Comment on 'Blocking method for RSA cryptosystem without expanding cipher length' - Electronics Letters

Ieee

Description

Consider the following scenario. Suppose N is quite close to References 2"-'. To be more specific suppose, say, that N satisfies 1 DIMARIA, D. J., and KERR, D. R.: 'Interface effects and high conduc- tivity in oxides grown from polycrystalline silicon', Appl. Phys. 2"-1 < N ~ 2"-1 + y-6 Lett., 1975, 21, pp. 505-507 2 ANDERSON, R. M., and KERR, D. R.: 'Evidence for surface asperity which, if N is chosen at random, would be expected to occur mechanism of conductivity in oxide grown on polycrystalline for every 1 in 32 such N. silicon', J. Appl. Phys., 1977, 48, pp. 48344836 CHEN, c. F., and wu, c. Y.: 'Superior characteristics of nitrided Then, given any C, there are two cases to consider: C < N 3 thermal oxide grown on polycrystalline silicon', Appl. Phys. Lett., and C 2 N; if M is random then these will occur roughly 1986,48, pp. 165167 equally often. If C < N then M 2 N with probability greater 4 ALVI, N. s., LEE, s. K., and KWONG, D. L.: 'Thin polyoxide films than 31/33. If C 2 N then we know with certainty that grown by rapid thermal processing', IEEE Electron Deu. Lett., M < N. Hence, as far as the most significant bit of M is 1987, EDL-8, (5) concerned, roughly half the time we know this bit is probably MAURY, A., KIM, s. c., MANOCHA, A., OH, K. H., KOSTELNICK, D., and 5 0, and the other half of the time we the bit is 1. SHIVE, s.: 'Application of rapid thermal oxidation to the develop- In other words, the most significant bit of M is sent ...

Informations

• Publié par: Imko
• Nombre de lectures: 12
• Langue: English

Extrait