Development Against Democracy

Irene L. Gendzier

Description

This new, updated edition of the influential Development Against Democracy is a critical guide to postwar studies of modernisation and development. In the mid-twentieth century, models of development studies were products of postwar American policy. They focused on newly independent states in the Global South, aiming to assure their pro-Western orientation by promoting economic growth, political reform and liberal democracy. However, this prevented real democracy and radical change.



Today, projects of democracy have evolved in a radically different political environment that seems to have little in common with the postwar period. Development Against Democracy, however, testifies to a revealing continuity in foreign policy, including in justifications of 'humanitarian intervention' that echo those of counterinsurgency decades earlier in Latin America, the Middle East and Southeast Asia.



Irene L. Gendzier argues that the fundamental ideas on which theories of modernisation and development rest have been resurrected in contemporary policy and its theories, representing the continuity of postwar US foreign policy in a world permanently altered by globalisation and its multiple discontents, the proliferation of 'failed states,' the unprecedented exodus of refugees, and Washington's declaration of a permanent war against terrorism.
Acknowledgements

Foreword by Thomas Ferguson

Introduction by Robert Vitalis

1. The 'New Look' in Development Studies

2. Making Connections

3. Discourse on Development

4. Transparent Boundaries: From Policies to Studies of Political Development

5. Defining the Parameters of Discourse

6. The Academic Translation: Liberal Democratic Theory and Interpretations of Political Development

7. The Impossible Task of Theories of Political Development

Epilogue

Notes

Index

Sujets

• Political Ideologies
• International Relations
• POLITICAL SCIENCE
• 21st century
• Gabriel Almond
• Sidney Verba
• Lucian Pye
• Edward Shils
• Development studies
• Modernization
• Cold War
• General officer
• Ideology
• Globalization
• Economics
• Development
• Samuel Huntington
• World
• Business
• General
• Democracy
• Guerre froide

Informations

• Publié par: Pluto Press
• Date de parution: 20 août 2017
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9781786801463
• Langue: English

Extrait

Development Against Democracy
Development Against Democracy
Manipulating Political Change in the Third World
NEW EDITION
Irene L. Gendzier
Introduction by Robert Vitalis Foreword by Thomas Ferguson
Originally published 1985 by Westview Press as Managing Political Change: Social Scientists and the Third World
Reissued 1995 by The Tyrone Press as Development Against Democracy: Manipulating Political Change in the Third World .
This new edition published 2017 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA
www.plutobooks.com
Copyright Irene L. Gendzier 1985, 1995, 2017
The right of Irene L. Gendzier to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978 0 7453 3729 6 Hardback
ISBN 978 0 7453 3728 9 Paperback
ISBN 978 1 7868 0145 6 PDF eBook
ISBN 978 1 7868 0147 0 Kindle eBook
ISBN 978 1 7868 0146 3 EPUB eBook





This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental standards of the country of origin.
Typeset by Stanford DTP Services, Northampton, England
Simultaneously printed in the United Kingdom and United States of America
Contents
Acknowledgments
Foreword by Thomas Ferguson
Introduction by Robert Vitalis

1. The New Look in Development Studies
2. Making Connections
3. Discourse on Development
4. Transparent Boundaries: From Policies to Studies of Political Development
5. Defining the Parameters of Discourse
6. The Academic Translation: Liberal Democratic Theory and Interpretations of Political Development
7. The Impossible Task of Theories of Political Development

Epilogue
Notes
Index
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Pluto Press and to David Shulman, Commissioning Editor, whose editorial guidance and support have been unique in my experience. His continuing interest in this project over an extended period of time, made its reprinting possible.
The critical responses offered by anonymous readers made a difference. So did the support of friends and colleagues, including Thomas Ferguson, Zachary Lockman and Robert Vitalis, and Nathan Citino, whose works on the political economy of oil, money and power, Middle East studies and International Relations, have long been sources of inspiration, as was the work of the late Marilyn Young, who was among the first to encourage me to reprint Development Against Democracy , so that her students could finally find a copy of it. Noam Chomsky, provided judicious criticisms of an earlier edition, and was enthusiastic about its reprinting. And finally, I am grateful to my husband, Assaf Kfoury, whose steadfast support was an indispensable element in the completion of this and many other projects.
Foreword
Thomas Ferguson *
Irene Gendzier and Pluto Press are to be congratulated for many reasons, but the most compelling is probably their exquisite timing. As this updated reissue of her classic appears, the Trump administration is bringing out a new edition of its own: a rerun of U.S. foreign policy s past heedless embraces of authoritarian regimes, penchant for secrecy, and reckless overconfidence in the power of military force.
The sometimes disorienting mix of muscular rhetoric, deliberate efforts to look unpredictable, and almost casual talk of boots on the ground, bombings, and the need for new strategic poses is eerily familiar to analysts who lived through the period Dr. Gendzier writes about with such nuance and verve. I certainly remember the department spaces I was enjoined from entering as a young assistant professor at MIT, for want of the requisite security clearances, even as many authors Dr. Gendzier discusses here repaired to them to work, study, or visit. But younger scholars and a new generation of Americans who never experienced the Cold War mostly do not know this history. They are mostly unaware of the close interactions between many major works of Comparative Politics, International Relations, and American foreign policy or the intense coordination among many protagonists with all manner of government and major foundation personnel. They have little or no conception of how thoroughly broad psychological themes pushed out serious discussion of political institutions and economic analysis.
Researchers working on this period report that documents once available have disappeared, even as some new archival materials open up. Irene Gendzier s splendid book is not the last word on its subject, but it is indispensable for anyone trying to understand how theory and reality related to each other then (and since). One might doubt whether understanding this past will be enough by itself to prevent us from making the famous second move from tragedy to farce-the basis of American economic and political power is so much shallower now than in the age of High Cold War.
Development Against Democracy remains, alas, startlingly contemporary. Many of the doctrines it discusses live on in second or third generation versions whose deep structures are only occasionally apprehended. The ease with which these constructions combine with ideology and poor empirical methods to become instrumentalized is breathtaking; Irene Gendzier s fine study merits a wide readership from a new generation of readers.

* Thomas Ferguson is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Introduction
Robert Vitalis *
Thirty-five years ago, on June 6, 1982, Israeli forces invaded and occupied southern Lebanon. Its army and air force laid siege to the capital, Beirut, with the objectives of destroying the Palestinian Liberation Organization, then headquartered there, and installing its Maronite Christian clients in power. I had returned to the United States that summer, where I was a PhD candidate in political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, specializing in the political development of the Middle East, and had taken a two-year leave of absence in Cairo. Through friends in Cambridge, I made contact with a small group of mostly academic activists that had constituted themselves as the Ad Hoc Emergency Committee on Lebanon and as a result found myself handing out leaflets to subway commuters one September evening at the Harvard T Station with one of the committee s founders, Boston University professor Irene Gendzier.
I didn t know it then, but, Gendzier had been considered a rising star in the relatively small U.S. Middle East studies field, back in the 1960s. A historian with a Columbia University PhD, she taught in BU s history and political science departments. Her first book, a scholarly monograph published in 1966 and based on her dissertation, was a critically acclaimed biography of the exiled nineteenth-century Jewish-Egyptian nationalist writer, Yaqub Sanua. She wrote on Arab-Israeli affairs, on Palestine-Israel, in her ahead-of-its-time formulation, and on North Africa for the private, Washington, DC-based Middle East Institute s house organ, the Middle East Journal , which served as the main professional outlet prior to the founding of the Middle East Studies Association in 1966. Gendzier was elected to MESA s board of directors in 1974, but by then her profile and research program had changed, like many others affected by the U.S. wars in Southeast Asia, and she soon resigned in protest of the association s ties to the Central Intelligence Agency and other parts of the national security state. 1
She published her next two books with trade rather than university presses. A Middle East Reader (1969), an edited volume for which Gendzier supplied a critical introductory essay, provided non-specialists with an understanding of regional developments following Israel s defeat of Egypt and Syria in June 1967 and its takeover of the whole of Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza. In 1973 Pantheon published her path-breaking Frantz Fanon: A Critical Study , the first such account of the thought of Fanon, the Martinique-born, French-trained psychiatrist and revolutionary philosopher who had joined the Algerian National Liberation Front. At the same time, sharp analyses of Israel s settlement policies, of the 1975-1976 Lebanese civil war, and of the beginning of U.S. force projection in the Persian Gulf appeared under her byline in the Nation through the last half of the 1970s.
When I met her in 1982, Gendzier was working on revisions of the book you hold in your hands. As she notes in her new opening chapter, it began as a study of the effect of social scientists fascination with what they dubbed modernization or development theory on her own field of Middle East studies, seemingly, as an outgrowth of the criticisms she had raised behind the scenes at MESA. You ll learn more about the so-called theories in the pages to follow. The project though grew bigger, the targets more numerous, as Gendzier dug deeper into the history of the key figures and their auxiliary roles in the violence that the Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy administrations unleashed across Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia.
She was indicting some of the biggest names in the social sciences, many of whom clustered in the Boston-Cambridge area. I had taken seminars with a couple at MIT, and experienced first-hand their contempt for the critics of their intellectual enterprise and refusal to teach or otherwise engage with them. As Gendzier herself notes, by the 1970s these theories had come under withering attack from various ideological and geographical quadrants. I remember one of her own putative comrades, by then rising in the ranks at MIT, wondering aloud to me why she was still bothering with the topic. Many others told her the same thing. 2 They all missed the point. T