Richard Drake presents a new interpretation of Charles Austin Beard's life and work. The foremost American historian and a leading public intellectual in the first half of the twentieth century, Beard participated actively in the debates about American politics and foreign policy surrounding the two world wars. In a radical change of critical focus, Charles Austin Beard places the European dimension of Beard's thought at the center, correcting previous biographers' oversights and presenting a far more nuanced appreciation for Beard's life.Drake analyzes the stages of Beard's development as a historian and critic: his role as an intellectual leader in the Progressive movement, the support that he gave to the cause of American intervention in World War I, and his subsequent revisionist repudiation of Wilsonian ideals and embrace of non-interventionism in the lead-up to World War II. Charles Austin Beard shows that, as Americans tally the ruinous costs-both financial and moral-of nation-building and informal empire, the life and work of this prophet of history merit a thorough reexamination.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,7500€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
CHARES AUSTïN BEARD
CHARESAUSTïN BEARD
T HE RE T URN OF T HEMAST E R HI STORI AN OFAME RI CAN I MPE RI AL I SM
A rîghts reserved. Except or brîe quotatîons în a revîew, thîs book, or parts thereo, must not be reproduced în any orm wîthout permîssîon în wrîtîng rom the pubîsher. For înormatîon, address Corne Unîversîty Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, ïthaca, New York 14850. Vîsît our websîte at cornepress.corne.edu.
Fîrst pubîshed 2018 by Corne Unîversîty Press
Prînted în the Unîted States o Amerîca
îbrary o Congress Cataogîng-în-Pubîcatîon Data
Cover photo: Portraît o Chares A. Beard. Courtesy o the New York Pubîc îbrary.
In homae to Leonardo Brunî, who în the iteenth century observedthat the undamenta esson to be ound în the paes ohîstory concerns the eterna struge between the rîch and the poor.
Co n t e n t s
Preaceîx Acknowedmentsxv
ïntroductîon: The Beardîan ïnterpretatîon o Amerîcan Hîstory 1. Dîscoverîng the Economîc Taproot o ïmperîaîsm 2. Two Contrastîng Progressîve Vîews o the Great War 3. Becomîng a Revîsîonîst 4. Washîngton and Wa Street Workîng Together or War 5. ïsoatîonîsm versus ïnternatîonaîsm 6. A Wartîme Trîogy 7. Wagîng War or the Four Freedoms 8. Beard Fînds an Ay în Herbert Hoover 9. Attackîng “the Saînt” 10. Deendîng Beard ater the Fa 11. Beard’s Phîosophy o Hîstory and Amerîcan ïmperîaîsm Concusîon: The Sad Hîstorîan o the Pensîve Paîn
Notes269 Index307
1
7
27 49
73 96 118 142 165 185 210
234
257
P r e f a c e
ï began graduate work on Amerîcan hîstory în 1963 at a schoo where Chares Beard survîved on semînar readîng îsts maîny as an exampe o how not to thînk about the Ied. As an undergraduate, ï had readthe Constîtutîon o the Unîted StatesAn Economîc Interpretatîon o . ït had stayed în my mînd as a humany credîbe aternatîve to the ceebratory Amer-îcan pageant approach then typîca o hîstory textbooks and, în that era o bur-geonîng consensus about the country’s exceptîona îdeas and vîrtues, eadîng monographs as we. Wîth what Beard ater acknowedged were some overstatements, he îden-tîIed the economîc orces responsîbe or the Amerîcan poîtîca system at îts oundîng. At the same tîme, hîs book provîded a hîstorîca prîmer or under-standîng how Amerîcan poîtîcs contînued to work on one o îts many eves, as a natura conduît or the advancement o peope and înterests wîth the money to pay or the entîtements bestowed by Washîngton. Hîs thesîs had the enormous advantage o expaînîng hîstorîcay one o the most obvîousy true aspects o Amerîcan poîtîca îe, îts reîance on money. The system worked în the maîn as îts desîgners had întended, Beard argued, to create a country suîted as much as possîbe to the economîc needs o the busîness and andownîng casses. That the Founders were în many ways praîseworthy men o exceptîona brîîance and earnîng dîd not take away rom the thrust o hîs argument în the book about the natura încînatîon or them to ook out or theîr own înterests. He admîred them, not east or the orthrîghtness wîth whîch înThe Federaîstand other sources they reey acknowedged theîr eco-nomîc motîves în desîgnîng the Constîtutîon. ï kept wonderîng în graduate schoo why, despîte the arguments ï heard în semînars and ectures, Beard seemed to me to be rîght în hîs prîncîpa judg-ments. ïn hîs great book, he had caîmed ony to be advancîng an înterpreta-tîon and învîted hîstorîans to test ît. Books had appeared to reute aspects o hîs înterpretatîon, în uIment o Beard’s own expectatîons about the îkey course o research deveopments oowîng the pubîcatîon oAn Economîc Interpretatîon. Though crîtîcs ony partîay had succeeded în theîr attack agaînst