Theory for light matter interaction in semiconductor quantum dots [Elektronische Ressource] / Christopher Gies

Christopher Gies

Sujets

• Physik

Informations

• Publié par: universitat_bremen
• Publié le: 01 janvier 2008
• Nombre de lectures: 17
• Langue: English
• Poids de l'ouvrage: 3 Mo

Extrait

Christopher Gies
Theory for
Light-Matter Interaction
in Semiconductor
Quantum Dots
A dissertation submitted
for the degree PhD at
the Universität Bremenersität
Prof.
nat.)
T
July
Ph
rank
for
Prof.
p
Univ
,
Institute
First
(Dr.
F
rer.
e,
submitted

with
Andreas
the

ermission
Berlin
April
the
Oral
PhD
,
for
examiner:
application
Dr.
ysics
Jahnk
dissertation
in
degree
of
of
and
Univ
Electrical
Bremen
Engineering,
examiner:
Univ
Dr.
ersit
Knorr,
y
ec
of
he
Bremen
ersität
Sup
Date
ervisor:
submission:
Prof.
21
Dr.
2008
F
Defense:
rank
17
Jahnk
2008
e
Aerimen
sp
In

longer
el

of
of
w
h
whic
mo
state-of-the-art
Sp
laser
tral
ted
radiativ
understanding
e
QDs
is
the
atoms.
full
laser
the
the
of
in
in
y
tum

h
o
placed
results
t
from
to
gain

ed
the
et
b
detailed
e
p
QDs
a
b
on-Neumann
rom


form
prop
v
are,
a
sense,

ell
for
ren
ed

is
with
and
taneous
ed,
to
emphasis
de.
the
the
(QDs).
applications,
hiev
pre
the
with
this
t
is
T
mo
deep

the

theory
emission
dierence
in
een

atoms,
et
with
dev
dels
een
namely
studied
equa
and
equation

the
F
for
y
y
the
functions

general
the
in
threshold
of
erties,
semi
h
theory
in
estigation

laser
no
ed
w
del
dened
time-resolv

QDs
t
quan


vit

lasers
dev
high
theory
on
op
emission
ecial
in
whic
the
dots
mo
is
T
is
underline


applied
to
ac
all
on
are
emen
sen
The
together
of
results
role

thesis.
exp
A
ts.
this
o

a
del
er
e
of
eects
deriv
and
laser
b
and
describ
the

b
dierences
w
a
and


elop
from
the
most
to

a
t

manner.
quan
Going
mo
b
is
ey
erformed,
ond
with
the
rate
rate
tions,
equation
master
limit,

w
and
e
Liouville/v

equation
the
the
rst-
densit
and
matrix.

Abstraould

our
ph
m
ec
family
the
tes,
y
ha
v
men
d
en
heaps
able

b
dy
y
When
as
eliev
d
uc
them
y
for
to
same
Sandra
o
it
lots
b
as
orking
My
exp
the
who
that
in
reads
Cuba,
Manfred
y
the
to
PhD
e
y
y
suered
y
y
e
three
and
w
p
exp
end
grateful
erio
team:
Stefan
with
at
Lork
ona
and
en
rithjof

m
some
pleasure
Stacey
me
ys
together
ts
b
tal
for
er.
indebted
p
p
to

not
and
bit
a
Berstermann
relaxed
y
h

are

sup
and
will
I
ery
that
go
and
ork
e
oss...
o
A
under
ha
Nev
ould
the
happily
time
Lin
a
who
esp
made
a

lik
to
rst
time
w
graduation
the
in
Jan
Norman
aul
go
he
div

ork
I
ork,
Jan
man
Jahnk
ening
and
Christian
most
lots
It
for
ossible
fun
m
orkshop
time
ell
b
m
it
alw
w
eing
All
kno

to
go
for
est
design
to

y
I
wledgements
e
new
t
plmcn
am
osition
eryb
een
do
Magdeburg,
here
in
bit
sta
A
has
Thorsten
as
and
whic
Ba
as
er.
pleasure
it
ou
to
w
sub
and
of
to
ysics
ou
the
v
thesis,
b
b
w
e
a
m
enjo
friends
o
family
ervised
v
b
not
able.
to
Man
m
with.
h

m
t
profession.
v
ertheless,
w
made
lik
same
to
past
thank
am
here:
and
us
I
Jana,
half
ha
y
e
ears
it
ould
ossible

more
ecially
us
erience,
sp
e
some
to
of
rank
y
tion
p
thank
d
Bremen-based
the
that
place,
P
and
Wiersig,
for
Gartner,
o
ork
part-time
Ritter,
ersion
whom
w
hael
and
made
w
e,
Iv
sp
for
Seeb
y
am
ev
k
ev
t
ts,
F
for
p
and
Anders.
of
of
Maren
has
a
who
of
een
and
y
w
y
time,
for
w
to
as
w
and
e
y
e,
for
to
a
together.
b
ork
there.
to
ac
with
wledgemen
the
also
in
Martin
has
h
erimen
the
of

I
F
m
I
the
e
I
establishmen
thesis
ts,
v
of
Finally
whom
w
I
lik
w
to
ould
oin
lik
out
e
I
to
grateful
men
ev
tion
o
Sv
who
en
es

stop
h,
but
Thomas
a
Auer,
a
Serk
further.
an
A.
the
.
.
.
.
Ja
.
.
.
tum-Dot
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Lasers
.
.
.
.
.
.
w
Lasers
ts
25
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4
Undop
.
and
e
in
.
.
.
.
.
Cluster
.
.
.
2
.
Laser
.
83
Considerations
.
.
4
48
.
.
4
.
.
.
.
53
5
.
.
.
5
.
.
.
.
.
System
of
.
.
.
.
121
Coupling
tin
ed

.
.
.
.
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
First-Order
.
y
.
Order
Stationary
.
tum
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
Comparison
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Conclusion
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
Rate
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The
16
.
.
.
29
.
64
.
.
for
erimen
102
of
.
ed
.
.
.
QDs
.
.
118
33
.

and
.
a
.
in
of

.
.
.
.
.
.
35
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
74
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Metho
.
.
.
.
4
.
in
.

.
83
4
.
3
.
.
.
for
.
Sp
.
in
.
.
45
.
.
.
.
of
.
Quan
out
.
.
.
vit
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
.
Exp
.
.
.
.
.
.
Laser
.
7
.
.
.
.
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
ed
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
89
.
with
.
dels
.
1
Results
Limit
Ligh
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
.
Equation
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
96
.
.
.
Mo
with
Single
ed
.
.
5
.
Conclusion
Dop
.
Motion
.
and
.
System
.
ed
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
2
5
.
Pulsed
7
Con
.
uous-W
Time-Resolv
v
.


A
.
and
QDs
QD
Hamil