Iffflight Patterns in E'er

Denny Farrell

Description

Another one of those books the bible should have been. Iffflight Patterns in E’er unleashes the Farrellian Sonnet once upon a time again, ontransforming poetry and metaphysics along with it. Demonstrating that eternity just might not be wasting its time after all, this book subsequences THE CHARM OF BEING, THE SONNET FILES, THE M’ETERNITY WARD and THE ROMANCE OF BEING to change forever what forever might be up to. This book’s newsy new eternity puts just ont I’m’s when’e’ers smack dab in the middle of the middle of the middle of the ides of e’er’s tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow half time show for todays and todays and today’s e’ereadershipmentalents. With Miss Eternity e’eriding shotgun, the ides of e’er’s god or no god never had it so god.

Sujets

• Poetry

Informations

• Publié par: iUniverse
• Date de parution: 07 septembre 2022
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9781663242945
• Langue: English

Extrait

IFFFLIGHT PATTERNS IN E’ER
OF NOT NE’ER’S NIGHT
DENNY FARRELL


IFFFLIGHT PATTERNS IN E’ER OF NOT NE’ER’S NIGHT
 
Copyright © 2022 Denny Farrell.
 
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the author except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews.
 
 
 
 
 
iUniverse
1663 Liberty Drive
Bloomington, IN 47403
www.iuniverse.com
844-349-9409
 
Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.
 
Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Getty Images are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.
Certain stock imagery © Getty Images.
 
ISBN: 978-1-6632-4293-8 (sc)
ISBN: 978-1-6632-4294-5 (e)
 
Library of Congress Control Number: 2022913992
 
 
 
iUniverse rev. date: 08/26/2022
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
PART I
1. MY SUM DAY’S SCHOOL IN E’ER
2. UKALELE UNIVERSES
3. LOLLIPOPPED IFFFFE’ER
4. ICKICKING BEBLES OVER FENCES
5. I’MANIA
6. I’MELODIES
7. PLANCK LIMITS
8. MY ONTOLOGICAL CAREER
9. BEBLE GUMPTION
10. IFFFFFALLING THROUGH ETERNITY
11. GOURMET NICE DREAMS
12. OF EDIBLE SOCIETY
13. COSMIC IMMERSION
14. M’ETERNITY’S M’OBSERVATORY
15. ONTELLIGENCED ETERNITY
16. IN BED WITH GOD
17. GOD’S EGO SUM
18. TO BE’S PECULIARITY
19. ONTQUELY AS IFFFFORMATIVE
20. ONCE MATTER’S IN THE MOOD
21. X RATED PROJECTION
22. OF ONT I’M’OBVIOUSITY
23. AS SUBJECT TO OBJECTIONS
24. STANDING ON THE CORNER
25. FEMINNOVATION
PART II
26. THE MUSIC OF HER HEMISPHERE
27. ONTOGENISIS
28. COSMOSIS ON THE SIDE LINES
29. E’ERIVALS AT NOT NEVER’S NEST
30. NOCTURNED I NOON
31. IFFFFE’EREDEMPTIONS
32. THE’S THEORY OF PREGNANT ZEROS
33. EGGGODEPICTED
34. IFFFONTIQUAINTRADITIONS
35. HOMETOWN ETERNITY’S HALF-LIFE
36. THE’S WHATE’ER TROUGH
37. EGGGOLF OF COURSES
38. FRIENDLY SHARED POWERS *
39. M’E’ERISTOCRATIC DINOSAURS
40. TO POLISH KIDS
41. TO BEG THE RIVER TO DECIDE
42. PRINCIPIA THOUARTICA
43. COOKED OUT OF MATTER
44. E’ERUDIMENTS OF PARADISE
45. HOME MADE E’ER
46. LIGHT FIXTURES
47. ETERNITY’S INTENDED
48. GROTESQUELY LOVELY
49. WHEN TO BE’S BATTERIES RUN OUT
50. THE HORIZON HOME
 
GLOSSARY
LETTERS FROM THE HOLOCOASTERIDER
INTRODUCTION
Ifffffffffffffffffff( )ffffffffffffffff 1. Eternity may be conceived as more than a strictly mathematical construct on non-finite temporality and 2. Any given objective universe may be viewed as a samplifffffication of an ontological reality(e’erealty) that exceeds its cosmic limits, then one may ask the question: at what point in an intellect’s developmental life can that life confront the complexities of this metaphysical situation and come to terms with it. At what age can a child that is 1. Born in a cosmos that 2. Occurs within the ifffframework of a larger ontological e’erealm…………….recognize this metaphysical situation as it is and put the dichotomodious puzzle in becomprehensively preposte’erological perspective. If reality does emerge with two kinds of {{things}} to think about 1. Cosmically objective things(entities) and 2. Ontologically subjective onthings (ontities) how and when can this cosmontological becomplexity be puzzled together. In other words, ifffff reality behaves both onts and ents, at what developmental stage can a conscious being function cognitively with the interactions of ontitutudes and entitudes, of onts and ents, in his daily life. And furthermore what is the proper metaphysical etiquette for onts and ents to…….e’eride herd on each other.
Well, it must be admitted that, in the metaphysical battleground, between ontos and cosmos , for what is real, the given universe of this metaphysical complex starts out with the upper hand. In this dichotomodious exchange of realities, the ontological side of the coin is pretty much becompletely hidden, which is to say, covered up. Life begins with complete immersion in whatever objective universe is at hand. The basic fact of ontologically subjective(notnot) being, is initially completely eclipsed by the fact that that being is objectively immersed in a world of objects. These are the ents of cosmic persuasion. And they easily eclipse the’s onts of ‘not not ontovation’. The metaphysical purpose of this book is to put aside at least some of the cosmic coverup of the onts by the ents, the coverup of presentable eternity’s ontological ground by the universe’s cosmic ground. Since this book is IN an objective universe, as its author, I shall afford all due respect that universe as such. HowEVER, since the subject of these texts involves M’ETERNITY’S PRESENTABILITY, which is to say, GREATE’ER BEING’S ABILITIES, being the ontemporal limits of the object driven universe, greate’er attention will be focused on the’s not not ontovation than the more localized universe persuasion. The reader’s attention spans will be directed to the fact that beyond the confines of a locally iffffffished out universe, there is something behind that universe. There is an a prioritizable ontique iffffffffactory as sets the’s ontheorhetorical stage in the’s behind of that universe’s beyonde’eries. The yoked-up universe, persuasive as it is, occurs, I will suggest, as it eterns out, yoked up to the greater theory setting of THE’S GREATE’ER ONTHEORY SETTING. This dicotomodious exchange of realties is not easy to fathom. To fathom this metaphysical situation is indeed a profound achievement. It is this author’s postulation that there is a window of opportunity here for this metaphysical achievement. As it turns out, the longer a given life is immersed in this strictly cosmological eclipse s’e’ervice the harder it is to break through to its becombined cosmontological implications. By my calculation the golden age for this breakthrough, this eclipse of this cosmic eclipse service, this “ opening of whene’er’s windows”, that apprehends what must be viewed as an (ontologically) ontransparent universe, is around about six years old.
Let’s graph this situation:
Age 1-5(inchoate infancy)…………Age 6(The ontique shoppe window opens to let in the’s e’er)…..Age 7+ The objective universe takes over (total cosmic immersion).
By about the age of seven, the overwhelming objectitudes of the yoked-up universe, with well equationeered endowments, has cemented this cosmic eclipse s’e’ervice into some very concretely lived in spaces. As this concrete hardens around the psyche of that life, irreversible cosmic immersion may be said to set in. From age seven to the adulthood, this process becomes pretty securely settled. From age seven onward, the child is immersed in an objective universe that feels like all there is and all there can ever be as far as reality is concerned. But, just prior to age seven, as suggested, a brief window of opportunity is available for whene’er’s windows to stand out in the ontological open. And, with this still openned ontological situation, m’eternity’s ontique shoppes are cognitively e’eready to open up for that six-year olde’s ontique shopped business. To review, before the age of six, passive immersion is still inchoately infantile, with few, if any opportunities for metaphysical exploration, in either entoutings that are cosmological or ontoutings that are ontitudinal. By age seven, the actively independent mental powers have become immersed in the dazzling object displays of the rather sensational cosmological realm, with all its emotional pictures and objectrinkets leaping up to the leaped-on mind. The newly emerged independent mind is quickly drowned in the universe. By about seven, the newly emerged subjective being is pretty much buried in the projects of objective being. What one might call “ ifffontrinkets of ontosis”, expe’eriential asifffragments of an ontological ground, at this point, may occur only as phantoms to consciousness. These phantoms as ifffffflight patterned in a vaguely beheld ‘ not never’s night’ have scant power to challenge the universal authority of the cosmic activities objectively at hand. The dismantling of that cosmological construct must occur within a limited developmental moment. This is when the age of six comes in, between infantile immersion and cosmick immersion, to counter, which is to say, to eclipse the eclipse s’e’ervice of the cosmos, bringing the ontos(the ontological e’erealm) out of the cosmic closet………to be m’available for m’ontique shoppe business sprees.
This situation can be summarized both ontologically and psychologically. The speculation here is that, at the age of six, there is a short period between the two developmental immersions…of 1. Infantick(ichoate) immersion and 2. Adulte’erated (cosmic) conversion(commitment to the cosmos). The speculation here is that, at six, there is the opportunity for the freshly independent mind to assess its ontological status, to gaze through the blue skies of the cosmos as if they were cosmic ontransparencies and appraise the’s ontique iffffoundations beyond. This is the moment when {{{being}}} just might be m’available to be onthingable unto itself. This is also the moment when monolithic {{being}} might be able to pro-actiffffffly reevaluate itself as the binary construct of {{not- not-itude}}