With the adoption of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement, the purpose of development is being redefined in both social and environmental terms. Despite pushback from conservative forces, change is accelerating in many sectors. To drive this transformation in ways that bring about social, environmental and economic justice at a local, national, regional and global levels, new knowledge and strong cross-regional networks capable of foregrounding different realities, needs and agendas will be essential. In fact, the power of knowledge matters today in ways that humanity has probably never experienced before, placing an emphasis on the roles of research, academics and universities.In this collection, an international diverse collection of scholars from the southern African and Nordic regions critically review the SDGs in relation to their own areas of expertise, while placing the process of knowledge production in the spotlight. In Part I, the contributors provide a sober assessment of the obstacles that neo-liberal hegemony presents to substantive transformation. In Part Two, lessons learned from North–South research collaborations and academic exchanges are assessed in terms of their potential to offer real alternatives. In Part III, a set of case studies supply clear and nuanced analyses of the scale of the challenges faced in ensuring that no one is left behind.This accessible and absorbing collection will be of interest to anyone interested in North–South research networks and in the contemporary debates on the role of knowledge production.The Southern African–Nordic Centre (SANORD) is a network of higher education institutions that stretches across Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Botswana, Namibia, Malawi, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Universities in the southern African and Nordic regions that are not yet members are encouraged to join.
Critical perspectives from southern AfricanNordic research partnerships
K now edge o r j ustîce
Critical perspectives from southern AfricanNordic research partnerships
Edited by Tor Halvorsen, Hilde Ibsen, HenriCount Evans and Sharon Penderis
AFRICAN MINDS
Publîshed în 0 by Afrîcan Mînds Eccleston Place, Somerset West, 0, Cape Town, South Afrîca înfo@afrîcanmînds.org.za www.afrîcanmînds.org.za and The Southern Afrîcan-Nordîc Centre Unîversîty of the Western Cape, Prîvate Bag X, Bellvîlle, Tel: + 0 http://sanord.net 0
All contents of thîs document, unless specîied otherwîse, are lîcensed under a Creatîve Commons Attrîbutîon .0 Internatîonal Lîcense.
The vîews expressed în thîs publîcatîon are those of the authors. When quotîng from any of the chapters, readers are requested to acknowledge the relevant author. ISBNs ---- Prînt ---- e-Book ----0 e-Pub
Copîes of thîs book are avaîlable for free download at www.afrîcanmînds.org.za and http://sanord.net ORDERS For orders from Afrîca, please contact: Afrîcan Mînds Emaîl: înfo@afrîcanmînds.org.za For orders from outsîde Afrîca, please contact: Afrîcan Books Collectîve PO Box , Oxford OX EN, UK Emaîl: orders@afrîcanbookscollectîve.com
Côéŝ
Acronyms and abbrevîatîons ïntroductîon Tor Halvorsen, Hilde Ibsen, Henri-Count Evans and Saron Penderis
Pà I:KNOWLEDGE AND NEO-LIBERALISM 1 he Sustaînabe Deveopment Goas, knowedge productîon and te goba strugge over vaues Tor Halvorsen 2he Sustaînabe Deveopment Goas, te Parîs Agreement and te Addîs Agenda: Neo-îberaîsm, unequa deveopment and te rîse o a new împerîaîsm Henri-Count Evans and Rosemary Musvipwa 3 Academîc reedom and îts enemîes: Lessons rom Sweden Jens Stilof Sörensen and Erik J Olsson 4 New pubîc management as a mecanîsm o accumuatîon by dîspossessîon: he case o a pubîc buk water provîder în Sout Arîca Carina van Rooyen 5 To It or not to It, îs tat te questîon? Goba goas, basîc educatîon and teorîes o knowedge în Sout Arîca and Sweden Hilde Ibsen, Saron Penderis and Karin Bengtsson 6 Academîa în te context o constraînt and a perormatîve SDG agenda: A perspectîve on Sout Arîca Suriamurtee Maistry and Erlend Eidsvik
Pà II:NORT–SOUT COLLABORATION 7 Contrîbutîng to te agenda or sustaînabe deveopment troug Nort–Sout educatîona partnersîps: An anaysîs o two Lînnaeus-Pame staf–student excanges between Sweden and Sout Arîca Kate Rowntree and Roddy Fox
vii 1
13
37
57
71
93
115
131
8Preparîng to buîd researcers’ capacîty în deveopment and communîty mobîîsatîon: Towards sustaînabe Nort–Sout coaboratîons hembinkosi E Mabila and Racel J Sing 9 Nort–Sout researc coaboratîon and te Sustaînabe Deveopment Goas: Caenges and opportunîtîes or academîcs Stepen Mago 10 Educatîon or empoyabîîty: A response to îndustry demands Robert L Martin, Regina Krause, Marta T Namutuwa, Evgenia Maler and Hartmut Domröse
147
163
175
Pà III:CASE STUDIES 11 Contextua actors afectîng te attaînment o îe satîsactîon among edery peope în Zambîa’s Nort-Western provînce189 Mubiana K Sitali-Ngoma and Emmy H Mbozi 12Home–scoo reatîons and te roe o îndîgenous knowedge în eary îteracy earnîng: A case study rom a rura scoo în Zambîa207 Anne Marit Vesteraas Danbolt, Dennis Banda, Jørgen Klein and Geofrey Tambulukani 13Reocatîon o te omestead: A customary practîce în te communa areas o nort-centra Namîbîa227 Antti Erkkilä and Nelago Indongo
About te contrîbutors
239
Féquély uŝé àcôymŝ à àévîàîôŝ
CDM Cean Deveopment Mecanîsm CEO cîe executîve oicer DFïD Department or ïnternatîona Deveopment ECTS European Credît Transer System FDï oreîgn dîrect învestment GCïs green campus înîtîatîves GïS geograpîc înormatîon systems ïAU ïnternatîona Assocîatîon o Unîversîtîes ïCT înormatîon and communîcatîons tecnoogy ïPPE ïnternatîona Programme în Poîtîcs and Economîcs ïTMOs înternatîonay transerred mîtîgatîon outcomes ïWRM întegrated water resource management LEMS Lîteracy Educatîon în Mutîîngua Settîngs MDGs Mîennîum Deveopment Goas MSRDT Mutîdîscîpînary student and researc deveopment teams NOQA Nordîc Quaîty Assurance Network în Hîger Educatîon NPM new pubîc management NRF Natîona Researc Foundatîon OECD Organîsatîon or Economîc Co-operatîon and Deveopment PïSA Programme or ïnternatîona Student Assessment PPPs pubîc–prîvate partnersîps PRP Prîmary Readîng Programme PUPs pubîc–pubîc partnersîps SANORD Soutern Arîcan–Nordîc Centre SAQMEC Soutern and Eastern Arîca Consortîum or Monîtorîng Educatîona Quaîty SDGs Sustaînabe Deveopment Goas SDSN Sustaînabe Deveopment Soutîons Network SWOT strengts, weaknesses, opportunîtîes and treats UNDP Unîted Natîons Deveopment Programme UNFCCC Unîted Natîons Framework Conventîon on Cîmate Cange UNRïSD Unîted Natîons Researc ïnstîtute or Socîa Deveopment VoB Voîce o Busîness WïL work întegrated earnîng WHO Word Heat Organîzatîon WTO Word Trade Organîzatîon
vîî
Iôucîô Tor Halvorsen, Hilde Ibsen, Henri-Count Evansand Saron Penderis
THis is tHe tHird book in a seriestat as evoved out o conerences osted by te Soutern-Arîca-Nordîc Centre (SANORD), were researcers rom te soutern Arîcan and te Nordîc countrîes ave met to dîscuss aspects o knowedge productîon reevant to sustaînabîîty. hîs 2017 voume aso marks SANORD’s tent annîversary as a network tat candîdy and crîtîcay engages wît te îdeoogîes and knowedge systems tat span te two regîons and wîtîn te dîferent member înstîtutîons. Sînce te eary 2000s, înternatîona academîc networks ave grown penomenay and are încreasîngy acknowedged to be a crîtîca part o te work done în unîversîtîes and researc înstîtutîons. From îts începtîon, SANORD ad a ead start, în te sense tat many o îts oundîng înstîtutîons ad aready orged cose reatîonsîps over prevîous decades troug numerous cross-regîona înkages and coaboratîve projects. O course, te soutern Arîcan and Nordîc countrîes ave oowed very dîferent trajectorîes reated to modernîsatîon and deveopment, but as reatîonsîps between te two regîons ave evoved, te sîmîarîtîes between tem ave come to te ore. Framed by our posîtîons în te goba economy, and wîtîn te înternatîona geopoîtîca baance o power, we ave numerous common înterests as ‘sma-states’. ïn a word domînated by arge economîc bocs suc as te OECD, OPEC and BRïCS, our two regîons represent a dîferent set o înterests and can tereore artîcuate a range o aternatîve îdeas about ow a sustaînabe word can and soud be deveoped. Certaîny, we ave a ong way to go beore academîcs rom îger educatîon înstîtutîons în soutern Arîca and te Nordîc countrîes are abe to consîstenty work cosey togeter on ong-term projects and beneIt rom te co-created knowedge tat comparatîve researc supports. Neverteess, SANORD brîdges cutura barrîers and trîes to promote and acîîtate înterdîscîpînary work. Ten years în, progress îs beîng made. Sînce 2007, SANORD’s dîferent nodes ave enabed scoars to earn rom one anoter about wo we are and ow we can do better în terms o knowedge
1
2
co-creatîon. As coaboratîve researc drîves academîc co-operatîon down new patways, uture pubîcatîons wî no doubt provîde încreasîngy useu teoretîca and empîrîca studîes o te sîmîarîtîes and dîferences between our regîons, tus oferîng new and împortant perspectîves on ow we mîgt cose up te Nort–Sout dîvîde. he contrîbutors to tîs tîrd book în te serîes take tîs process orward. Crîtîca perspectîves on te Unîted Natîons’ Sustaînabe Deveopment Goas (SDGs) (UN 2015b) ave guîded te coectîon, and a te contrîbutors ave brougt teîr knowedge and competence to bear to crîtîcay revîew te întentîons o te SDGs în reatîon to teîr own areas o expertîse. One o te undamenta îdeas underpînnîng te SDGs, atoug arguaby te east deveoped, îs tat no country soud aîm to împement tem în ways tat prevent oter countrîes rom doîng so too. A crucîa step, ten, îs to overcome te knowedge ceavages between Nort and Sout, tat ave been created over many years by structura înequaîtîes and poor eadersîp. he contrîbutors sow ow cross-regîona researc networks can contrîbute to sîtîng te condîtîons tat create unequa deveopment and, în amost every capter, suggest aternatîves to te one-sîze-Its a soutîons tat render te twenty-Irst century’s domînant neo-îbera paradîgm so îmîted and so dangerous. As a network o academîc înstîtutîons, SANORD as an împortant roe to pay în meetîng te caenges o academîc reedom and te decoonîsatîon o knowedge. ït îs pertînent to raîse awareness about knowedge îndependent rom poîtîcs and economîc înterests, and create a cîmate or te SDGs to be dîscussed openy, crîtîcay and creatîvey.
Upàcîg é SDGŝ ïn 2015, eads o state and government representatîves rom around te word adopted te 17 SDGs and te assocîated 169 targets wît te aîm o eradîcatîng extreme poverty, reducîng înequaîtîes, buîdîng a just and more equa socîety and acîevîng economîc deveopment, socîa încusîon and envîronmenta sustaînabîîty. he SDGs are based on te prîncîpe o ‘eavîng no one beînd’. Turnîng prîncîpe înto practîce îs te rea caenge. he SDGs’ca or transormatîon presents opportunîtîes and caenges or te academîc word generay and îger educatîon înstîtutîons în partîcuar. Questîons tat urgenty requîre answers învove ow our înstîtutîons and networks wî contrîbute to te coectîve journey set out în te SDGs, wîe aso reairmîng te vîsîon o unîty set out în te preambe to te Unîted Natîons’ oundîng carter back în 1945. ïn terms o te SDGs, îger educatîon înstîtutîons ave been gîven responsîbîîty or deveopîng modes or goba justîce and or mobîîsîng a
KNOWLEDGE FOR JUSTICE
crîtîca mass o academîc support (see UN 2015b). For rea cange to occur, owever, actîon must take pace at te goba, natîona, regîona and oca eves, and across borders, regîons and contînents. he success o te SDGs undoubtedy requîres a deeper understandîng o te probems acîng te word and o te kînds o skîs and abîîtîes tat wî enabe governments, te prîvate sector, academîa and cîvî socîety to coaborate în addressîng tese. Taken togeter, te 17 SDGs partîcuary ca înto questîon te so-caed deveopment mode propagated by te Nort or so ong, most recenty în te guîse o neo-îbera reorms. But wî we reay see goba deveopment înîtîatîves takîng te îssues o cîmate cange adaptatîon and mîtîgatîon serîousy and reducîng bot înequaîty and carbon emîssîons în ways tat actuay eave no one beînd?
Iéàlîŝm wî làgé? ïmportanty, te process o determînîng te SDGs was more încusîve and coaboratîve tan te ormuatîon o te Mîennîum Deveopment Goas (MDGs), în tat ît încuded not ony te word’s weaty natîons, but aso mîdde-încome and ow-încome countrîes (Abe et a. 2016; Sacs 2012). ïn împementîng te SDGs, te Unîted Natîons envîsages a partîcîpatory process between mutîeve stakeoders and te osterîng o goba partnersîps between governments, te prîvate sector, NGOs, aîd organîsatîons and oca communîtîes (Prescott and Stîbbe 2016). ïn tîs regard, te Unîted Natîons Genera Assemby Resoutîon tat was adopted în September 2015 on te SDGs states:
We are determîned to mobîîze te means requîred to împement tîs Agenda troug a revîtaîzed Goba Partnersîp or Sustaînabe Deveopment, based on a spîrît o strengtened goba soîdarîty ocused on te needs o te poorest and most vunerabe and wît te partîcîpatîon o a countrîes, a stakeoders and a peope. (UN 2015: Preambe)
Unîke te MDGs, te SDGs relect te Unîted Natîons’ attempt to ofer a more întegrated approac to sustaînabe deveopment, brîngîng togeter te economîc, socîa and envîronmenta dîmensîons (Sterîng 2016). ïn decîdîng on a new goba agenda, te Unîted Natîons’ argument îs tat progress made towards acîevîng te Mîennîum Deveopment Goas proved tat umanîty can work togeter to acîeve common goas. Atoug many ad seen te MDGs as too îdeaîstîc and unreaîstîc, sîgnîIcant progress was made towards uIîng tem. he consensus, tereore, was tat ‘wen muc îs dared, muc can be acîeved’. ïn addîtîon, te wîder appîcabîîty o te SDGs was seen as sîgnaîng a new era or goba poîtîcs and deveopment.