District Comparison of Benchmark Status Math

Gayle

Description

Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status - Whole Group2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08 READINGDistrict Report2005-06 Benchmark Status 2006-07 Benchmark Status 2007-08 Benchmark StatusGradeExceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low TotalGrade 3 N 1679 1327 171 107 43 3327 1341 1468 224 246 63 3342 1522 1393 190 217 55 3377% 50% 40% 5% 3% 1% 100% 40% 44% 7% 7% 2% 100% 45% 41% 6% 6% 2% 100%Grade 4 N 1387 1655 163 115 53 3373 1373 1341 317 194 71 3296 1545 1300 241 188 45 3319% 41% 49% 5% 3% 2% 100% 42% 41% 10% 6% 2% 100% 47% 39% 7% 6% 1% 100%Grade 5 N 1037 1813 272 168 71 3361 942 1485 536 275 66 3304 1050 1444 499 205 50 3248% 31% 54% 8% 5% 2% 100% 29% 45% 16% 8% 2% 100% 32% 44% 15% 6% 2% 100%Grade 6 N 1115 1412 221 281 32 3061 1028 1503 436 211 66 3244 1143 1412 460 181 32 3228% 36% 46% 7% 9% 1% 100% 32% 46% 13% 7% 2% 100% 35% 44% 14% 6% 1% 100%Grade 7 N 1515 1089 424 216 37 3281 1134 1286 412 163 24 3019 1238 1339 500 148 10 3235% 46% 33% 13% 7% 1% 100% 38% 43% 14% 5% 1% 100% 38% 41% 15% 5% 0% 100%Grade 8 N 1211 1114 565 320 41 3251 853 1561 396 350 79 3239 942 1205 511 286 38 2982% 37% 34% 17% 10% 1% 100% 26% 48% 12% 11% 2% 100% 32% 40% 17% 10% 1% 100%Grade 10 N 613 1111 778 545 80 3127 623 1319 401 621 50 3014 561 1338 406 569 36 2910% 20% 36% 25% 17% 3% 100% 21% 44% 13% 21% 2% 100% 19% 46% 14% 20% 1% 100%Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year. It became harder ...

Informations

• Publié par: Phoon
• Nombre de lectures: 5
• Langue: English

Extrait

Total Exceeds

Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status - Whole Group

2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08 READING

Total

Exceeds Meets

Near

2005-06 Benchmark Status

2006-07 Benchmark Status

2007-08 Benchmark Status

Low Very Low

Meets

Near

Low Very Low

Exceeds Meets

Near

Low Very Low Total

District Report

Grade

N

%

1679

171

43

Grade 3

1327

107

50%

5%

1%

40%

3%

1341

224

63

1468

246

40%

7%

2%

44%

7%

1522

190

55

1393

217

45%

6%

2%

41%

6%

3327

100%

3342

100%

3377

100%

N

%

1387

163

53

Grade 4

1655

115

41%

5%

2%

49%

3%

1373

317

71

1341

194

42%

10%

2%

41%

6%

1545

241

45

1300

188

47%

7%

1%

39%

6%

3373

100%

3296

100%

3319

100%

N

%

1037

272

71

Grade 5

1813

168

31%

8%

2%

54%

5%

942

536

66

1485

275

29%

16%

2%

45%

8%

1050

499

50

1444

205

32%

15%

2%

44%

6%

3361

100%

3304

100%

3248

100%

N

%

1115

221

32

Grade 6

1412

281

36%

7%

1%

46%

9%

1028

436

66

1503

211

32%

13%

2%

46%

7%

1143

460

32

1412

181

35%

14%

1%

44%

6%

3061

100%

3244

100%

3228

100%

N

%

1515

424

37

Grade 7

1089

216

46%

13%

1%

33%

7%

1134

412

24

1286

163

38%

14%

1%

43%

5%

1238

500

10

1339

148

38%

15%

0%

41%

5%

3281

100%

3019

100%

3235

100%

N

%

1211

565

41

Grade 8

1114

320

37%

17%

1%

34%

10%

853

396

79

1561

350

26%

12%

2%

48%

11%

942

511

38

1205

286

32%

17%

1%

40%

10%

3251

100%

3239

100%

2982

100%

N

%

613

778

80

Grade 10

1111

545

20%

25%

3%

36%

17%

623

401

50

1319

621

21%

13%

2%

44%

21%

561

406

36

1338

569

19%

14%

1%

46%

20%

3127

100%

3014

100%

2910

100%

Note:

Because of problems with the state's computer-based assessment system (TESA) in early 2007, testing on it was discontinued and most students took paper-pencil tests in May.

Students who met state standards on

TESA between January and March were not retested in May.

Many of those students might have exceeded state standards and had higher test scores had they been retested.

Readers should keep this situation in mind

when reviewing reports showing percent Exceeding for 2006-07 or test score gains from 2005-06.

Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year.

It became harder for students to meet Reading and Math standards at grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and, in Reading only, grade 7.

It became easier to meet

Reading and Math standards at grades 10 and, in Math only, grade 8.

The grade 7 Math and grade 8 Reading standard did not change.

Research, Evaluation & Assessment—08/05/08gw(2008-00113)

Total Exceeds

Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status - Whole Group

2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08 MATHEMATICS

Total

Exceeds Meets

Near

2005-06 Benchmark Status

2006-07 Benchmark Status

2007-08 Benchmark Status

Low Very Low

Meets

Near

Low Very Low

Exceeds Meets

Near

Low Very Low Total

District Report

Grade

N

%

1403

200

19

Grade 3

1571

126

42%

6%

1%

47%

4%

943

219

86

1553

543

28%

7%

3%

46%

16%

1181

197

80

1562

366

35%

6%

2%

46%

11%

3319

100%

3344

100%

3386

100%

N

%

1398

160

21

Grade 4

1679

117

41%

5%

1%

50%

3%

878

292

88

1641

395

27%

9%

3%

50%

12%

1003

277

60

1674

301

30%

8%

2%

50%

9%

3375

100%

3294

100%

3315

100%

N

%

1002

261

57

Grade 5

1928

112

30%

8%

2%

57%

3%

1117

318

75

1304

488

34%

10%

2%

39%

15%

1144

232

45

1483

337

35%

7%

1%

46%

10%

3360

100%

3302

100%

3241

100%

N

%

1070

248

69

Grade 6

1401

264

35%

8%

2%

46%

9%

1137

311

67

1333

398

35%

10%

2%

41%

12%

1297

316

59

1249

306

40%

10%

2%

39%

9%

3052

100%

3246

100%

3227

100%

N

%

1491

374

69

Grade 7

1047

300

45%

11%

2%

32%

9%

1132

293

43

1195

358

37%

10%

1%

40%

12%

1236

296

26

1461

212

38%

9%

1%

45%

7%

3281

100%

3021

100%

3231

100%

N

%

1406

467

143

Grade 8

906

323

43%

14%

4%

28%

10%

1154

321

43

1282

448

36%

10%

1%

39%

14%

1137

349

20

1076

403

38%

12%

1%

36%

14%

3245

100%

3248

100%

2985

100%

N

%

502

879

199

Grade 10

1009

533

16%

28%

6%

32%

17%

538

352

61

1119

890

18%

12%

2%

38%

30%

453

448

46

1153

797

16%

15%

2%

40%

28%

3122

100%

2960

100%

2897

100%

Note:

Because of problems with the state's computer-based assessment system (TESA) in early 2007, testing on it was discontinued and most students took paper-pencil tests in May.

Students who met state standards on

TESA between January and March were not retested in May.

Many of those students might have exceeded state standards and had higher test scores had they been retested.

Readers should keep this situation in mind

when reviewing reports showing percent Exceeding for 2006-07 or test score gains from 2005-06.

Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year.

It became harder for students to meet Reading and Math standards at grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and, in Reading only, grade 7.

It became easier to meet

Reading and Math standards at grades 10 and, in Math only, grade 8.

The grade 7 Math and grade 8 Reading standard did not change.

Research, Evaluation & Assessment—08/05/08gw(2008-00113)