Recently, the salient idea of personhood in the tradition of African philosophy has been objected to on various grounds. Two such objections stand out � the book deals with a lot more. The first criticism is that the idea of personhood is patriarchal insofar as it elevates the status of men and marginalises women in society. The second criticism observes that the idea of personhood is characterised by speciesism. The essence of these concerns is that personhood fails to embody a robust moral-political view. African Personhood and Applied Ethics offers a philosophical explication of the ethics of personhood to give reasons why we should take it seriously as an African moral perspective that can contribute to global moral-political issues. The book points to the two facets that constitute the ethics of personhood � an account of (1) moral perfection and (2) dignity. It then draws on the under-explored view of dignity qua the capacity for sympathy inherent in the moral idea of personhood to offer a unified account of selected themes in applied ethics, specifically women, animal and development.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,0062€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
Dedication I dedicate this book to these future stars — Motsamai, Tumelo, Molefe, Thato, Makgotso.
About te Series he Arîcan Humanîtîes Serîes îs a partnersîp between te Arîcan Humanîtîes Program (AHP) o te Amerîcan Councî o Learned Socîetîes and academîc pubîsers NïSC (Pty) Ltd. he Serîes covers topîcs în Arîcan îstorîes, anguages, îteratures, pîosopîes, poîtîcs and cutures. Submîssîons are soîcîted rom Feows o te AHP, wîc îs admînîstered by te Amerîcan Councî o Learned Socîetîes and Inancîay supported by te Carnegîe Corporatîon o New York. he purpose o te AHP îs to encourage and enabe te productîon o new knowedge by Arîcans în te Ive countrîes desîgnated by te Carnegîe Corporatîon: Gana, Nîgerîa, Sout Arîca, Tanzanîa, and Uganda. AHP eowsîps support one year’s work ree rom teacîng and oter responsîbîîtîes to aow te Feow to compete te project proposed. Eîgîbîîty or te eowsîp în te Ive countrîes îs by domîcîe, not natîonaîty. Book proposas are submîtted to te AHP edîtorîa board wîc manages te peer revîew process and seects manuscrîpts or pubîcatîon by NïSC. ïn some cases, te AHP board wî commîssîon a manuscrîpt mentor to undertake substantîve edîtîng and to work wît te autor on reInîng te Ina manuscrîpt. he Arîcan Humanîtîes Serîes aîms to pubîs works o te îgest quaîty tat wî oreground te best researc beîng done by emergîng scoars în te Ive Carnegîe desîgnated countrîes. he rîgorous seectîon process beore te eowsîp award, as we as AHP edîtorîa vettîng o manuscrîpts, assures attentîon to quaîty. Books în te serîes are întended to speak to scoars în Arîca as we as în oter areas o te word. he AHP îs aso commîtted to provîdîng a copy o eac pubîcatîon în te serîes to unîversîty îbrarîes în Arîca.
AHP Editorial Board Members as at January 2020
AHP Series Editors: Proessor Adîgun Agbaje, Unîversîty o ïbadan, Nîgerîa Proessor Emerîtus Fred Hendrîcks, Rodes Unîversîty, Sout Arîca
Consultant: Proessor Emerîtus Sandra Barnes, Unîversîty o Pennsyvanîa, USA (Antropoogy)
Domînîca Dîpîo,Gender terrains in Arican cinema, 2014 Ayo Adeduntan,Wat te orest tod me: Yoruba unter, cuture and narrative perormance,2014 Sue E. Egya,Nation, power and dissidence in tird-generation Nigerian poetry in Engis, 2014 ïrîkîdzayî Manase,Wite narratives: He depiction o post-2000 and invasions in Zimbabwe, 2016 Pasca Mungwînî,Indigenous Sona piosopy: Reconstructive insigts, 2017 Syvîa Bruînders,Parading respectabiity: He cutura and mora aestetics o te Cristmas Bands Movement in te Western Cape, Sout Arica, 2017 Mîcae Andîndîîe,He Angopone iterary-inguistic continuum: Engis and indigenous anguages in Arican iterary discourse, 2018 Jeremîa Arowosegbe,Caude E Ake: te making o an organic inteectua, 2018 Romanus Abo,Language and te construction o mutipe identities in te Nigerian nove, 2018 Bernard Matoîno,Consensus as democracy in Arica, 2018 Babajîde Ooajuo,Unsared Identity: Postumous paternity in a contemporary Yoruba community, 2018 De-Vaera NYM Botcway,Boxing is no cakewak! Azuma ‘Ring Proessor’ Neson in te socia istory o Ganaian boxing,2019 Dîna Lîgaga,Women, visibiity and moraity in Kenyan popuar media,2020. Okaka Opîo Dokotum,and Arica: Recycing te ‘Dark Continent’ oywood myt,1908–2020,2020
AFRICAN PERSONHOOD AND APPLIED ETHICS
MOTSAMAI MOLEFE
Pubîsed în Sout Arîca on bea o te Arîcan Humanîtîes Program by NïSC (Pty) Ltd, PO Box 377, Makanda, 6140, Sout Arîca www.nîsc.co.za
A rîgts reserved. No part o tîs pubîcatîon may be reproduced or transmîtted în any orm or by any means, eectronîc or mecanîca, încudîng potocopyîng, recordîng, or any înormatîon storage or retrîeva system, wîtout prîor permîssîon în wrîtîng rom te pubîser.
he autor and te pubîser ave made every efort to obtaîn permîssîon or and acknowedge te use o copyrîgt materîa. Soud an înadvertent înrîngement o copyrîgt ave occurred, pease contact te pubîser and we wî rectîy omîssîons or errors în any subsequent reprînt or edîtîon.
Acknowledgements Preface
INTRODUCTION
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
CHAPTER1 Personood as a moral teory
CHAPTER2 Personood and dignity in African moral-political tougt
CHAPTER3 Personood and te equality of women in African pilosopy
CHAPTER4 he place of animals in African moral pilosopy
CHAPTER5 Personood and development in African pilosopy
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
INDEX
viii ix
1
17
35
54
75
92
114
117
133
vii
viii
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
he success o tîs work was made possîbe because o te assîstance and support o a arge number o peope and organîsatîons to wom ï am eternay grateu. Space does not permît me to express my gratîtude to a o tem, but ï am cognîsant o and acknowedge eac one. he manuscrîpt or tîs pubîcatîon was prepared wît te support o te Arîcan Humanîtîes Feowsîp Program estabîsed by te Amerîcan Councî o Learned Socîetîes (ACLS) wît a generous grant rom te Carnegîe Corporatîon o New York. My sîncere tanks go to te Arîcan Humanîtîes Program (AHP) Serîes Edîtors, Pro. Emerîtus Fred Hendrîcks, Rodes Unîversîty, Sout Arîca and Pro. Adîgun Agbaje, Unîversîty o ïbadan, Nîgerîa or teîr support and to Barbara van der Merwe o te AHP Secretarîat or er proessîonaîsm, patîence, and encouragîng motîvatîon. hanks are aso due to te two anonymous revîewers o te manuscrîpt. heîr comments, crîtîcîsms and însîgts were înstructîve and epu. My gratîtude aso goes to te Govan Mbekî Centre and Deveopment Centre at te Unîversîty o Fort Hare wîc provîded generous Inancîa support tat contrîbuted to makîng pubîcatîon o tîs book possîbe. Pro. Puma Gqoa deserves a specîa mentîon or er eadersîp and or supportîng my researc în Arîcan pîosopy. My sîncere tanks to haddeus Metz, Bernard Matoîno, and Seperd Mpou, or a te support, mentorîng and conversatîons about my career and our work as academîcs. ï wî aways apprecîate teîr înluence and support. My gratîtude woud be încompete wîtout my eartet tanks to my partner and rîend Asîtandîe Zîbaya or a te support and ove în my journey as a scoar and wrîter. hank you or beîevîng în me and beîng my number one supporter. ï acknowedge and apprecîate Jon ïrvîne or edîtîng te manuscrîpt. ï am aso grateu or a te admînîstratîve, Inancîa and coegîa support ï receîved rom my coeagues — Crîs Asobrook and Sakatîna Mnonopî, at te Centre o Leadersîp Etîcs în Arîca (CLEA) at Fort Hare. ït îs truy a bessîng to work wît you coeagues. ï am grateu to te Department o Pîosopy at Fort Hare or organîsîng a wrîtîng retreat were ï worked on te revîsîons o te book.
ï tank you a!
P
r
e
f
a
c
e
ï was motîvated to wrîte tîs book by te sweîng crîtîcîsms agaînst te îdea o personood în te îterature. Scoars o Arîcan mora tougt, îke Antony Oyowe, Mpo Tsîvase, and Kaî Horstemke, among oters, ave raîsed wat tey regard as devastatîng objectîons agaînst te mora îdea o personood. he trust o tese objectîons îs tat te îdea o personood îs împausîbe, and we soud expore oter îndîgenous axîoogîca resources to artîcuate a sound mora-poîtîca system. hree o tese crîtîcîsms o personood stood out or me. he Irst crîtîcîsm îs tat ît aîs to embody a just socîa order, were bot men and women are equa and are owed equa mora dutîes. he suggestîon înerent în tîs crîtîcîsm îs tat te îdea o personood îs întrînsîcay patrîarca and îmagînes and reproduces gender-based socîa înequaîtîes tat advantage and prîorîtîse men at te expense o women. he second crîtîcîsm ocuses on te questîon o anîmas, antropocentrîsm and specîesîsm. he poînt o tîs crîtîcîsm îs tat te îdea o personood cannot embody a sound anîma etîcs sînce ît îs essentîay speceîstîc. he tîrd crîtîcîsm suggests tat te îdea o personood aîs to embody te eature o socîa egaîtarîanîsm sînce ît îs a perormance-based etîca system. Wat a tese crîtîcîsms ave în common îs tat tey suggest tat te îdea o personood aîs to ofer a pausîbe account o a just socîa order. ï beîeve tat tese crîtîcîsms underestîmate te teoretîca rîcness o te îdea o personood. he purpose o tîs book îs to expose te robustness o te mora vîew înerent în te dîscourse o personood. To do tîs, te book begîns by pîosopîcay expîcatîng te under-expored dua eatures o personood, namey mora perectîonîsm and dîgnîty, wîc unods te major însîgt o te book. he îterature as been Ixated on te mora perectîonîst acet o personood, tendîng to overook îts dîgnîty acet. ï address tîs îmbaance by artîcuatîng a pausîbe teory o dîgnîty înerent în te îdea o personood. ïn so doîng, ï sow tat te crîtîcîsms agaînst te îdea o personood are mîsguîded and mîsIre because tey overook te dîgnîty acet o personood, wîc ï beîeve îs suicîent cause to caenge te objectîons raîsed by scoars o Arîcan mora tougt.To revea te robustness o te îdea o personood and to ofer reasons tat expaîn wy we soud take ît serîousy, ï expore tree dîsparate appîed etîcs temes — women, anîmas and deveopment. ïn my vîew, two outcomes woud vîndîcate te exîstence o tîs book. he Irst îs î ît manages to artîcuate a robust etîcs o personood tat îs caracterîsed by te dua eatures o mora perectîonîsm and dîgnîty, and satîsactorîy motîvates