International Standard Problem 40 Aerosol Deposition and Resuspension. Final Comparison Report February 1999

Joint Research Centre

Sujets

• Sciences et techniques

Informations

• Publié par: JOINT-RESEARCH-CENTRE
• Nombre de lectures: 8
• Langue: English
• Poids de l'ouvrage: 12 Mo

Extrait

Alfredo de los Reyes Castelo
Joaquim Areia Capitão
Giovanni De Santi
RESUSPENSION
X~4 ·.'
/
*
Ρ M
o V
ι f
•
oc * I
LU
*■
. Final Comparison Report
4 , February 1999
V £L
JOINT OECD
RESEARCH Sr~Si
CENTRE
OCDE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
PARIS
NEA/CSNI/R(QQ)Ä EUR 18708 EN OECD
**• JOINT
AEN RESEARCH
***** OCDE ΝΕΑ CENTRE
PARIS EUROPEAN COMMISSION
NEA/CSNI/R(99)4 EUR 18708 EN
International Standard Problem 40
Aerosol Deposition and Resuspension
Final Comparison Report
February 1999
Alfredo de los Reyes Castelo
Joaquim Areia Capitão
Giovanni De Santi LEGAL NOTICE
Neither the European Commission nor any person
acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which
might be made of the following information.
EUR 18708 EN
European Communities, 1999
Printed in Italy AGENCE DE L'OCDE POUR L'ÉNERGIE NUCLÉAIRE
OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY
Paris, 1 February 1999
The International Standard Problem No. 40 exercise was devoted to deposition and
resuspension of aerosols in pipes. It was based on the results of STORM test SD­
11/SR­l 1, made available to the CSNI by JRC Ispra.
The exercise was divided in two parts : the deposition phase and the resuspension
phase. Fifteen organisations, submitting twenty­one sets of calculations using nine
computer codes, participated in the deposition part; they represented eight OECD
Member countries, the EC, and the Russian Federation. Eleven organisations,
submitting ten sets of calculations using six codes, participated in the resuspension
part; they represented eight OECD Member countries and the EC.
Three meetings were organised. A Preparatory Workshop was held on 17­18 March
1997. It was followed by a Preliminary Comparison & Interpretation Workshop on
23­24 March 1998 and a Final Comparison & Interpretation Workshop on 25­26 June
1998. All these meetings were hosted by JRC Ispra.
The Co­ordinator of the ISP­40 exercise was Mr. Joaquim Areia Capitão (JRC Ispra).
He was assisted by Dr. Alfredo de los Reyes Castelo (CSN, Spain). Both of them, and
other members of the STORM team, devoted considerable time and effort to the
preparation of the exercise and its specifications, the collection and the comparison of
the calculations performed by the participants, and the interpretation of the results. On
behalf of the CSNI and the ΝΕΑ, we express to all of them our sincere gratitude for
their fine spirit of co­operation, the high quality of their work, and their ability to meet
stringent deadlines.
We also thank very much JRC Ispra for their hospitality and their strong support in
favour of the exercise, and first of all for making the results of the STORM test
available for an ISP. Collaboration with the JRC has been most effective. Ispra staff
has constantly demonstrated high standards of competence and professionalism, and a
very fine spirit of international co­operation.
Jacques Royen
Deputy Head
Nuclear Safety Division
Le Seine St­Germain 12, Boulevard des lies 92130 Issy­les­Moulineaux France
Tel: (33­1)45 24 82 00 Fax: (33­Π 45 24 11 10 Telex: 640048 Electronic mail: <username>@oecd.org International Standard Problem no. 40 Final comparison report
PARTICIPANTS IN ISP-40
This report is based on the ISP­40 calculations performed by:
CEA/IPSN/DPEA
Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire ­ Département de Prévention et d'Etude
des Accidents ­France
A. Fallot
CEA/IPSN/DRS
Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire ­ Département de Recherches en Sécurité
­France
M. Missirlian
CIEMAT
Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas ­Spain
R. Añas, E. Hontañón
CSN
Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear ­ Spain
A. de los Reyes
ENEA
Ente per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e l'Ambiente ­ Italy
F. De Rosa, R. Mari
ENEL
Ente per l'Energia Elettrica S.p.A. ­ Italy
F. Paroni, L. Tagliaferri
ΕΤΗ
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule ­Switzerland
Η. Friess
GRS
Gesellschaft für Anlagen­ und Reaktorsicherheit ­ Germany
H.-G. Friederichs, Β. M. Schmitz
JAERI
Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute ­Japan
A. Hidaka, J. Sugimoto
JRC
Joint Research Center ­ European Union
J. Areia Capitão, C. Kroger, R. Monti International Standard Problem no. 40 Final comparison report
KINS
Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety - Korea
7.-5. Choi, H.-C. Kim
KURCHATOV
Russian Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute" - Russian Federation
P. Slavyagin
TAC
Toshiba Advanced System Corporation - Japan
T. Yoshino
TRACTEBEL
Tractebel Energy Engineering - Belgium
M. Auglaire, D. Magnus
U-Bochum
Ruhr-Universität Bochum - Germany
T. Steinrötter, N. Pohl, H. Unger
U-Karlsruhe
Universität Karlsruhe -Germany
H.-J. Schmid
U-Pisa
Università degli Studi di Pisa - Italy
S. Paci
VEIKI
Institut for Electric Power Research Co. - Hungary
G. Lajtha, L. G. Horváth
ISP-40 Secretary (OECD)
J. Royen International Standard Problem no. 40 Final comparison report
STORM SRll STAFF
Project Management
G. De Santi
Plant Operation
A. Krasenbrink, J. Bachler, U. Jung, E. Malgarini,
H. Pfitzner
Electrical Devices
H. Hülser, G. Barberi, G. Lanappe
Instrumentation
R. Hummel, R. Colombo, N. Röhrig, R. Männle, M. Sculati
Data Acquisition System
F. Bossi
Control System
G. Lanappe
Post-Test Analysis
P. Dilara, A. B opp
Data Analysis
J. Areia Capitão, A. de los Reyes, R. Monti
Design Office
F. Peters, A Renoldi
Administrative Support
H. Petruccioli, E. Occhetta
111 International Standard Problem no. 40 Final comparison report
iv