Full report of the CPOV, Wikipedia - Institute of Network Cultures

Starlight

Description

Full report of the CPOV, Wikipedia - Institute of Network Cultures

Informations

• Publié par: uhegojok
• Nombre de lectures: 180
• Langue: English
• Poids de l'ouvrage: 1 Mo

Extrait

Inhoudelijk en financiële verantwoording Wikipedia, Critical Point of View, maart 2010

Instituut voor Netwerkcultuur Rhijnspoorplein 1, 1091 GC Amsterdam 020-5951866 / htto://networkcultures.org

 

2 / 38

Inhoudsopgave

1 WIKIPEDIA, CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW ....................................................................4........... 1.1  B ELANGRIJKSTE OPGELEVERDE RESULTATEN   .................................................4....................... 1.2 HTTP :// RESLUUTROCKENWT . ORG / CPOV   ................................................................................5 2 BLOGPOSTS.   .........................................................................................................................6 V ERSLAG W IKIPEDIA CONFERENTIE DOOR STUDENTEN VAN DE U NIVERSITEIT VAN U TRECHT   ..........6 I NTRODUCTION BY G EERT L OVINK   14........................................................................................... L ICHTY :  T HIS P TIONENTARES M IGHT G ET M E K ILLED   ................................................1...4............. K ILLDALL :  W IKIPEDIA A RT :  F IFTEEN H OURS OF M AGIC   ..............................................................15 H OFMANN :  W IKIPEDIA B ETWEEN E MANCIPATION AND S ELF -R EGULATION   ..............................61..... J OSEPH R EAGLE :  W IKIPEDIA AND E NCYCLOPEDIC A NXIETY   71....................................................... D AN OʼS ULLIVAN :  A N E NCYCLOPEDIA FOR THE T IMES :  T HOUGHTS ON W IKIPEDIA FROM A H SIOTIRACL P ERSPECTIVE   18........................................................................................................................ K INNAIGOZTARA :  T HE P ROCESS IS R ADICAL THE C ONTENT IS N OT   ........................................19.... F ITLIETAMIG :  M ANAGING S CARCE R ESOURCES IN W IKIPEDIA   ............................2........................0 M IKKONEN :  T HE K OSOVO W AR C ONTINUING ON W IKIPEDIA :  T OO M ANY T RUTHS FOR O NE W IKI   .21 S HAPIRO :  W IKIPEDIA P ROVIDES I NTELLIGENCE BUT N OT I NTELLIGENCE ABOUT S TUPIDITY   ..........22 V ARGHESE M ATHEWS :  C LUSTERING THE C ONTRIBUTORS TO A W IKIPEDIA P AGE   ......................23.. V AN DER V ELDEN :  W HEN K NOWLEDGES M EET :  D ATABASE D ESIGN AND THE P ERFORMANCE OF K NOWLEDGE   .................................................................23......................................................... F USTER M ORELL :  T HE R OLE OF THE W IKIMEDIA F OUNDATION   .................................................52.. S TUART G EIGER :  W HAT IS IN C ONTROL OF W IKIPEDIA ?   ...............................................26............. Oʼ  N EIL :  W IKIPEDIA IS S OVEREIGN ,  M ACHO O N -L INE H ABITUS F UELED BY C HARISMA   ............28.... W ELTEVREDE AND B ORRA ON VISUALISING CONTROVERSY AND W IKIPEDIA STRUCTURES   ............28 L IANG :  D E -C LASSIFY AND U N -A UTHORIZE   ........................................................29........................ G RIEVINK :  A  R EAL C HALLENGE W OULD B E TO T HINK OF W IKIMEDIA C OMMONS A S A G OAL IN I TSELF   ................30................................................................................................................... C RAMER :  O BJECTIVISM AND THE F ICTIONS OF C OLLABORATIVE M EDIA   32...................................... #CP O V ON THE T WITTER B ACKCHANNEL   ............................................................................33..... F ULL VIDEO REPORT OF CPOV   ............................................................................................33... A RCHIVE TWEETS OF THE EVENT IN A MSTERDAM   ................................................33...................... P ICTURES   ..............................................................................................................................33 3 BEGROTING VERSUS WERKELIJK GEMAAKTE KOSTEN   ............5............3......................

 

3 / 38