Mammo Benchmark-2005 TOC
1 page
Slovak

Mammo Benchmark-2005 TOC

-

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
1 page
Slovak
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

Description

2005 Mammography Benchmark Table of Contents Mammography Procedure Volume 1 Distribution of Mammography Procedures and Sites in ~1,000 Sites Surveyed, by Site Type, 2005 ...........................1 Projected Mammography Procedure Volume, Hospital vs. Non-Hospital Locations, 2004-2005 ................................1 Distribution of Sites by Total Mammography Procedures per Year, by Site Type, 2005..............................................2 Average Mammography Procedures per Site, by Site Type, 2005 ................................................................................2 Averagmocper Mammography Unit, by Site Type, 2005......................................................3 Mix of Screening vs. Diagnostic Procedures, All Sites, 2005...................3 Average Screening vs. Diagnostic Mammography Procedures per Site, by Site Type, 2005........................................3 Department Locations of Mammography Center Survey Respondents 4 Department Profile of Hospital-Based Mammography Locations, as of 2005 Study....................................................4 Service Scope of Non-Hospital Mammography Locations, as of 2005 Study...............................................................4 Ownership Type of Non-Hospital Mammography Locations, as of 2005 Study...........................................................4 Characteristics of the X-ray Mammography Installed Base 5 Total Surveyed Mammography Sites and Units, Hospitals vs. ...

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 39
Langue Slovak

Extrait

2005 Mammography Benchmark Table of Contents 1Mammography Procedure VolumeDistribution of Mammography Procedures and Sites in ~1,000 Sites Surveyed, by Site Type, 2005...........................1 Projected Mammography Procedure Volume, Hospital vs. Non-Hospital Locations, 2004-2005 ................................1 Distribution of Sites by Total Mammography Procedures per Year, by Site Type, 2005..............................................2 Average Mammography Procedures per Site, by Site Type, 2005 ................................................................................2 Average Mammography Procedures per Mammography Unit, by Site Type, 2005......................................................3 Mix of Screening vs. Diagnostic Procedures, All Sites, 2005 .......................................................................................3 Average Screening vs. Diagnostic Mammography Procedures per Site, by Site Type, 2005........................................3 4Department Locations of Mammography Center Survey Respondents Department Profile of Hospital-Based Mammography Locations, as of 2005 Study....................................................4 Service Scope of Non-Hospital Mammography Locations, as of 2005 Study...............................................................4 Ownership Type of Non-Hospital Mammography Locations, as of 2005 Study...........................................................4 Characteristics of the X-ray Mammography Installed Base5 Total Surveyed Mammography Sites and Units, Hospitals vs. Non-Hospitals, as of 2005 Study.................................5 Distribution of Sites by Number of Mammography Units Installed, by Site Type, as of 2005 Study...........................5 Distribution of X-ray Mammography Installed Base, by Year of Installation, Hospital and Non-Hospital Locations, as of 2005 Study.........................................................................................................................................................5 Whether Sites with Full-Field Digital Mammography Units Still Use Hard Copy Films, as of 2005 Study.................6 Purposes for Which Hard Copy Films are Being Made by Sites with Full-Field Digital Mammography Units,  asof 2005 Study.........................................................................................................................................................6 Variation of Procedures per Unit, by Number of Mammography Units Installed7 Mean Annual Procedure Volume per Mammo Unit, by Number of Units Installed per Site, 2005 ..............................7 Number of Mammography Units per Site vs. Annual Mammography Procedure Volume...........................................7 8Staffing Configurations Percent of Mammography Sites with Staff Types, by Site Type, as of 2005 Study ......................................................8 Mean FTE Staff per Mammography Site Having that Type, by Site Type, as of 2005 Study.......................................8 Women's Health Offerings at Mammography Centers9 Whether Mammography Center Currently Offers Specific Women's Health Services, as of 2005 Study ....................9 Productivity 10 Average Annual Mammography Procedures per FTE Technologist and Total FTE Staff, Hospital and  Non-HospitalLocations, 2005 .................................................................................................................................10 Total FTE Staff vs. Annual Mammography Procedure Volume .................................................................................10 Total FTE Technologists vs. Annual Mammography Procedure Volume...................................................................10 11Radiologists and Oncologists Associated with Breast Care Centers Percent of Mammography Sites with Radiologists Involved with Breast Imaging at This Location, by Site Type, as of2005Study...........................................................................................................................................................11Percent of Mammography Sites with Oncologists Involved with Breast Imaging at This Location, by Site Type, as of 2005 Study ...............................................................................................................................................................11 12Lead Time to Schedule a Screening Mammography Appointment Lead Time to Schedule a Screening Mammography Appointment, by Site Type, as of 2005 Study ..........................12 12Source of Service for Mammography Installed Base Source of Service for Mammography Installed Base, as of 2005 Study......................................................................12 13Data Collection and Methodology inside back coverAbout IMV Medical Information Division
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents