The Faculty of Northern California Graduate University
In Partial Fulfillment
Of The Requirements For The Degree
Doctor Of Philosophy In Higher Education
by
Charles Russell Natson
San Mateo, 1998
The Dissertation of Charles Russell Natson
is approved and is accepted in quality and form:
Northern California Graduate University
San Mateo, 1998
ii
Abstract of the Dissertation TUTOR EVALUATION BY SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR CHABOT COLLEGE TUTORIAL INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM
by Charles Russell Natson
Doctor of Philosophy in Higher Education Northern California Graduate University San Mateo, CA. 1998
Society’s evolving perception of the role of and value of higher education relates to education’s role in employment. Employment is the most cited reason for school completion. The creation of peer tutoring programs was to improve the academic performance of underprepared students. This study evaluated tutors registered in the Tutorial Training Course T-15 at Chabot College, Hayward, California. The Tutor Evaluation and Self-Assessment Tool (TESAT) was utilized to measure the tutors’ performance. Thirty tutors performed the pre- and post-assessments. The instructor also evaluated the tutors with the TESAT, after the tutors’ post-assessments to investigate the relationship between the tutors’ and their instructor’s perception of their tutorial skill.
iii
The tutors rated themselves as being proficient. There was a moderate
correlation between the tutors’ and the instructor’s assessments. Attempts are
currently being made to certify Chabot College’s Tutorial Instructional Program
with the College Reading and Learning Association. This certification in the field
of tutorial education will assist the enhancement of the tutoring profession.
iv
Acknowledgments
The following acknowledgments are to state for the record that any problems with this work are the sole responsibility of this author, and not the responsibility of the following family and friends that have worked so hard to see this work come to fruition.
First and foremost I would like to thank my ancestors, for without their blessing this effort could not go forward. I give special thanks and love to my wife, Harveyette, for her patience, understanding and love for over thirty-one years, particularly the last five years. I also give thanks to my son, N’Gai, for never failing to make me laugh when the going got tough; to my daughter, Anika, who believed that her Dad could do no wrong and gave encouragement when I was struggling; and to Elza Minor, my friend for over forty years, who suggested to me that it was time to get my first graduate degree.
To Dr. Joe Canton, Dr. Sylvia Shue, and Dr. Sarah Lovett (Chair of the Doctoral Advisory Committee).
Dr. Canton guided me through the maze of Doctoral land mines and I will be forever thankful. Dr. Sylvia Shue, main cheerleader, counselor, research advisor, spiritual gatekeeper, and overall great person. The following people have also given of themselves freely and enthusiastically: Dr. J. E. (Penny) Saffold, Dr. Phillip McGee, Dr. David Shipp, and Dr. Ruth Self.
And lastly to my many friends and family members, too numerous to mention, who supported me in my struggles, I am in your debt. Please know that I thank you all for your kindness and support.
v
Dedication
In memory of my Mother, Lillian Ford Natson Maury.
Mother was the most inspirational figure in my life. During my early childhood years, she instilled in me the notion that I would be an educator and would be in the service of serving young people. It was her vision of me that helped shape my ideas of what education should be, to take a student where he or she might be and proceed to teach from that perspective. I give thanks to the Creator and my Mother.
vi
.
vii
Doctoral Dissertation Charles Russell Natson Northern California Graduate University
TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURESHEET...................................................................................................ii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................................................................................v DEDICATION..............................................................................................................vi
Chapter I.INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 Background of Need for Peer Tutors ..................................................................... 1 Statement of the Problem and Purpose of the Study .............................................. 2 JustificationandImplications................................................................................4 ResearchQuestions................................................................................................6 Definition of Terms and Operational Definitions .................................................. 7 Limitations of Study ............................................................................................... 8 IILITERATUREREVIEW.......................................................................................9 Call for Higher Educational Standards .................................................................. 9 Changes in Academic Developmental Education .................................................. 11 Interactive Learning ............................................................................................... 16 A New Model at City University of New York ..................................................... 17 A Recent History of Peer Tutoring ........................................................................ 19 PeerTutoringforAdultLiteracy............................................................................20 Use of Small Groups in Adult Literacy .................................................................. 22 Adult Literacy and Limited English Proficiency .................................................... 23 III.METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................26 Research Design and Sample Population ............................................................... 26 Instrumentation ...................................................................................................... 27 Data Collection . ..................................................................................................... 30 Data Analysis ......................................................................................................... 32
viii
IV. FINDINGS ............................................................................................................. 37
Overview of Findings of the Study ........................................................................ 37 Descriptive Statistics on Each TESAT Item .......................................................... 37 Descriptive Statistics for Clustered Strategies . ...................................................... 66 Descriptive Statistics and Correlation for Overall TESAT .................................... 68
V. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................ 71
Introduction ............................................................................................................ 71 Item11c..................................................................................................................73 Conclusions and Recommendations ...................................................................... 73