of the of literature. Inhistory
an of this exactenquiry nature, evidence,
even of a minute inkind, outweighs import-
ance of mere criticalany expression opinion.
The criticism of which I havefriendly spoken
has not, however, shaken me in the slightest
with todegree central idea. Onregard my
the the effect of minutecontrary, controversy