Langue française - Année 1999 - Volume 123 - Numéro 1 - Pages 6-26Marion CAREL, Oswald DUCROT, Paradox in argumentative semantics This paper aims at defining paradox as a mere linguistical notion, indépendant of any cognitive or sociological notion (in particular, « paradox » is distinguished from belief opposite to usually accepted opinions). This definition is given in the framework of the theory of « argumentation in language » , as recently reformulated : the paper second part presents the argumentative notions necessary to define (part 3) « paradox » in this framework. Lastly, the notion is used to characterize sequences of two connected sentences, and lexical words. 21 pages Source : Persée ; Ministère de la jeunesse, de l’éducation nationale et de la recherche, Direction de l’enseignement supérieur, Sous-direction des bibliothèques et de la documentation.
Le problème du paradoxe dans une sémantique argumentative In: Langue française. N°123, 1999. pp. 6-26.
Abstract Marion Carel, Oswald Ducrot, Paradox in argumentative semantics This paper aims at defining paradox as a mere linguistical notion, indépendant of any cognitive or sociological notion (in particular, « paradox » is distinguished from belief opposite to usually accepted opinions). This definition is given in the framework of the theory of « argumentation in language » , as recently reformulated : the paper second part presents the argumentative notions necessary to define (part 3) « paradox » in this framework. Lastly, the notion is used to characterize sequences of two connected sentences, and lexical words.
Citer ce document / Cite this document : Carel Marion, Ducrot Oswald. Le problème du paradoxe dans une sémantique argumentative. In: Langue française. N°123, 1999. pp. 6-26. doi : 10.3406/lfr.1999.6293 http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/lfr_0023-8368_1999_num 123 1 6293 _ _ _