2008 Mammo Benchmark
1 page
Slovak

2008 Mammo Benchmark

-

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
1 page
Slovak
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

Description

2008 Mammography Center Benchmark Table of Contents Mammography Procedure Volume 1 Distribution of Mammography Procedures and Sites, by Site Type, 2008....................................................................1 Estimated Mammography Procedure Volume, Hospital vs. Non-Hospital Locations, 1999-2008................................1 Average Mammography Procedures per Site, by Site Type, 2008 ................................................................................2 Averagmocper Mammography Unit, by Site Type, 2008......................................................2 Distribution of Sites by Total Mammography Procedures per Year, by Site Type, 2007..............................................3 Mix of Screening vs. Diagnostic Procedures, All Sites, 2007...................3 Average Screening vs. Diagnostic Mammography Procedures per Site, by Site Type, 2007........................................3 Department Locations of Mammography Centers 4 Department Profile of Hospital-Based Mammography Locations, as of 2008 Study....................................................4 Service Scope of Non-Hospital Mammography Locations, as of 2008 Study...............................................................4 Ownership Type of Non-Hospital Mammography Locations, as of 2008 Study...........................................................4 Characteristics of the X-ray Mammography Installed Base 5 Total Mammography Sites and Units, Hospitals vs. ...

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 29
Langue Slovak

Extrait

2008 Mammography Center Benchmark Table of Contents
1Mammography Procedure VolumeDistribution of Mammography Procedures and Sites, by Site Type, 2008....................................................................1 Estimated Mammography Procedure Volume, Hospital vs. Non-Hospital Locations, 1999-2008................................1 Average Mammography Procedures per Site, by Site Type, 2008 ................................................................................2 Average Mammography Procedures per Mammography Unit, by Site Type, 2008......................................................2 Distribution of Sites by Total Mammography Procedures per Year, by Site Type, 2007..............................................3 Mix of Screening vs. Diagnostic Procedures, All Sites, 2007 .......................................................................................3 Average Screening vs. Diagnostic Mammography Procedures per Site, by Site Type, 2007........................................3 4Department Locations of Mammography Centers Department Profile of Hospital-Based Mammography Locations, as of 2008 Study....................................................4 Service Scope of Non-Hospital Mammography Locations, as of 2008 Study...............................................................4 Ownership Type of Non-Hospital Mammography Locations, as of 2008 Study...........................................................4 5Characteristics of the X-ray Mammography Installed Base Total Mammography Sites and Units, Hospitals vs. Non-Hospitals, as of 2008 Study.................................................5 Distribution of Sites by Number of Mammography Units Installed, by Site Type, as of 2008 Study...........................5 Distribution of X-ray Mammography Installed Base, by Year of Installation, Hospital and Non-Hospital Locations, as of 2008 Study.........................................................................................................................................................5 Percentage of Mammography Units that are Digital (FFDM & CR) vs. Film-Screen, as of 2008 Study......................6 Trend in Digital vs. Conventional Mammography Procedures, 2005 & 2007...............................................................6 Whether Sites with Digital Mammography Units Still Use Hard Copy Films, as of 2008 Study..................................6 7Variation of Procedures per Unit, by Number of Mammography Units Installed Mean Annual Procedure Volume per Mammo Unit, by Number of Units Installed per Site, 2007 ..............................7 Number of Mammography Units per Site vs. Annual Mammography Procedure Volume...........................................7 Staffing Configurations8 Percent of Mammography Sites with Staff Types, by Site Type, as of 2008 Study ......................................................8 Mean FTE Staff per Mammography Site Having that Type, by Site Type, as of 2008 Study.......................................8 9Women's Health Care Offerings at Mammography Centers Whether Mammography Center Currently Offers Specific Women's Health Care Services, Hospital vs.  Non-HospitalLocations, as of 2008 Study.................................................................................................................9 Productivity 10 Average Annual Mammography Procedures per FTE Technologist and Total FTE Staff, Hospital and  Non-HospitalLocations, 2007 .................................................................................................................................10 Total FTE Staff vs. Annual Mammography Procedure Volume .................................................................................10 Total FTE Technologists vs. Annual Mammography Procedure Volume...................................................................10 11Radiologists and Oncologists Associated with Mammography Centers Percent of Mammography Sites with Radiologists Involved with Breast Imaging at This Location, by Site Type, as of2008Study...........................................................................................................................................................11Percent of Mammography Sites with Oncologists Involved with Breast Care at This Location, by Site Type, as of 2008 Study ...............................................................................................................................................................11 Lead Time to Schedule a Screening Mammography Appointment12 Lead Time to Schedule a Screening Mammography Appointment, by Site Type, as of 2008 Study ..........................12 Lead Time to Schedule a Screening Mammography Appointment, by IMV Study Year, 2000-2008 ........................12 Source of Service for Mammography Installed Base12 Source of Service for Mammography Installed Base, as of 2008 Study......................................................................12 Data Collection and Methodology13 inside back coverAbout IMV Medical Information Division
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents