Where All Knowledge Is Derived Through Colour

Marcel Perrot

Description

The book comprises of some dialogues between Pierrot and the three empiricists, Locke, Berkeley and Hume, and as Pierrot discusses with them about the empiricism of colour, and he contrasts his own views on colour and experience with the three empiricists separately. Firstly, there are six dialogues between Pierrot and the empiricists about colour and empiricism. And secondly I have written some dialogues of Plato and Aristotle, and as Empedocles, Democritus and Epicurus have much to say on physics and metaphysics. And because Plato and Aristotle both advocate metaphysics, and Empedocles, Democritus and Epicurus, the three of them advocate physics, and they reject metaphysics. And furthermore, Empedocles, Democritus, and Epicurus, the three of them would like to differ with Aristotle on the physics of the world.

Sujets

• Philosophie et théologie
• Philosophy

Informations

• Publié par: Xlibris NZ
• Date de parution: 02 mars 2023
• Nombre de lectures: 0
• EAN13: 9781669880363
• Langue: English
• Poids de l'ouvrage: 3 Mo

Extrait

WHERE ALL KNOWLEDGE IS DERIVED THROUGH COLOUR
 
 
 
 
 
Marcel Perrot
 
Copyright © 2023 by Marcel Perrot.
 
ISBN:
Softcover
978-1-6698-8037-0

eBook
978-1-6698-8036-3
 
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.
 
Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Getty Images are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.
Certain stock imagery © Getty Images.
 
 
 
Rev. date: 02/22/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Xlibris
NZ TFN: 0800 008 756 (Toll Free inside the NZ)
NZ Local: 9-801 1905 ([phone] from outside New Zealand)
www.Xlibris.co.nz
839726
CONTENTS
Where All Knowledge Is Derived Through Colour
Where All Experience Is Derived Through Colour
Dialogue Between Plato and Empedocles
Dialogue Between Plato and Democritus
Dialogue Between Plato and Epicurus
A footnote to Plato
Dialogue Between Aristotle and Empedocles
Dialogue Between Aristotle and Democritus
Dialogue Between Aristotle and Epicurus
Footnote to Aristotle
Letters
Supplements, Section One
Supplements, Section Two
Supplements, Section Three
WHERE ALL KNOWLEDGE IS DERIVED THROUGH COLOUR
DIALOGUE BETWEEN LOCKE AND PIERROT
Note, Locke has set the foundation of all knowledge through an a posteriori method. And I have contrasted a colourist method, and I want to know whether human understanding can be a colourist way and forensic. I want to know whether the colourist method can be through the a posteriori way of our world. And so Locke teaches that all knowledge is through the a posteriori, and in contrast I teach a colourist method and way for life.
Locke, all things of this earth are perceived and learnt in an a posteriori way and method,
And this differs to the a priori of other worlds, as they are a priori through metaphysics,
Pierrot, yeah, all things of this earth are learnt through colour, and where colour is a posteriori,
Locke, and all knowledge is not innate, and as knowledge is learnt while existing throughout the earth,
Pierrot, and colour is not innate either, and as colour is learnt empirically, and is through experience,
And as primary colour is the way of my life, my primary colour is something I earnt through experience,
Locke, truths which are imprinted on the mind are empirical, and are through sense and induction,
Pierrot, in the same way, truths of the mind, they are through primary colour, and as the primary is essence,
Locke, yeah, and the propositions of our world, they are empirical, and are grounded through the earth,
Pierrot, yeah, and the propositions which I express, they are through my own primary colour,
Locke, yet my man, my faith is something through the earth, and my faith is through experience,
Pierrot, yeah, my faith is through my own primary colour, and this faith of my is through the world,
Locke, and the existence of God, He is something which belongs to our earth, and I learn Him, through both hearing and seeing Himself,
Pierrot, yeah, and I have own skin colour, and this skin colouring, it applies to the existence of God,
Locke, and my virtue for this God, it is through the experience of our world,
Pierrot, and for any man or woman, it is colour which proves a virtue for Him the God,
Locke, and though God might be innate, He is learnt through the experience of our world,
Pierrot, and God is learnt by way of own skin colour, and as colour is the way and the life,
And my knowledge of God is derived through colour, and as well, He is derived through existence,
Locke, and my memory as well, it is through the experience of our world, and is through an a posteriori way,
Pierrot, yeah, and my memory is through colour, and all memory is derived through colour,
Locke, yeah, and pleasure and pain, they both happen through experiencing the life of our world,
Pierrot, yeah, and the pleasure of eating the red tomato, the pleasure is proven through the colour red,
And pain is through colour as well, and as the black widow spider bites, there is pain proven through the colour black,
Locke, and the ideas of my mind, they happen through experience of our world,
Pierrot, yeah, and about the ideas of the mind, they are through colour, and mainly through primary colour,
Locke, and the extension which I see, I will see it as the world,
Pierrot, yeah, and the extension which I see, it is through the secondary way of colour and essence,
Locke, yet, what you say of duration, I say, it happens through the experience of our world,
Pierrot, and while duration happens, all knowledge itself is through colour as it durates as the essence,
Locke, the sun and moon are both known through the experience of our earth, and both are a posteriori,
Pierrot, yeah, and both the sun and moon, they are both derived through secondary colour,
Locke, and yet and about the infinity, it may happen through our plan to migrate the stars and universe,
Pierrot, and through the many galaxies of our universe, I see an infinity of secondary colour,
Locke, as we comment throughout the earth, we see an infinity of time and through the plan of migration,
Pierrot, and the infinity of time, it happens through an infinity of colour and essence,
Locke, and happiness is a pleasure, and is through the experience of our world, and is through essence,
Pierrot, happiness is something bodily, and is always through the primary colour of myself,
Locke, and both good and evil, they happen through the experience of our world, and through way and essence,
Pierrot, and the good and evil which happens through others, it always happens through colour,
Locke, and bodily substance is through an a posteriori as well, and as my body develops through experience,
Pierrot, and bodily substance, it has an essence of colour, and where I am half white for essence,
Locke, and my personal identity, it was developed through an a posteriori way and essence,
Pierrot, yeah, and any personal identity, it will have an essence of primary colour,
Locke, and my consciousness, it has a way through sensing the world, and this is a posteriori,
Pierrot, and in the same way, my consciousness, it happens through experiencing the colour of our world,
Locke, and anything which appears, it may happen through the sense of our world,
Pierrot, yeah, and in the same way, anything which appears is through colour, and as either primary or secondary,
Locke, and the understanding, it happens through the experience of our world, and as the understanding is a posteriori,
Pierrot, and in the same way, the understanding I know, it is through the colour of our world,
Locke, and qualities, they are sensed in an a posteriori way, or through experience,
Pierrot, and in the same way, the qualities which I sense of the world, they are through colour,
And the taste of the red tomato is a quality, and I taste quality of the colour red throughout,
Locke, yeah, and the existence of others, I know them through experience of our earth,
Pierrot, yeah, and the existence of others, I know them through colour, or through primary colour,
DIALOGUE BETWEEN BERKELEY AND PIERROT
Note, in this dialogue, I contrast Berkeley and the a priori, and through my colourist method. And as Berkeley comments of seeing the percipi, I comment of always seeing colour. Either way, the percipi has a foundation of seeing through colour itself, and as colour is for seeing and interpretation.
Berkeley, when I see the world, I see an immaterial way and essence,
Pierrot, and the immaterial which I see, is through colour and essence, and is through perceiving colour,
Berkeley, and when I touch something, I merely touch an idea, and the idea is always immaterial,
Pierrot, and this idea which I touch, is an idea of colour, and when I touch the green grass, I touch the colour green,
Berkeley, and when I smell something, is there anything which I smell, or do I smell an idea which immaterial,
Pierrot, yeah, and when I smell the yellow flower, I smell the colour yellow and as all smells are through colour,
Berkeley, and when I hear something, I must say, I hear merely an idea expressing itself,
Pierrot, yeah, and when I hear the black dog bark, I hear the colour black, and as all hearing is through colour,
Berkeley, and when I taste the chocolate, what I taste is the idea of something,
Pierrot, yeah, and when I taste the chocolate, I taste the colour brown, and as all taste happens through colour,
Berkeley, and through sense of the world, ideas are always perceived in a way,
Pierrot, yeah, and the ideas which I perceive, they always have colour for seeing and essence,
Berkeley, and the ideas, they cannot exist without me perceiving them,
Pierrot, that means, the colour which I see, then the colours cannot exist without me seeing them,
Berkeley, and anything which I see, it will exist as spirit, and through perceiving and sense,
Pierrot, and the spirit way of our world, I see it all through both colour and light,
And you say, that all this colour and spirit does not exist, and without my mind seeing and perceiving,
Berkeley, and extension, it may exist without the mind, and where there is spirit throughout,