Prise en charge masso-kinésithérapique d’un lymphœdème et d’une raideur de l’épaule après traitement d’un cancer du sein - Brief INAHTA - Physiotherapeutic treatment of lymphoedema and shoulder stiffness after breast cancer treatment

Has

Description

Mis en ligne le 20 déc. 2012 Définir les indications, les non indications et les contre-indications de la prise en charge masso-kinésithérapique au cours d’une même séance d’un lymphœdème et d’une raideur de l’épaule, chez des femmes ayant été traitées pour un cancer du sein, décrire le contenu d’une séance (techniques employées, durée de chaque acte) et estimer le nombre et la fréquence des séances nécessaires Mis en ligne le 20 déc. 2012

Sujets

• Cancer du sein

Informations

• Publié par: haute-autorite-sante-maladies-sang-et-lymphe
• Publié le: 01 décembre 2012
• Nombre de lectures: 17
• Licence : En savoir +
  Paternité, pas d'utilisation commerciale, partage des conditions initiales à l'identique
• Langue: Français

Extrait

 

INAHTA brief   Title treatment of lymphoedema and shoulder stiffness after breast Physiotherapeutic cancer treatment   Agency HAS, French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de Santé)  2 avenue du Stade de France – F 93218 La Plaine Cedex, France  Tel: + 33 (0) 1 55 93 70 00 – Fax: + 33 (0) 1 55 93 74 35,  contact.seap@has-santé.fr,.haswwwetf.s-nar      , Reference N°ISBN : 978-2-11-128579-8   http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_1301437/fr/prise-en-charge-masso-kinesitherapique- dun-lymphoedeme-et-dune-raideur-de-lepaule-apres-traitement-dun-cancer-du-sein     Aim The objective of this evaluation, which was requested by the Caisse nationale d’assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS [National Health Insurance fund for salaried workers]), is to specify the indications, non-indications and contraindications relating to physiotherapeutic treatment, in the course of the same session, of upper limb lymphoedema and shoulder stiffness in women who have undergone treatment for breast cancer. The content of the sessions will also be determined (techniques used, durations of each procedure), as will their total duration and frequency.   Conclusions and results Combined physiotherapeutic treatment sessions involve, in succession, skin care, rehabilitation of the shoulder, manual lymph drainage (MLD), and bandaging. Therapeutic education of the patients is also an essential element of these sessions. Passive mobilisation of the scapulohumeral and scapulothoracic joints of the shoulder complex at levels below the pain threshold, without bandage, forms the basis of the rehabilitation of the shoulder. Many MLD techniques have been described and are practiced, but no standard manual lymph drainage technique has been identified. Combined sessions are indicated in the intensive phase of treatment (as opposed to the maintenance phase), provided that the following criteria are met: -  at at least one point on the affected limbdifference in circumference of more than 2 cm by comparison with the contralateral limb; -  asymmetry of shoulder passive range of motion, that has appeared or become more pronounced after treatment for breast cancer; - compliance with the entire treatment procedure associated with MLD (bandaging);   -  major functional repercussions (loss of autonomy) due to lymphoedema and shoulder stiffness. The non-indications and contraindications to combined sessions have also been defined. The duration of these sessions has been estimated at at least 1 h 15 minutes.  The optimal frequency of sessions combining MLD and rehabilitation of the shoulder is 10 sessions, 5 days out of 7, for 14 days in succession.  The programme of combined sessions normally only needs to be carried out once in each patient for each breast operated upon. 

2 Avenue du Stade de France – 93218 Saint-Denis La Plaine CEDEX, France Tel.: [phone] – Fax: [phone] –[e-mail] 

 

Methods The assessment method used is based on: · a critical analysis of the literature publish after a literature search of the Medlin

·  

ed between January 2002 and September 2012, e, Pascal, BDSP, Kinedoc, Cinahl and Pedro databases; 

the well-argued opinion of 10 experts in a working group;

· review of the report by a reading group of 23 experts. the   The report was examined by the Commission nationale d’évaluation des dispositifs médicaux et des technologi es de santé  [National Committee for the Assessment of (CNEDiMTS Medical Devices and Health Technologies]), then validated by the HAS Board.     Written by   Candice Legris, HAS, France        

2 Avenue du Stade de France – 93218 Saint-Denis La Plaine CEDEX, France Tel.: [phone] – Fax: [phone] –[e-mail]