Gender and respiratory factors associated with dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
7 pages
English

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Gender and respiratory factors associated with dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

-

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
7 pages
English
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

Rationale We had shown that COPD women expressed more dyspnea than men for the same degree of airway obstruction. Objectives Evaluate gender differences in respiratory factors associated with dyspnea in COPD patients. Methods In a FEV 1 % matched population of 100 men and women with COPD we measured: age, MMRC, FEV 1 , FVC, TLC, IC/TLC, PaO 2 , PaCO 2 , D LCO , P imax , P 0.1 , Ti/Ttot, BMI, ffmi, 6MWD and VAS scale before and after the test, the Charlson score and the SGRQ. We estimated the association between these parameters and MMRC scores. Multivariate analysis determined the independent strength of those associations. Results MMRC correlated with: BMI (men:-0.29, p = 0.04; women:-0.28, p = 0.05), ffmi (men:-0.39, p = 0.01), FEV 1 % (men:-0.64, p < 0.001; women:-0.29, p = 0.04), FVC % (men:-0.45, p = 0.001; women:-0.33, p = 0.02), IC/TLC (men:-0.52, p < 0.001; women: -0.27, p = 0.05), PaO 2 (men:-0.59, p < 0.001), PaCO 2 (men:0.27, p = 0.05), D LCO (men:-0.54, p < 0.001), P 0.1 /P imax (men:0.46, p = 0.002; women:0.47, p = 0.005), dyspnea measured with the Visual Analog Scale before (men:0.37, p = 0.04; women:0.52, p = 0.004) and after 6MWD (men:0.52, p = 0.002; women:0.48, p = 0.004) and SGRQ total (men:0.50, p < 0.001; women:0.59, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that P 0.1 /P imax in women (r 2 = 0.30) and BMI, DL CO , PaO 2 and P 0.1 /P imax in men (r 2 = 0.81) were the strongest predictors of MMRC scores. Conclusion In mild to severe COPD patients attending a pulmonary clinic, P 0.1 /P imax was the unique predictor of MMRC scores only in women. Respiratory factors explain most of the variations of MMRC scores in men but not in women. Factors other than the respiratory ones should be included in the evaluation of dyspnea in women with COPD.

Informations

Publié par
Publié le 01 janvier 2007
Nombre de lectures 7
Langue English

Extrait

BioMed CentralRespiratory Research
Open AccessResearch
Gender and respiratory factors associated with dyspnea in chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease
1 1 1Juan P de Torres* , Ciro Casanova , Angela Montejo de Garcini ,
1 2Armando Aguirre-Jaime and Bartolome R Celli
1 2Address: Respiratory Research Unit, Hospital Nuestra Sra de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain and Pulmonary and Critical Care Division. Caritas-St.
Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, USA
Email: Juan P de Torres* - jupa65@hotmail.com; Ciro Casanova - ccasanova@canarias.org; Angela Montejo de
Garcini - amontejo@hotmail.com; Armando Aguirre-Jaime - aaguirre@canarias.org; Bartolome R Celli - bcelli@copdnet.org
* Corresponding author
Published: 6 March 2007 Received: 14 December 2006
Accepted: 6 March 2007
Respiratory Research 2007, 8:18 doi:10.1186/1465-9921-8-18
This article is available from: http://respiratory-research.com/content/8/1/18
© 2007 de Torres et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Rationale: We had shown that COPD women expressed more dyspnea than men for the same
degree of airway obstruction.
Objectives: Evaluate gender differences in respiratory factors associated with dyspnea in COPD
patients.
Methods: In a FEV % matched population of 100 men and women with COPD we measured: age,1
MMRC, FEV , FVC, TLC, IC/TLC, PaO , PaCO , D , P , P , Ti/Ttot, BMI, ffmi, 6MWD and1 2 2 LCO imax 0.1
VAS scale before and after the test, the Charlson score and the SGRQ. We estimated the
association between these parameters and MMRC scores. Multivariate analysis determined the
independent strength of those associations.
Results: MMRC correlated with: BMI (men:-0.29, p = 0.04; women:-0.28, p = 0.05), ffmi (men:-
0.39, p = 0.01), FEV % (men:-0.64, p < 0.001; women:-0.29, p = 0.04), FVC % (men:-0.45, p = 0.001;1
women:-0.33, p = 0.02), IC/TLC (men:-0.52, p < 0.001; women: -0.27, p = 0.05), PaO (men:-0.59,2
p < 0.001), PaCO (men:0.27, p = 0.05), D (men:-0.54, p < 0.001), P /P (men:0.46, p = 0.002;2 LCO 0.1 imax
women:0.47, p = 0.005), dyspnea measured with the Visual Analog Scale before (men:0.37, p = 0.04;:0.52, p = 0.004) and after 6MWD (men:0.52, p = 0.002; women:0.48, p = 0.004) and SGRQ
total (men:0.50, p < 0.001; women:0.59, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that P /P in0.1 imax
2 2 women (r = 0.30) and BMI, DL , PaO and P /P in men (r = 0.81) were the strongestCO 2 0.1 imax
predictors of MMRC scores.
Conclusion: In mild to severe COPD patients attending a pulmonary clinic, P /P was the0.1 imax
unique predictor of MMRC scores only in women. Respiratory factors explain most of the
variations of MMRC scores in men but not in women. Factors other than the respiratory ones
should be included in the evaluation of dyspnea in women with COPD.
Page 1 of 7
(page number not for citation purposes)Respiratory Research 2007, 8:18 http://respiratory-research.com/content/8/1/18
approved the study and all patients signed the informedBackground
The influence of gender on the expression of chronic consent.
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has received lim-
ited attention [1-3]. We evaluated the following parameters in the study sam-
ple: age, BMI (weight in kilograms divided by height in
2Dyspnea has been defined as the subjective experience of meters ), ffmi was determined using the bioelectrical
breathing discomfort consisting in qualitatively distinct impedance Bodystat (Isle of Man, British Isles) and divid-
sensations that vary in intensity and is derived from inter- ing the free fat mass weight in kilograms by height in
2actions among multiples physiological, psychological, meters , pulmonary function tests (FEV , FVC, TLC, IC/1
social and environmental factors [4]. It is the most impor- TLC, FRC, D ), resting arterial blood gases (PaO ,LCO 2
tant symptom of COPD patients and the main determi- PaCO ), dyspnea by the Modified Medical Research2
nant of their Quality of Life (QoL) [5]. Council scale (MMRC) [9] and by the Visual Analog Scale
(VAS) [10] immediately before and after the 6-minute
In the United States, in the year 2000, more women died walk distance (6MWD test) [11], maximal inspiratory
), breathing pattern (respiratory rate, Ti/from COPD than men [6]. We have recently shown in a pressures (Pimax
population of patients with COPD attending an outpa- Ttot, mouth occlusion pressure (P ), and presence of0.1
tient clinic, that for the same degree of airway obstruction, comorbidities by the Charlson scale [12].
women expressed more dyspnea than men at earlier stages
Pulmonary Function Testsof the disease [7].
Postbronchodilator FEV % of predicted, FVC % of pre-1
We therefore hypothesised that systematically studying dicted and FEV /FVC, IC, TLC, FRC, D values were1 LCO
and comparing different respiratory factors known to con- determined using the European Community for Steel and
tribute to dyspnea in a population of men and women Coal for Spain as reference values [13] and using a Jaegger
® with COPD could help us identify those factors associated 920 MasterLab Body Box. Inspiratory Capacity was meas-
with the symptom. Knowledge of these factors, could aid ured immediately before (the best of 3 manoeuvres) and
us in the development of tailored strategies aimed at after the 6MWD as previously described [14]. From the
decreasing dyspnea in the female COPD population lung volume measurements we also determined their IC/
where this important symptom presents at younger age TLC ratio.
and earlier stages of the disease. To pursue our goal we
called back our patients within the next year of the previ- P and breathing pattern measurementsimax
ous study [7]. At this new appointment we repeated the P was measured in sitting position after 15 minutes ofimax
same original evaluation and also measured other impor- rest from FRC using the technique and predictive values of
tant respiratory factors like the central drive (P ), the Black and Hyatt [15]. Breathing pattern was measured0.1
inspiratory and expiratory maximal pressures (P , also in sitting position after 15 minutes of rest and havingimax
P ), the inspiratory capacity to total lung capacity ratio carefully explained the manoeuvre to obtain and appro-emax
(IC/TLC) and the breathing pattern (respiratory rate and priate measurement. We measured respiratory rate, inspir-
Ti/Ttot). atory time (Ti), expiratory time (Te) and total breathing
time (Ttot).
Methods
This FEV % case series study, recruited men and post- Respiratory drive measurements1
menopausal women with COPD attending an outpatient The measurement of mouth occlusion pressure (P ) was0.1
clinic at Hospital Universitario Ntra Sra de Candelaria; a performed following the recommendations of Burki et al
tertiary public university hospital in Spain from January [16]. To better reflect the central respiratory output of our
2000 to December 2005. Patients with all degree of air- patients, we calculated the P /P index as we have pre-0.1 imax
flow severity were included if they had smoked ≥ 20 pack viously reported [17].
years and had a post-bronchodilator FEV /FVC of <0.71
Data processingafter 400 micrograms of inhaled albuterol. Patients were
excluded if they had a history of asthma, had a history of We describe each variable using mean ± SD or median
th th bronchiectasis, tuberculosis or other confounding dis- (25 percentile – 75 percentile) depending on their dis-
eases. We decided to include only those patients with air- tribution. A multivariate regression analysis with MMRC
way obstruction, therefore patients with GOLD stage 0 score as the dependent variable and those parameters that
were not included. The patients were clinically stable (no shown to be different between men and female as predic-
exacerbation for at least 2 months) at the time of the eval- tors of its changes was performed. We tested correlations
uation and were part of the BODE international multi- between the MMRC score and the study parameters by
center study [8]. The Ethical Committee of the Hospital non-parametric Spearman's rank or tau-b Kendall's linear
Page 2 of 7
(page number not for citation purposes)Respiratory Research 2007, 8:18 http://respiratory-research.com/content/8/1/18
correlations coefficients because the ordinal nature of smoking. Using the GOLD staging system [18], there were
MMRC scales. We then performed a multiple linear regres- the same number of men and women at each stage, dis-
sion analysis with MMRC score as the dependent variable tributed as follows: stage I: 25%, stage II: 52%, stage III:
and those factors and parameters that shown statistical 17% and stage IV: 3%.
significant correlation with it (Men: BMI, FEV %, IC/TLC,1
DLCO, PaO2 and P /P ; Women: BMI, FEV %, IC/ Table 1 shows the comparison of clinical and physiologi-0.1 imax 1
TLC and P /P ). A p value = 0.05 was considered sta- cal characteristics of the population. Compared with men,0.1 imax
tistical significant. The analysis was performed with the women were younger, smoked less, expressed more dysp-
® statistical package SPSS version 12, Chicago, IL, USA. nea as shown in figure 1, had the same BMI but lower
ffmi, a low

  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents