Radical Mainstream

Colin Perry

Description

Radical Mainstream examines independent film and video cultures in Britain from the mid-1970s to the late 1980s in the context of struggles against capitalism, patriarchy, racism, colonialism and homophobia, examining relations between counterpublics and social change. The book considers this period in order to examine the capacity for radical discourse to affect dominant cultural media forms, arguing that independent film- and video-makers helped transform television into a vital site of counterpublic discourse.

The end of the twentieth century saw the development of new social models of film and video production and exhibition alongside the formation of new alliances to campaign for changes to social practice, policy and legislature. Radical Mainstream explores the interrelation between public debate, institutions and individuals, arguing that independent film and video in Britain at this time – including activist documentary, currents of counter-cinema, avant-garde film and video art – were largely concerned with creating and circulating counterpublic discourses. The book traces the diversity of the influences on independent film and video, from socialist and liberation movements to popular radical histories and psychoanalytic and Marxist film theory. The account provides a historic backdrop to contemporary documentary and moving image work, and illuminates the heritage of critical thinking within such practices.

 

Introduction

1. Persuasion, pleasure, counterpublics

2. Counter-history in British independent film and video

3. The Independent Filmmakers’ Association (1974–1990)

4. Counter-television: Marc Karlin’s For Memory 

5. Bodies, Voices and Counterpublics: Stuart Marshall’s Bright Eyes 

Conclusion 

Sujets

• Histoire du cinéma
• Histoire du cinéma
• Histoire du cinéma
• Película fotográfica
• Video
• Television
• Art
• Avant-garde
• Film
• Cinéma
• Cinema

Informations

• Publié par: Intellect Books
• Date de parution: 17 juillet 2020
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9781789381948
• Langue: English

Extrait

First published in the UK in 2020 by Intellect, The Mill, Parnall Road, Fishponds, Bristol, BS16 3JG, UK
First published in the USA in 2020 by Intellect, The University of Chicago Press, 1427 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Copyright © 2020 Intellect Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written permission.
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Copy editor: MPS Technologies
Cover designer: Aleksandra Szumlas
Production manager: Emma Berrill
Typesetting: Contentra Technologies
Print ISBN 978-1-78938-192-4
ePDF ISBN 978-1-78938-193-1
ePUB ISBN 978-1-78938-194-8
Printed and bound by TJ International, UK.
To find out about all our publications, please visit www.intellectbooks.com .
There, you can subscribe to our e-newsletter, browse or download our current catalogue, and buy any titles that are in print.
This is a peer-reviewed publication.
Contents
Acknowledgements
Introduction
1. Persuasion, Pleasure, Counterpublics
Experience and Counterpublics
Whatever Happened to Reality?
Rhetoric, Persuasion and Pedagogy
Desire and Pleasure
2. Counter-History in British Independent Film and Video
Problems with the Past: On Radical Historiography
Diggers, Levellers and Bertolt Brecht
Work and Welfare: The Women’s Movement in Britain
National Pasts, Heritage, Ethnicities and Television
3. The Independent Filmmakers’ Association (1974–90)
Whose Public? The IFA and the Annan Committee
Reading Counterpublics: The IFA Newsletter and Other Publications
Forming New Publics for Independent Film and Video
Collective Bodies and Reading Publics
4. Counter-Television: Marc Karlin’s For Memory
The Image in Crisis: Testimonies and Witnesses
Images Archived: Holocaust and the Strange Museum
Images, Bodies, Communities
Image-Publics and Counter-Television
5. Bodies, Voices and Counterpublics: Stuart Marshall’s Bright Eyes
Bodies as Images
Moving Images: AIDS on Television in Britain
The Witness’s Voice
Sound and Voice
Signifying Practice and Counter-Television
Conclusion
References
Index
Acknowledgements
There are too many people to adequately thank for their support and insights in the writing of this book. Both Stuart Marshall and Marc Karlin died in the 1990s, so my research into their work has relied on their films, videos, writings and a series of informal interviews that I have conducted with their friends and colleagues. Interviewees – or rather, those who I have had rambling and productive conversations with – include: Holly Aylett, the co-ordinator of the Marc Karlin archive; Neil Bartlett, who knew Marshall and appeared in his video Pedagogue (1988); Simon Blanchard, who oversaw the activities of the Independent Filmmakers’ Association (IFA) in the 1980s; Jonathan Bloom (previously Collinson), the cinematographer who filmed a number of Marc Karlin’s projects; Anne Cottringer, the cinematographer who filmed Bright Eyes , among other independent films; the video artist Dave Critchley who knew Marshall as a colleague and friend; independent film-maker Jill Daniels; Barbara Evans, a film-maker involved in the London Women’s Film Group; Rebecca Dobbs, a founder member of Maya Vision, the company which produced a number of Marshall’s television works; Paul Marris, who was a significant presence in independent film groups such as the IFA, the Other Cinema, Faction Films and Trade Films; Laura Mulvey, the film-maker and theorist who was involved in the IFA from its early meetings in the mid-1970s; Sheila Rowbotham, the socialist-feminist historian who was at the forefront of the Women’s Liberation Movement in the 1970s, and who was a close friend of Karlin; Jeffrey Weeks, the historian, activist and theorist of sexuality; Cate Elwes who knew Marshall as a student and friend; David Curtis, Steven Ball and Duncan White at the British Artists’ Film and Video Collection; and Steve Presence from the Radical Film Network. For feedback on drafts, and fruitful discussions at screenings and conferences, I would also like to thank James Swinson, Lucy Reynolds, Sylvia Harvey, Pratap Rughani, Claire Holdsworth, Alison Green, Erika Balsom, Nick Helm-Grovas, Sue Clayton, Laura Mulvey, Cate Elwes, Janet McCabe, Pooja Rangan, Benjamin Cook, Conal McStravick and Dan Kidner. Thanks also to all of my wonderful undergraduate and postgraduate students at Central Saint Martins, University of Westminster and Arts University Bournemouth.
Introduction
What happens when radical cultures gain access to the mass media? This book addresses this question through an analysis of the relations between radical independent film and video practices in Britain and public service television from the mid-1970s to the late-1980s. This enquiry is urgent today because of the ongoing need for engagement, resistance and organization against the consolidation forces of the Right. If there is a nostalgic glow still emanating from this earlier era of widespread socialist activity, we should not be deluded that the past is a sealed box. Instead, by looking back at the past we can release its energies, rediscover its organizational logic and reignite its persuasive powers for our own urgent present moment. During the 1970s and 1980s, film-makers, video activists, artists and theorists from the fragmented Left fought for access to British television, which was partly achieved with the launch of Channel 4 in 1982. While this arena had been largely closed to the voices of dissent that emerged over the post-war period and the 1960s, by the early 1970s, television had become a site of struggle around social and political movements rooted in Marxism, the Women’s Liberation Movement, anti-racism, Gay Liberation and others. In fighting to gain access to the airwaves, film-makers of the fractured Left joined together to change governmental attitudes, legislation and institutional practices.
By the 1990s, television was certainly more open and diverse, more receptive to socialist, women, queer and black voices. But the period covered in this study also ends in a sense of gloom, with the apparent exhaustion of radical Left energies, where every oppositional impulse seemed to be absorbed or pre-absorbed by capitalism. 1 It is a crisis that still haunts us, notably with the corporate media’s hold over the ‘networked society’ (Castells 2010) of social and online media. But the hegemonic form of neoliberalism has also recently and spectacularly collapsed – giving birth to terrible monsters from Trump to Brexit, as well as the thrilling possibilities of a new populist socialist politics (Fraser 2019; Mouffe 2018). Our present era has returned to a maelstrom of energies not felt for several decades. It is my contention that the vitality of both these periods is contained within the rich eddies and flows of discourse, organization and activism, as well as the intersections between experimental aesthetics and political content. Such eras open up a flush of hope, where despite serious disagreements between Left factions, moments of cooperation can produce real effects. I argue in this book that independent film and video can be considered a signal form of such organization: a set of counterpublics : not a single movement, but a set of ad hoc alliances that come together to reshape social and political ideals more widely.
In examining the area in terms of diverse publics, I also wish to overcome two of the main problems with many existing accounts of independent film and video in Britain during this period. First, films and videos from this period are often analysed as separate to the sociopolitical movements that they emerged from or jostled with. Partly, this lacuna is an effect of the dominant film theories of the 1970s, which understood films as texts that have causal effects on viewers. That is to say, the power of film or cinema was understood to emanate from the film text and the cinematic encounter itself, not from the wider network of debates these were part of (see Chapter 1). Subsequent theories of affect in film studies since the 1990s have proved rich analysis of specific films; but they have not generally engaged with their social force, or how and where films or videos were originally received by audiences. Films and videos that were originally funded or commissioned for television broadcast, such as Bright Eyes (1984, Stuart Marshall), Handsworth Songs (1986, Black Audio Film Collective) or For Memory (1986, Marc Karlin), are often discussed as works of cinema, art or activism, rather than situated within the media ecologies of the time. 2 Another reason is that researchers and commentators today often encounter these independent films and videos in very different contexts, including international film festivals, art exhibitions and biennials. Canonical works are therefore often understood in terms of contemporary cinephile or art debates, such as the ‘essay film’, 3 rather than in terms of their original rootedness in specific social and political conditions.
A more recent turn towards contextual studies of distribution and exhibition since the late 1990s has produced a wealth of empirical data, memories and anecdotes, on independent film and video histories. These studies have been vital for my own research. Generally, however, the turn to contextual analysis has not been accompanied by a cogent theoretical analysis: for all their detailed richness, these texts frequently do not provide a framework for understanding the interplay of discourses, networks, aesthetics and sociopolitical contexts. This is certainly not to dismiss vital accounts such as Margaret Dickinson’s superbly informative Rogue Reels and Julia Knight and Peter Thomas’s thoroughly researched Reaching Audiences (Dickinson 1999;