La lecture à portée de main
Vous pourrez modifier la taille du texte de cet ouvrage
Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement
Je m'inscrisDécouvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement
Je m'inscrisVous pourrez modifier la taille du texte de cet ouvrage
Description
Sujets
Informations
Publié par | Everest Media LLC |
Date de parution | 22 mars 2022 |
Nombre de lectures | 4 |
EAN13 | 9781669357230 |
Langue | English |
Poids de l'ouvrage | 1 Mo |
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,0150€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
Insights on Michael Schur's How to Be Perfect
Contents Insights from Chapter 1 Insights from Chapter 2 Insights from Chapter 3
Insights from Chapter 1
#1
We should not punch our friends in the face for no reason, but it can be hard to decision what to do in such an obvious situation. We should consider why it’s bad to punch our friends in the face for no reason, and that might help us make decisions about what to do in less morally obvious situations.
#2
The first theory we’re going to discuss is called virtue ethics. It defines good people as those who have certain qualities that they’ve cultivated and honed over time. But we immediately wonder if there is a single way to define a good person.
#3
Aristotle’s most important work is the Nicomachean Ethics, which defines what makes a person good.
#4
Aristotle’s ultimate goal for humans is happiness. He claims that happiness is the thing we want to be, just… to be it. It has no aim other than itself. It’s the top dog on the list of things we desire.
#5
The virtues of a person are the aspects of their makeup that we admire or associate with goodness. The virtues of a knife are those qualities that make it good at being a knife, and the virtues of a horse are the horse’s inherent qualities that make it good at galloping and other horsey stuff.
#6
We all have the potential to become virtuous, but not all of us acQUIRE it. We all have a potential to become virtuous, but not all of us acQUIRE it.
#7
We must practice all of the virtues, and develop a habit of doing so, in order to flourish. We were not born with aptitudes for these things, but with the ability to develop them through habituation.
#8
The ancient Greeks were obsessed with the role of teachers in re shaping people from unformed little goobers into the civic-minded, flourishing people they wanted them to be.
#9
The golden mean is the most important cog in Aristotle’s ethical machine. It’s also, in my opinion, the most beautiful. And the most annoying.
#10
The search for virtue helps us understand what we like and don’t like about people. We can only find these golden means by practicing the art of finding them, by trying and failing, and by evaluating our successes and failures.
#11
Virtue ethics helps us understand why certain actions are good or bad, and how we can improve our behavior. It gives us a clear picture of how we’re doing, how we can get better, and what we should avoid.
#12
The virtue ethics of Aristotle are great for helping us extract the good bits of our personalities, even if we were raised with a strong predilection to do what we’re told.
#13
The search for golden means is cumulative - the closer we get to one, the more it can help us in our search for others. We’ll understand and adapt to any new situation, able to see and decipher the foundational code of human existence.
#14
When we only consider religious sins as the worst things we can do, we end up justifying horrible atrocities. If we elevate cruelty to the top of the worst crimes we can commit list, we can no longer find any loopholes.
#15
We have covered a lot of ground already! We understand that we shouldn’t punch our friend in the face for no reason, and we understand why that is. We also understand that there are times when our choices are not between (a) punch someone in the face or (b) don’t punch someone in the face, but instead between (a) punch someone in the face or (b) punch someone else in the stomach.
#16
The Trolley Problem is an experiment that asks you to respond to the question, If you were faced with the choice of switching a trolley that was about to kill five people, or one person, whom would you switch it off of. Most people say they would save the five construction workers, reflexively.
#17
The Trolley Problem is a series of booby traps that await us if we even slightly modify the original scenario. For example, we might not be the driver, but just an innocent observer standing next to the tracks where the track-switching lever is located.
#18
The Trolley Problem is so compelling because our answers to the simple question Is it okay to do this. vary widely with each different version, even though the basic act and its end result is always the same.
#19
The second Western school of philosophy is utarianism, which was developed by British thinkers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Bentham had many admirable qualities, but he was also… let’s say, eccentric.
#20
Utilitarianism is a branch of consequentialism, which is the belief that the best action is the one that results in the most good and least bad consequences.
#21
The greatest happiness principle states that if you’re acting only for yourself, go ahead and seek pleasures however you want. But if you’re acting publicly, aim to spread as much pleasure around as you can.