Secret Manoeuvres in the Dark

Eveline Lubbers

Description

*Shortlisted for the Bread and Roses Prize, 2013*



The exposure of undercover policeman Mark Kennedy in the eco-activist movement revealed how the state monitors and undermines political activism. This book shows the other grave threat to our political freedoms - undercover activities by corporations.



Secret Manoeuvres in the Dark documents how corporations are halting legitimate action and investigation by activists. Using exclusive access to previously confidential sources, Eveline Lubbers shows how companies such as Nestlé, Shell and McDonalds use covert methods to evade accountability. She argues that corporate intelligence gathering has shifted from being reactive to pro-active, with important implications for democracy itself.



Secret Manoeuvres in the Dark will be vital reading for activists, investigative and citizen journalists, and all who care about freedom and democracy in the 21st century.

Preface. Corporate spying today

1. The Waste Paper man, introduction

2. Covert Corporate Strategy in the Past

3. Rafael Pagan, Nestlé and Shell, case study

4. McSpy, case study

5. Cybersurveillance, case study

6. Hakluyt and the Jobbing Spy, case study

7. The Threat Response Spy Files, case study

8. Secrecy, Research and Resistance, conclusions

Notes

Appendix 1. Manfred Schlickenrieder Documents

Appendix 2. Evelyn le Chêne Documents

Bibliography and References

Index

Sujets

• Social Science
• Droit et juridique
• Corporate crime
• Criminology

Informations

• Publié par: Pluto Press
• Date de parution: 14 juin 2012
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9781849646413
• Langue: English
• Poids de l'ouvrage: 1 Mo

Extrait

Secret Manoeuvres in the Dark

This book is a joint project of
SpinWatch in the UK
www.spinwatch.org

and
Buro Jansen & Janssen in the Netherlands
www.burojansen.nl


First published 2012 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA
www.plutobooks.com
Distributed in the United States of America exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan, a division of St. Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010
Copyright © Eveline Lubbers 2012
The right of Eveline Lubbers to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978 0 7453 3186 7 Hardback ISBN 978 0 7453 3185 0 Paperback ISBN 978 1 8496 4640 6 PDF eBook ISBN 978 1 8496 4642 0 Kindle eBook ISBN 978 1 8496 4641 3 EPUB eBook
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data applied for
This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental standards of the country of origin.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Designed and produced for Pluto Press by Chase Publishing Services Ltd Typeset from disk by Stanford DTP Services, Northampton, England Simultaneously printed digitally by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham, UK and Edwards Bros in the United States of America
For Felipe Rodriquez
Thanks

Geert Lovink for guiding me through the wilderness, Buro Jansen & Janssen for all those years, David Miller and Will Dinan Dienke Hondius, Monique Verrijcke, Sheila O’Donnell, Andy Rowell, Maja van der Velden, Rob Dover, Rick van Amersfoort and all the other friends who knew that I was going to get there. The ladies’ gym for their support and courage,

and of course, most of all, to Marq, my love, and Castor, Franka and Renzo, my kids, for making this possible and still loving me, and everybody at Omega and Villa Spijker for taking so much weight off my shoulders.
Contents



Preface: Corporate Spying Today
1. Introduction: The Waste Paper Man
2. Covert Corporate Strategy in the Past
3. Rafael Pagan, Nestlé and Shell: Case Study
4. McSpy: Case Study
5. Cybersurveillance and Online Covert Strategy: Case Study
6. Hakluyt and the Jobbing Spy: Case Study
7. The Threat Response Spy Files: Case Study
8. Conclusion: Secrecy, Research and Resistance
Appendix 1: Manfred Schlickenrieder Documents
Appendix 2: Evelyn le Chêne Documents
Notes
Bibliography and References
Index
Preface
Corporate Spying Today

The exposure of Mark Kennedy as an infiltrator of activist groups made headlines in early 2011. Confronted by friends and fellow campaigners in the UK, Kennedy admitted to having been a spy for seven years. Using the name Mark Stone, he had embedded himself in the environmental movement, while widening his scope to protests against the summits of world leaders, anti-fascism campaigning and animal rights advocacy. His nickname was ‘Flash’ because of the money he had available. He offered transport to set up climate camps and volunteered his climbing skills to add spectacular effects to, for instance, the occupation of power plants.
The Mark Kennedy case could have been a chapter in this book. It is an exemplary case, with the infiltrator providing transport and money, and sometimes crossing the thin line between facilitator and agent provocateur. It is an extraordinary case, not only for the span of the operation, the many years, and the amount of countries in Europe. The coverage in the press was huge, and as a result of public pressure, half a dozen official reviews are now under way.
The fact that he was a police spy would not have made a difference. On the contrary, the Kennedy case reveals the increasingly blurring boundaries between public and private policing and puts the grey area of corporate intelligence in the spotlight. The set of secret units Kennedy worked for was founded explicitly to satisfy the needs of companies targeted by activists. What is more, the companies involved – such as electricity suppliers and airline companies – also hire former police and intelligence staff to deal with security issues.
The fact that none of the official reviews into the Kennedy case investigates the aspects of corporate spying underlines the urgent need for a book putting the spotlight on similar secret manoeuvres in the dark.
BLURRING BOUNDARIES
The exposure of Mark Kennedy put the spotlight on secret police units making a profit from selling information, and showed that the police cooperate with private security services founded by former intelligence staff with long track records in monitoring activist groups.
As an undercover agent, Kennedy reported to a secret unit founded to deal with ‘domestic extremism’ run by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Its organization reflects the culture of secretiveness and the aversion to any public scrutiny of intelligence work. The unit Kennedy worked for was one of three. His was the National Public Order Intelligence Unit, created in 1999. The other two ACPO branches are the National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit, set up in 2004, which advises thousands of companies on how to manage political campaigns, and the National Domestic Extremism Team, added in 2005, which pools intelligence gathered by investigations into protesters across the country. The units report to ACPO’s Terrorism and Allied Matters Committee. Although it is responsible for some of the more sensitive national operations, ACPO is not a public body of any sort. 1 It is a limited company, sharing its data with clients such as energy companies running power plants and airline companies involved in the expansion of airports and flights. In its 2008 ‘statement of purpose’, ACPO vowed ‘to develop our business activities to ensure that the ACPO brand name is recognized globally as a mark of excellence in policing’ (ACPO, 2008). A Daily Mail investigation into its activities and assets revealed that ACPO was selling information from the Police National Computer for up to £70 – even though it pays just 60p to access those details. It offers, among other services, so-called police certificates that reveal whether someone has a criminal record – a service over which it has a monopoly. For a ‘not-for profit’, the company accounts show a significant annual surplus, still according to the Daily Mail , with £15.8 million in assets, including £9.2 million ‘cash at bank and in hand’ (Lewis, 2009). In a response, the organization defended their activities, claiming that ‘all funds to ACPO are employed in the interests of public safety and the police service’ (ACPO, 2009).
The national infrastructure for dealing with ‘domestic extremism’ was set up with the backing of the Home Office in 1997 in an attempt to combat animal rights activists. It started in Huntingdon, as a section of Special Branch, the Animal Rights National Index (ARNI). At the time, the Home Office was ‘getting really pressurized by big business – pharmaceuticals in particular, and the banks’ about the ‘extreme criminal behaviour of some people within the animal rights movement’, according to Superintendent Steve Pearl, head of National Extremism unit. Later, the units incorporated ARNI altogether (Evans, Lewis and Taylor, 2009; for more background, see Mobbs, 2009). Since the criminal activity associated with these groups has receded, the secret units have expanded their remit to incorporate campaign groups across the political spectrum engaged in peaceful direct action. Special Branch colluded with private investigators hired by McDonald’s to spy on activists in the 1990s, as Chapter 4 shows. More recently, according to Pearl, the focus shifted to the Climate Camp and Plane Stupid campaigns because environmental protesters had started ‘shutting down airports and coal-fired power stations’. A freedom of information request by the Liberal Democrats in 2009 revealed that the police and the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) exchanged information with E.ON over the Climate Camp demonstrations at Kingsnorth power station. According to correspondence between civil servants and security officials at the company (seen by the Guardian ), police intelligence and the Department’s strategies on protesters, including their names and whereabouts, were passed to E.ON. ‘David Howarth MP, who obtained the emails, said they suggested that BERR had attempted to politicise the police, using their intelligence to attempt to disrupt a peaceful protest. "It is as though BERR was treating the police as an extension of E.ON’s private security operation,"’ he said (Taylor and Lewis, 2009).
While some of the information gathered comes from police spies like Kennedy, the ACPO database also contains ‘information supplied by companies that hire private investigators to spy on protestors, sometimes by infiltration’, according to the national co-coordinator for domestic extremism, Anton Setchell (Evans, Lewis and Taylor, 2009).
For instance, Kennedy secretly taped the discussions of a group of people from all over the UK to take over the Radcliffe-on-Soar power station the next day, on Easter Monday 2009. Just before everybody went to sleep, a large police force surprised the group and arrested 114 people.
However, the energy giant E.ON, which runs the Radcliffe-on-Soar plant, also turned to private security firms. The energy giant claimed that it happened ‘on an "ad hoc" basis as its executives wanted to know when environmentalists were going to demonstrate at or invade its power stations and other premises’ (Lewis and Evans, 2011a).
One such firm was Vericola, which worked for several companies targeted by climate campaigners, such as Scottish Resources Group, Britain’s second biggest coal producer. Their