Le classement des entreprises

Afzal Mohammad

Informations

• Publié par: guillaumelaunay
• Publié le: 15 septembre 2015
• Nombre de lectures: 13 969
• Langue: Français

Extrait

Johnson & Johnson

Vinci

18

11

Telefonica

20

Vodafone Group

Corporations and Influencers

InfluenceMap Scoring Tables:

Information Technology North America

Sector

18

49

Information Technology North America

21

Engagement Intensity

Orange

C

B-

C+

C

C

B-

B-

B

B-

Cisco Systems

ABB

Europe

Europe

Europe

Telecommunications

Telecommunications

North America

Europe

Europe

Region

Information Technology North America

Commercial Services

11

30

21

16

34

13

InfluenceMap Performance Band

Unilever

Google

1

Organization

Healthcare

Healthcare

Industrials

Utilities

25

19

Telecommunications

Here are our ranking tables ofcorporations and influencers (trade associations etc.) on their influence on climate change policy. Progressive organizations supporting climate policy are at the top of the table with obstructive ones at the bottom in the F band. The names of the companies and influencers are hyperlinked back to our site. The full interactive version is availablehere th 14 September 2015 Corporations

C+

C+

B

B

Consumer Staples

Apple

Nestle

Consumer Staples

Europe

Europe

Telecommunications

National Grid

Deutsche Telekom

GlaxoSmithKline

C+

Europe

Europe

Europe

North America

North America

Information Technology

Automotive

Healthcare

Express Scripts Holding

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone

InfluenceMap Performance Band

PepsiCo

Walt Disney

Europe

North America

Europe

Iberdrola

Anheuser Busch InBev

Utilities

Honda Motor

Coca Cola

Organization

Consumer Staples

4

12

9

14

Engagement Intensity

18

17

20

C-

C-

C-

15

6

42

14

18

C

C

C

Amgen

21

7

C-

C-

C-

C-

C-

C-

C-

C

Novartis

Walmart Stores

C-

D+

C-

C-

C-

Europe

L'Oreal

C

C

C

Consumer Staples

Information Technology Asia

Asia

Asia

Samsung Electronics

Telecommunications

Deutsche Post

Microsoft

Siemens

8

Industrials

5

9

17

United Technologies

14

7

56

8

4

10

Mondelez International

Softbank

Qualcomm

Philip Morris International

EDF

North America

North America

2

D+

Oracle

D+

Hewlett Packard

Healthcare

Healthcare

Retailing

North America

North America

Consumer Staples

Information Technology

Utilities

Sector

Consumer Staples

Information Technology

Airlines and Logistics

Telecommunications

Consumer Staples

Industrials

Europe

North America

Region

North America

Information Technology

Media

North America

Europe

North America

Asia

North America

Consumer Staples

Europe

North America

Europe

Honeywell International

North America

Europe

North America

Europe

Pfizer

D+

D+

3

Hitachi

Oceania

Europe

Europe

Sanofi

Toyota Motor

General Motors

Airbus Group

Volkswagen

Europe

Asia

General Electric

Asia

British American Tobacco

Chemicals

Telecommunications

Automotive

Industrials

Airlines and Logistics

Materials

Energy

6

Industrials

Industrials

Energy

Consumer Staples

D+

Moller Maersk Group

InfluenceMap Performance Band

Organization

D+

Enel

D+

D+

D+

E.ON

Suncor Energy

BHP Billiton

Verizon Communications

North America

21

16

10

28

North America

North America

Information Technology

Automotive

Automotive

22

18

23

Europe

Healthcare

North America

34

20

30

Retailing

Energy

Sector

Industrials

Airlines and Logistics

Utilities

Europe

North America

Utilities

United Parcel Service

DuPont

Nissan

BMW Group

Automotive

Europe

Asia

Region

D+

D

D

D

20

9

10

9

36

Engagement Intensity

48

Europe

Europe

North America

North America

North America

Automotive

Healthcare

ENI

D

D

D

D-

24

7

12

Royal Dutch Shell

Walgreens Boots Alliance

D

D

D

IBM

45

21

16

11

D-

D-

D

D

D

D

Industrials

Healthcare

North America

Europe

Sector

Roche Group

Automotive

North America

North America

Organization

North America

Asia

North America

Telecommunications

Healthcare

Healthcare

Materials

10

Hutchison Whampoa

Mitsubishi Corporation

5

12

8

19

16

Automotive

Airlines and Logistics

28

9

9

Healthcare

Information Technology

Retailing

13

8

19

10

CVS Health

40

Automotive

E+

E+

E+

E

Cargill

E

E

E

D-

D-

D-

InfluenceMap Performance Band

D-

E+

E+

E+

E+

E

E

E+

E+

Home Depot

Daimler

Delta Air Lines

D-

D-

E+

Engagement Intensity

Time Warner

Total

Telecommunications

9

North America

4

Retailing

Asia

North America

Europe

Europe

North America

North America

North America

North America

Europe

Asia

16

35

27

12

28

12

13

Chemicals

7

Chemicals

Commercial Services

Europe

North America

Europe

North America

Intel

Boeing

E+

Ford Motor

Telecommunications

Bayer

E+

Merck

Energy

Media

BASF

4

Lukoil

Materials

Region

Energy

North America

Europe

Rio Tinto Group

Schlumberger

Dow Chemical

UnitedHealth Group

AT&T

America Movil

Energy

Hyundai Motor

Occidental Petroleum

Organization

InfluenceMap Performance Band

BP

Exxon Mobil

Utilities

Energy

F

Duke Energy

Energy

F

Energy

Media

Sector

Comcast

Berkshire Hathaway

North America

Asia

Reliance Industries

F

Koch Industries

North America

Europe

Region

North America

North America

Media

Energy

Industrials

Industrials

Energy

Commercial Services

Consumer Staples

North America

North America

Engagement Intensity

32

North America

19

North America

Asia

North America

North America

North America

Information Technology Asia

21st Century Fox

Mitsui & Co

5

Chevron

10

Energy

35

28

Phillips 66

F

E-

E-

Procter & Gamble

14

7

15

15

Energy

E-

E-

E-

E-

E

E

E

E

E-

Caterpillar

17

9

37

38

10

Hon Hai Precision Industry

7

D+

International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)

Utilities

Europe

Business Roundtable

Sector

Europe

All Sectors

Automotive

Europe

Asia

US Chamber of Commerce

6

North America

Europe

Europe

International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA)

South America

European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA)

Europe

Organization

E

Influencers InfluenceMap Performance Band

C-

C-

C-

Chemicals

Europe

Europe

Region

Asia

16

Engagement Intensity

Asia

North America

Europe

19

19

43

21

All Sectors

31

19

7

Chemicals

35

All Sectors

All Sectors

18

20

Chemicals

Automotive

C-

D-

D-

D-

D

D

22

All Sectors

Chemicals

Federation of Korean Industries (FKI)

German Automotive Association (VDA)

Confederation of Indian Industry (CII)

Eurelectric

D-

D-

Business Europe

National Confederation of Industry Brazil (CNI) International Federation of Industrial EnergyConsumers (IFIEC) German Industrial Federation (BDI)

Japan Chemical Industry Association (JCIA)

European Roundtable of Industrialists (ERT)

The Business Council of Australia

E

E+

D-

D-

E+

E-

E

E

E-

Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers

Confederation of British Industry (CBI)

All Sectors

North America

Europe

Asia

Oceania

All Sectors

North America

42

30

American ChemistryCouncil (ACC)

Japan Business Federation (Keidanren)

27

28

26

All Sectors

Chemicals

All Sectors

32

25

39

39

Automotive

All Sectors

Europe

Europe

German Chemical Industry Association (VCI)

European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC)

36

Chemicals

Chemicals

All Sectors

InfluenceMap Performance Band

E-

F

F

F

F

F

Organization

Federation of French Industry (MEDEF)

National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)

International Air Transport Association (IATA)

Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers

American Petroleum Institute (API)

American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)

Engagement Intensity

7

39

45

25

28

34

40

Sector

All Sectors

All Sectors

Airlines and Logistics

Energy

All Sectors

Region

Europe

North America

North America

Global

North America

North America

Notes on Our Scoring The Organization Scores To measure and score corporate influence on climate change policy, we have developed a comprehensive process of examining a series of publicly available and reliable data sources (e.g. legislative consultations, respected press, CDP responses) and querying them, for each corporation, against a set of climate change policy and legislation related queries (e.g. position on a carbon tax, energy efficiency standards). We score each data source/query intersection (or cell) on a 5point scale, with clearly consistent evidence and guidelines for our scorers. There are 96 such scoring cells at present and the Organizational Score for each corporation is computed over these, by our proprietary algorithm that accounts for weightings and irrelevant data sources/queries. The Organizational Score is expressed as a % with 100% representing very supportive influence on climate policy. We note here that a corporation and an influencer (e.g. a trade body, chamber of commerce, advocacy group) are scored in exactly the same way to arrive at their respective Organizational Score. The Relationship Scores A corporation, as well as its Organizational Score will have a Relationship Score. It is computed by aggregating the Organizational Scores of the Influencers (trade bodies etc.) it has relationships with, weighted by both the strength of these relationships and the relative importance of the Influencers towards climate change policy. A corporation will have a number of relationships with Influencers mapped in our database. In turn these Influencers will themselves have organizational scores as computed by exactly the same method as was done for the corporations. Such relationships vary in nature and strength and we account for this in our assessment by assigning Relationship Strengths. For example a trade association may have 2000 member corporations with 10 of them on its executive committee. The 10 Executive Committee members would have strength of 8 compared to 3 for the regular members, for example. The Performance Bands For Corporations, the Organizational Scores and Relationship Scores are combined to result in an Overall Rating that places the Corporation in a Performance Band. There are 20 performance bands from A+ (representing a total score from 95100%) through to E (a score of 2530%), with scores below 25% falling in the red "F" band. So it is a relative scale. Most companies fall within the 4555% band that indicates they are neither actively obstructing nor supporting the climate policy process. A score of 60% or more indicates the company is actively supporting polices and regulations towards a low carbon future. Conversely lower than a 40% band generally indicates obstructing behavior. As different sectors face differing regulatory issues, it is most useful to compare the Performance Bands of corporations within the same sector. Engagement Intensity The engagement intensity is a metric of the extent to which the company is engaging on climate change policy matters, whether positively or negatively. It is a number from 0 (no engagement at all) to 100 (full engagement on all queries/data points. Clearly energy and energy intensive users more affected by climate regulations will have a higher engagement intensity than, for example retailers. So an organization’s score should be looked at in conjunction with this metric to understand the amount of evidence we are using in each case to base our score on. Full details on our scoring can be foundhere.

8