Old Bin Laden had a farm…
3 pages
Français

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Old Bin Laden had a farm…

-

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
3 pages
Français
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

Old Bin Laden had a farm…

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 50
Langue Français

Extrait

T
here is no doubt that agri-
terrorism is the poor relation of
‘normal’ terrorism. We are used to
agricultural outbreaks so it is all
wrapped up with established norms, and
as such it rarely grabs either red or blue
force in the same visceral way as a
chemical device at the Superbowl, for
example. But the pair of them are on a
par in terms of the impact that they
would cause. Dr Vroegindewey cites a
case where two cows in the US were
diagnosed with Foot and Mouth Disease,
and the cost to the US (not including
other parts of the world) was $27 billion.
To put that into context, the cost to the
US of the Amerithrax incident is
estimated to be $1 billion: economically,
agri-terrorism has an ability to punch
far above its weight (especially in the
US). Where the two scenarios divide –
Superbowl vs Breakfast Bowl – is in the
layers of security. It would be difficult to
try and gauge the amount of visible and
covert checks that Superbowl spectators
go through before they take their seat,
but suffice to say any attempt to
smuggle a device in would be one of
serious effort and organisation. The
same is not true of agri-terrorism; many
of the desired agents are extremely
hardy, and the ability to insert them into
the system is straightforward (cattle
markets, feed barns, grain silos etc.).
Indeed, in his 2004 resignation speech,
the outgoing Health and Human
Services Secretary, Tommy Thompson
said, “For the life of me, I cannot
understand why the terrorists have not
attacked our food supply because it is so
easy to do.”
Dr Vroegindewey is not new to the
concept of agri-terrorism. Before he
joined the University of Maryland he was
the Director of the DoD Veterinary
Service Activity at the US Army
Veterinary Corps, so he has seen life on
both sides of the divide. He suggested
that the 27 billion dollar figure was not
exceptional (as the Amerithrax figure is
– since lessons learned should cut it
exponentially). He said, “Agri-terrorism
is largely economic terrorism. If you
look at the cost of SARS: 80-90 billion
dollars, total cost, investigation, time
lost, tourism – it is the loss of
commerce and trade. Following mad
cow/BSE in the US, over 100 countries
embargoed the export of US beef and
used it as a trade tool to circumvent
trade treaties, so countries that did not
import US beef to speak of would put an
embargo on it. So the cost was not
investigation or clean-up, which was
pretty minor in terms of response to the
occurrence, the cost was the loss of
trade to our trading partners and the
loss of that trade in exports. If you lose
trade there is knock on to the feed
industry, supplies that the meat
packers need etc.”
The impact of a trade
embargo on the largely
agricultural Midwest
US states is
likely to be large enough to bring the
state to a bankrupt condition and
provoke a massive Federal bail-out.
Indeed Rand studies in California
suggested that the cost to them of a
trade sanction would be one billion
dollars a day for each delay in the
control procedures. That figure is a
55
Spring 2011
CBRNe WORLD
www.cbrneworld.com
CBRNeWORLD
CBRNe Convergence 2011, 1-4 November, Askeri Müze, Istanbul. More information on www.icbrnevents.com
Dr Gary Vroegindewey, Director of the Global Health Initiative, at the
University of Maryland, tells Gwyn Winfield about curbing agri-terrorism
Old Bin Laden
had a farm…
Admit it. You went Aaaahhh. Yet this little piggy could cost the economy millions
©ADP
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents