OAG08-Audit Group 11

Kruss

Description

Hay Group Insight2008 Employee Survey EOffice of the Auditor General of CanadaOrganization Group: Audit Group 11June, 2008© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights ReservedTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageI. Overview of ResultsResponse RateProfile ChartsII. Detailed Results Overall Rating 1Perceived Impact of Work 2Vision and Direction of the Office 3Office Values 5Personal Values 7Management of the Office 8© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved1 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageII. Detailed Results (continued)Organizational Intentions 10Work Unit 11Supervision 14Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives 18Career Management 22Career Progress 24Promotion Process 28Resource allocation 29Pressures at work 30Stress 32© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved2 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPage II. Detailed Results (continued)Work/Life Balance 32Work Arrangements 33Work Environment 34Harassment 35Discrimination 36Respectful Workplace 37Language of Work 38Official Languages 39Language Training 41Departures 43Concluding Impressions 44© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved3 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYI. Overview of ResultsHay Group InsightResponse RateNumber of Percentage of Number of Number ofRespondents Respondents Respondents Respondents2008 2008 2006 2004___________________________________________________________Total OAG 555 ...

Sujets

• management

Informations

• Publié par: Mosur
• Nombre de lectures: 9
• Langue: English

Extrait

Hay GroupInsight

2008Employee Survey Officeof the Auditor General of Canada

Organization Group: Audit Group 11

© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved

June, 2008

Response Rate Profile Charts

Hay GroupInsight

Table of Contents

1 2 3 5 7 8

Page

II. Detailed Results Overall Rating Perceived Impact of Work Vision and Direction of the Office Office Values Personal Values Management of the Office

I. O

02©aH80rGy1RgithseResvrdeoupLimited.All YEVRUSE0820GOAYELOMPE vreievRsewfostlu

LpuorGyaH8002©ghRilAl.editim2 YEV ev O d GA2 stRsere OYEESUR008EMPL

10 11 14 18 22 24 28 29 30 32

Page

Hay GroupInsight

II. Detailed Results (continued) Organizational Intentions Work Unit Supervision Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives Career Management Career Progress Promotion Process Resource allocation Pressures at work Stress

Table of Contents

3uopyrG80aH©02igRllAd.temiLi GAO devreseRsth 0280EPMOLEYEUSRVEY

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 43 44

Page

II. Detailed Results (continued) Work/Life Balance Work Arrangements Work Environment Harassment Discrimination Respectful Workplace Language of Work Official Languages Language Training Departures Concluding Impressions

Table of Contents

Hay GroupInsight

008EMPL ved OAG2EVYYOEESRU .editimLuproGreseRsthgiRllA4H8ya2©00

Audit Group 11 - Maxwell

I. Overview of Results

Response Rate

Total OAG

21 78%

Hay GroupInsight

---

---

555 93%

545

450

Number of Percentage of Number of Number of Respondents Respondents Respondents Respondents 2008 2008 2006 2004 ___________________________________________________________

tothecompared riceltyacnebd ioat.nsrgoizanoforehtuserstlineredlustrecsnatsoiqeuTeh leddmieTh . ƒ rsotcafrospuorg 7 githseResvrde AO pLimited.AllR VRUSYE20GE08LOMPEYE oeviwgnwhcvreiƒTollohefoitseuq8tahtsnumstsar2zerima gatnfoep eh ecrewesrhompeyelofvauoarseopdndeAGandthblyinO ad yaHllarevoe thorNofkanbtaaginnroiracAem chaƒThe ons.zati li0ineicndesatehtyaHroNofmrthatgroupoftime.s Tƒehpolttulesredicnditsehtetanereffidpercce(devient)nbtaoinetteew reearCorctfaehtrofnosirapmoalcorichistnoersiTƒeh no.sseit ImgesprcloninudtroCehsirafnocalcomphistori tn ƒ . 0260 aManegem rpelihwgnidivotiesqufdansonfaegoreounbmarertsveraana otsepsificuqcmankasspreseonnosfoterdn,sc overall indicati lierpfohte uhs oupsegrthesfor sllatolpotatts,orctfayveur ocnielpmyameb.te

Hay GroupInsight

Profiled Factors

autithcsquonano1seitaws-04 fasonsioushorct rt ebdl iwdetae ps,theremaybeisnfuificnetad tnokeasind002 Fƒ .6 sroemouorg ©2008HayGrou5

esvrde AO githseRd.AllRpLimite VRUSYELOMPEYE20GE08 6HayGrou©2008

-30

OAG 2008

OAG 2006

Career Management

Monetary & Non- Monetary Incentives  Resource allocation

Stress

30

10

20

Concluding Impressions

0

-10

OAG 2004

Overall Results - Total OAG

-20

Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office

Supervision

Stress

-10

Career Management

30

10

0

-20

20

Concluding Impressions

-30

Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office

Organization Group: Audit Group 11

Audit Group 11-2008

Resource allocation

Monetary & Non- Monetary Incentives

Supervision

RllA.deRsthgi OA edrvse E0820GEYEPMOLYEUSVR 7©0280HayGroupLimite

HayGroup

Q. 1a1 Overall, how would you rate the Office as an organization to work for?

Organization Group 1a-Overall Rating

11% 1% +6 +18 +28 +24

Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff Group Valid N  Average BelowAboveAverage Average  Pub fromfrom from 2006 2004 Sec Norm

Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 11Neil Maxwell 21

88%

95%

Q. 1a2 How would you rate the Office as a place to work now, compared with two years ago?

Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff About the same It's Not as Good Now from from Pub from 2006 2004 Sec Norm

5% - - +35 +31

Group Valid N It's Better Now

6% -8 +4 - +3

56%

38%

Total Office of the Auditor 432 General (OAG) Audit Group 11Neil Maxwell 138%

8% - - - -27

84%

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

Page 1

wxaMlielletsfor:Resuluop11NuAidtrG

suRe11roupMaxNeilof:rtlstiGAdullew

91%

Total Office of the Auditor 548 General (OAG) Audit Group 11Neil Maxwell 21

Q. 1b2 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization where I can clearly perceive the effectiveness of my work Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff id N  from from Pub from  GroupVal Very Satisfied Not Neutral at all Satisfied  Norm2006 2004 Sec

90%

HayGroup

Organization Group 1b-Perceived Impact of work

Q. 1b1 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization that contributes to the public good Percent of Respondents Diff Diff Diff Diff GroupValid N  at all Satisfied Not NeutralVery Satisfied orf oN m ceS ubPmro 0420 f 60 m 02 for rm

8% 1% +7 +4 - -

14% - - +9 +2

86%

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

Page 2

19% 6% +16 +22 -2 -9

75%

Total Office of the Auditor 547 General (OAG) Audit Group 11Neil Maxwell 21

10% - - - -

19% 8% +2 +11 - -

14% 5% - - - -

Diff Diff Diff Diff from from Pub from Tend to Disagree 2006 2004 Sec Norm

Diff Diff Diff Diff T o Disagree from from end t m24006NorceS  200 fbruoPm

Diff Diff Diff Diff Tend to Disagree morf S ubProf m02r mm 6o0N orf 2004 ec

5% - - - +36

6% 1% +2 +9 - +34

Page 3

Total Office of the Auditor 553 General (OAG) Audit Group 11Neil Maxwell 21

93%

95%

5% - - - -

6% 1% +3 +9 - -

HayGroup

OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008

81%

93%

Total Office of the Auditor 551 General (OAG) Audit Group 11Neil Maxwell 21

Q. 1c2 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I have a good understanding of the vision and values of the Office Percent of Respondents GroupValid N  Agree nor NeitherTend to Agree Disagree

Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 11Neil Maxwell 21

95%

Q. 1c3 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I support the vision and values of the Office Group Valid N Tend to Agree

Percent of Respondents Neither Agree nor Disagree

73%

Q. 1c1 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I understand where the Office is going over the next two years Percent of Respondents GroupValid N  Agree norTend to Agree Neither Disagree

Organization Group 1c-Vision and Direction of the Office

orfAu:esRtsulllMaxwelp11NieidtrGuo