Anarchism and Socialism

Georgii Valentinovich Plekhanov

Description

The Project Gutenberg eBook, Anarchism andSocialism, by George Plechanoff, Translated byEleanor Marx AvelingThis eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and withalmost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away orre-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License includedwith this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.orgTitle: Anarchism and SocialismAuthor: George PlechanoffRelease Date: November 20, 2009 [eBook #30506]Language: EnglishCharacter set encoding: ISO-8859-1***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ANARCHISM AND SOCIALISM*** E-text prepared by Fritz Ohrenschall, Martin Pettit,and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team(http://www.pgdp.net) Transcriber's Note:Obvious typographical errors have been corrected.An image of the Front cover can be seen here, and of the back cover here.Images of the original pages can be seen by clicking on the page numbers in the right margin. ANARCHISM AND SOCIALISM ANARCHISMANDSOCIALISM BYGEORGE PLECHANOFF Translated with the permission of the author byELEANOR MARX AVELING CHICAGOCHARLES H. KERR & COMPANY Logo CONTENTS.Publishers' Note 7Preface 13 I. The Point of View of the Utopian Socialists 17 II. The Point of View of Scientific Socialism 30 III. The Historical Development of the Anarchist Doctrine 38 IV. Proudhon 53 V. Bakounine 78 VI. Bakounine—(Concluded) 89 VII. The Smaller Fry 103VIII. The So-called ...

Informations

• Publié par: zoug
• Publié le: 08 décembre 2010
• Nombre de lectures: 62
• Langue: English

Extrait

The ProjectG tuneebgre oBkoAn, charm isd S an aicomsilyb ,oeG Plecrge ff, hanolstarTna E y el deb  ar MoraninelAvx g

 

Transcriber's Note:

         

 

ANARCHISM AND SOCIALISM

ND M A

E-text prepared by Fritz Ohrenschall, Martin Pettit, and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)

Obvious typographical errors have been corrected. An image of the Front cover can be seen here, and of the back cover here. Images of the original pages can be seen by clicking on the page numbers in the right margin.

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Anarchism and Socialism Author: George Plechanoff Release Date: November 20, 2009 [eBook #30506] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ANARCHISM AND SOCIALISM***    

ARANISCH

 

SOCIALISM

BY

 

GEORGE PLECHANOFF

Translated with the permission of the author by

 

 

 

 

 

ELEANOR MARX AVELING

CHICAGO CHARLES H. KERR & COMPANY

Logo

 

CONTENTS.

Publishers Note7 ' Preface13  I. The Point of View of the Utopian Socialists17  II. The Point of View of Scientific Socialism30 III. The Historical Development of the Anarchist Doctrine38  IV. Proudhon53  V. Bakounine78  VI. Bakounine—(Concluded)89 VII. The Smaller Fry103 VIII. The So-called Anarchist Tactics. Their Morality127  IX. The Bourgeoisie, Anarchism, and Socialism143

PUBLISHERS' NOTE In reprinting Anarchism and Socialism , by George Plechanoff, we realize that there is not the same need for assailing and exposing anarchism at present as there has been at different times in the past. Yet the book is valuable, not merely because of its historic interest but also to workers coming into contact with the revolutionary movement for the first time. The general conception of anarchism that a beginner often gets is that it is something extremely advanced. It is often expressed somewhat as follows: "After capitalism comes socialism and then comes anarchism." Plechanoff very ably explodes such notions. Within the pages of this work the author shows not only the reactionary character of anarchism, but he exposes its class bias and its empty philosophic idealism and utopian program. He shows anarchism to be just the opposite of scientific socialism or communism. It aims at a society dominated by individualism, which is simply a capitalist ideal. Such ideals as "liberty," "equality," "fraternity," first sprang from the ranks of the petty property owners of early capitalism, as Plechanoff shows. He also points out that while Proudhon is usually credited with being "the father of anarchism" that actually Max Stirner comes closer to being its "father." Stirner's "League of Egoists," he says, "is only the utopia of a petty bourgeois in revolt. In this sense one may say he has spoken the last word of bourgeois individualism." Bakounine and Kropotkine, the famous Russian anarchists, are exposed as confused idealists, who have not aided but rather hindered the development of the working-class movement. Lenin speaks highly of the book in this relation, but takes Plechanoff severely to task for his failure properly to set forth the Marxian concepts of the State, and for his total evasion of the form the State must take during the time it is in the hands of the workers. When writing on the "Vulgarisation of Marx by the Opportunists," in his State and Revolution , Lenin said: "Plechanoff devoted a special pamphlet to the question of the relation of socialism to anarchism entitled Anarchism and Socialism to treat the question without touching on the most vital,, published in German in 1894. He managed somehow controversial point, the essential point politically , in the struggle with the anarchists: the relation of the revolution to State, and the question of the State in general. His pamphlet may be divided into two parts: one, historico-literary, containing valuable material for the history of the ideas of Stirner, Proudhon, and others; the second, ignorant and narrow-minded, containing a clumsy disquisition on the theme 'that an anarchist cannot be distinguished from a bandit,' an amusing combination of subjects and most characteristic of the entire activity of Plechanoff on the eve of revolution and during the revolutionary period in Russia. Indeed, in the years 1908 to 1917 Plechanoff showed himself to be half doctrinaire and half philistine, walking, politically, in the wake of the bourgeoisie. "We saw how Marx and Engels, in their polemics against the anarchists, explained most thoroughly their views on the relation of the revolution to the State. Engels, when editing in 1891, Marx's Criticism of the Gotha Program , wrote that 'we'—that is, Engels and Marx—'were then in the fiercest phase of our battle with Bakounine and his anarchists; hardly two years had then passed since the Hague Congress of the International' (the First). The anarchists had tried to claim the Paris Commune as their 'own,' as a confirmation of their teachings, thus showing that they had not in the least understood the lessons of the Commune or the analysis of those lessons by Marx. Anarchism has given nothing approaching a true solution of the concrete political problems: are we to break up the old State machine, and what shall we put in its place? "But to speak of Anarchism and Socialism , leaving the whole question of the State out of account and taking no notice at all of the whole development of Marxism before and after the Commune—that meant an inevitable fall into the pit of opportunism. For that is just what opportunism wants—to keep these two questions in abeyance. To secure this is, in itself, a victory of opportunism." The anarchist desire to abolish the State at one blow, and to abolish money, etc., in much the same way, springs from their inability to understand the institutions of capitalist society. To many of them the State is simply the result of people having faith in authority. Give up this belief and the State will cease to exist. It is a myth like God and rests entirely on faith. The anarchist's desire for the abolition of the State arises from entirely different concepts to that of the communists. To these anarchist anti-authoritarians the State is simply bad. It is the most authoritarian thing in sight. It interferes with individual freedom and consequently is the greatest obstruction to "absolute liberty" and other utopian desires of the champions of individualism. Communists also want a society without a State but realize that such can only come about when society is without classes. The aim of the communist movement is to destroy the capitalist form of the State and substitute a proletarian form during the time in which society is undergoing its classless transformation. When all property is centralized into the hands of this working-class "State" and when the administration of things has taken the place of political dominance, the State, in its final form, will have withered away. Therefore, the communist realizes that the State cannot be abolished in the manner visualized by anarchists, but that it must be used, that is, the proletariat must be raised "to the position of ruling class," for the purpose of expropriating the capitalists and putting an end to the exploitation of the producing class. The State is not abolished. Only its capitalist form is abolished. The State dies out in the hands of the workers when there is no longer an opposing class to coerce.

 

tor of the  Weekl yiTem sna dcEoh Pry s.es h Ie avt otknaheht idE thro ders the ugh ittewTnetnru heC s  iontivegiw nognE ot naer hsil p pare A . dnih si  book its to the t fow ehitro snopp areeak oratthgnm oliw nlassi se p tho usee to tihwelbbiK .rM , nendki is hor fe, lP eahceffon si  hi ternk  Gasrgeo  ,na drpfouodna arkable a writero emit smer os fhe tatthoucire p ehwhtsoni k oht. Thselfare ere  or s wt,noigntram eh ero ro t foyounger, y of thea erm na,yt eherelatunrtfoun, utB .sgab-dniw tsiarchg Anckin pri dnisaetylw ispm ncre Finwat  Ih. rt neht s detalsnao Ge int by rmanB rerM.sni ,snet Ple haecffno"A, cranmsihdna coS ialism," was writtneo iriganll y oV" eciffO gnihsi s wat  I."tsärrwet dsnalt arentxto Ef inyselby m i deap n dnaussim or tbyhlmp fet noSiclaehG reamtic Publ-Democra i  nhsde eWke ht eermild publit, po ehT . o  lanigir esim Tlych End a cu hfot eht arsnnglish, and so mseic fo caps uow etila aonexs enig hortrm sk fo boo dnisseuebi li llansra tshling Eetelpmoc ehT .yl pearing s now apreisnoi rFnehcv   a e , wnd iaocstli enue S ess t ni J  eh and,Engl in sarycoaiehS ert w eh'sffnohaecPlf  osecen ylbuod si  ed, whersorganissis itll ehtre e enemist stliov megra id ylits l ll e oca ll cnaonimlitid posubjcal gi hcus  ecnaronnfcod anonn ious mano ght ealgrre Socialist organ stcehw ;,eretiw thh  xc e etiep, onht gnoma neve dn(an ioatered FicrctaeDomai-lS co the, ofionsisat A tacranedi ht aor soft  v aueaghtre esiembmre s r S.D.F.  e younge ee bas hit lnon yranoituereht ,)ne ag fievolnd ri  sihmshtniosem ha titt as wer va remi nserpnoisth Anarchism und lt c e qoeuttni giw lincd ne aho iredrowof st ot eka high-sor deeds,rhsasef nuidgnp  ou e s er ms,ct aor  rof yruf dna dny aconarlutirevohw ona dyt ,itiv era ootnuoyro goo tgn ianortot k on whttas cu hsound and fury s on yfingi I .gnihtor fist ak she tt eh efouognesy or fer, he sor t ,ofkl ,gionartnhe more ake of taed  res lahceffonik lPle atthen m ancrfoA et rm tathisith ly wiousemit rieht leef ot ndod an, smhin, as this work l so tfit eh yac trsseo  he e tru t tsumeh ,r pledae  calt is"Analed nani eemw ah gfo e ik lrkne oisth ".msihcr ow a dnA alism. A  and Soci ancrihms nhtnaA  cinmoom mnoe orh ms evaiN dilihm anchisAnarhat nit a agnoecuo tt inpoo  trysaescen osla si tI ".  shtnat eh alttre were more zealoutahteht rof  remhtignl opry e ov ,ubsisttam  thtf thse ociale So reffid oht morfischarAnhtig mts stsiA ".nA ohcra entorndta smete oi;nw ,euhimiltat, have n  at leasno deraps neeb ee on, cerasgdie  eimaklbhtnire y havt we; busery e urerev or y fofm rep ucesnoitve , . , the Russians)h va eah dote dnatrnteInCol naio :ssergn e.i ( eW"echas Pl sainofft eh dtaci hZ rü itt ef lad husf o emos nehw—emitand on, satigani trohcsinAraa— n ctfaha tk ooe tho otlrevffa  dro came in eague beaiiltsL   tht S e co t deyalptcaer ehnscouns y slouci.eW g mannto eacry Aionahistnarc hw d ere eht dlO"ay andvd,cean" N" p o lotici!s "ah Unionist cry of  ihtsancrsiA erh or ties path symhT" taht etats ohe tofs odthmee httaa w  tr"ya—dn politicaould-be n dih tono ld—!e dtolaecitese at wed  avochisAnarhWlist .ti e euqlyntcereea lhe ta fo redap wen"  that since then ti l s aeedsrh va eenbeor, ti s all ,ererom ro ssel rk as woe prt thusni esit ih gfosoea rstthy whn ereht ,yal a si tional Socialist  ht eentxI tnreanmeti. ly 1In6 89neseom ttnem si  a dngaci ertm ro theame,st gionitcaer siht yalp ho wenom wnd aen .t iFanll m vomeneng classle workieht ohw semorof its ec bngdaouer row sti luohs ,krsdeund hy wndtasdo sunakrre fowo wis whatchll w aP e,sirurB less as, ZndicürInh  t ehr selotuoisn arrived at by th s  iIt. onndLon  esoht taht llewion e UnTradand sti m eeerssoCgn ateg, es  ass el s deht oht  dnataht attend twho may  toCgnerih srgae n meo whe argiwahT .em ena now dwar in Russia and gnt ehrih reio c riza Cste av hsmaloP ni niaga dnth An wihismnarcro eonm moomnic   rehssuRb deto yphemisasd sed anonatlb yst ,na dlutionisian revo maharbA ,etagele n d carime Ahe tby gueer feisnaR sulf aimsean—h Cah ld yocvnniect eh youngest even t tahednuna ric yumrcansts cearAn msihcsi nato b tu wordher  rea fora ;noitcm eht dnnehoe or mhe tst d the fo than ha fht eomnuedsro liia mo strndeoc S  lraxraMemevC—tnck Ederi Fre and tiltsil  .s hT gnle haecPlf  ookboe erussa lliw ffon g.raM ronanilevA x l spiona. Ele ydomna doi nnrtaniet roygd f un  rorctea elohrow a dlalp ialists of the wvelotuoianyrS co

Green Street Green, Orpington, Kent.  August, 1895.

ANARCHISM AND SOCIALISM

d celaylW roaler' Cokersssesngre .decrofn ranA ehT   wtsischicyn cho drt  oht enArahcists should be enretoita langnoCssre wesh itgare  Con themake to ehR fot es srgse ceytht ha tl,aldewolla eb tonna t be tauess" musa dnf rohg tnoecmo, vetiab "rdsues dlesnsselna , ERPFACE. The work ofm  yrfeidnG oegr