Antivaxxers are crazy. That is the perception we all gain from the media, the internet, celebrities, and beyond, writes Bernice Hausman in Anti/Vax, but we need to open our eyes and ears so that we can all have a better conversation about vaccine skepticism and its implications.Hausman argues that the heated debate about vaccinations and whether to get them or not is most often fueled by accusations and vilifications rather than careful attention to the real concerns of many Americans. She wants to set the record straight about vaccine skepticism and show how the issues and ideas that motivate it-like suspicion of pharmaceutical companies or the belief that some illness is necessary to good health-are commonplace in our society.Through Anti/Vax, Hausman wants to engage public health officials, the media, and each of us in a public dialogue about the relation of individual bodily autonomy to the state's responsibility to safeguard citizens' health. We need to know more about the position of each side in this important stand-off so that public decisions are made through understanding rather than stereotyped perceptions of scientifically illiterate antivaxxers or faceless bureaucrats. Hausman reveals that vaccine skepticism is, in part, a critique of medicalization and a warning about the dangers of modern medicine rather than a glib and gullible reaction to scaremongering and misunderstanding.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,7500€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Names: Hausman, Bernice L., author. Title: Anti/vax : reframing the vaccine controversy / Bernice L. Hausman. Description: Ithaca, New York : ILR Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press, 2019. | Series: The culture and politics of health care work | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identiers: LCCN 2018052013 (print) | LCCN 2018052991 (ebook) | ISBN 9781501735639 (pdf) | ISBN 9781501735646 (ret) | ISBN 9781501735622 | ISBN 9781501735622 (cloth ; alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Anti-vaccination movementUnited States. | VaccinationSocial aspectsUnited States. | Vaccination of childrenSocial aspectsUnited States. Classication: LCC RA638 (ebook) | LCC RA638 .H38 2019 (print) | DDC 614.4/7083dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018052013
Conclusion:WhatVaccinationControversyCanTeachUsabout Medicine and Modernity211
Notes221
Bibliography245
Index265
PrefaceandAcknowledgments
WhileIwasworkingonthisbook,oneofmybrotherstookill.Wewere together for a family vacation on Long Island during Labor Day weekend. He had been hiking in California a few weeks earlier, had a low fever and rash, and seemed to recover. Once on the East Coast, he became very sick: lethargic, nauseated, and feverish. He had the chills and shook violently at times. By the time we took him to the emergency room at a local hospital, he was dehydrated and quite wobbly. Wehavelittleexperiencewithseriousillnessinmyfamily.Mybrothersillnessundiagnosed initially despite a full tick panel and tests for other infectious diseaseswas a startling and illuminating experience for some-one writing about vaccination controversy. My brother thought for sure he had West Nile virus disease (and later tests proved him right), as he had encountered unusually large numbers of mosquitoes during his camp-ing trip, but the infectious disease doctors at the hospital didnt think so. Were they just oriented toward ticks because the problem on Long Island is Lyme disease? At dinner one night while he was still in the hospital,