Office of Academic Policies, Procedures and Documentation. 35-38. Center for Research and ..... Sharing between the department, College, VPR, and. Provost.
LOOKING BEYOND THE HORIZON
I may not have gone where I intended to go,
But I think I have ended up where I need to be.
Douglas Adams
Natalia Nevezhkina
Far Eastern State University,
Vladivostok, Russia
This study was made possible through invaluable support of Carnegie Corporation of New York,
IREX (International Research & Exchanges Board), Indiana University Purdue University
Indianapolis, and all the people who work hard to bring excellence to faculty development
program in the multicultural terrain.
1
This case study is the result of my experience working at the Office for Professional
Development at Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis (IUPUI). Over the course of
two months, I work with IUPUI faculty and staff to investigate American higher education
practices to improve faculty teaching and student learning strategies. I wish to express my
particular gratitude to all the people who have participated in hosting me. The enthusiasm and
dedication they devote to their own work has always been contagious.
My deepest appreciation goes to Sharon Hamilton as well as to Nancy Chism, Elizabeth
Rubens, Jackie Singh, Mary Price, Lauren Chism, Terri Tarr, Nelson Soto and to all staff members
of Office for Professional Development for their continued support.
2CONTENTS
page
Introduction 6
Section 1 7-9
Forces Driving Educational change in Global Community 7-8
Divergent Views about the Purposes of College 9
Section 2 10-25
Case study premises and methods 10
Brief History of the University 10-11
IUPUI Mission Statement 11
Goals for Implementing IUPUI Mission Statement 11-21
Comparison of Federal and state Goal 22-23
Comparison of State, IUPUI and OPD Collective Goals 24-25
Section 3 26-31
Office for Professional Development 26
OPD Organizational Chart 2000 27
OPD Organizational Chart 2004-2005 28
OPD Organizational Chart November, 2006 29
OPD Infrastructure Revision 30
OPD Mission 30
IUPUI Goals-IUPUI Collective Goals 31
Section 4 32-66
OPD IUPUI Today 32-33
OPD Advisory Committee 33
Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs- Dr. Hamilton 33
Administrative Unit of OPD IUPUI 33-35
Office of Academic Policies, Procedures and Documentation 35-38
Center for Research and Development 38-48
Scholarly and Creative Activity Program 38-42
Associate Faculty Office 42-43
Office for Multicultural Professional development 43-45
Office for Women 45-47
Organizational development 47-48
Center on Integrated Learning 48-52
Principles of Undergraduate Learning 48
Center for Research and Learning 52-53
3Center for Teaching and Learning 53-62
Instructional Design and Development 60-61
Instructional Technology 61
Information Resources Unit 61-62
Center for Service and Learning 62-66
Section 5 66-68
OPD Support by Unit 2005-2006 67
OPD Funding Inclusive of Support by Other Units 2006-2007 68
Implications and Conclusions 69-82
Appendix 1 83
Appendix 2 83-88
Appendix 3 88-110
4ABBREVIATIONS
1. OPD - Office for Professional Development
2. IUPUI- Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
3. FESU- Far Eastern State University, Vladivostok
4. POD – Professional and Development Network in Higher Education
5. TESOL
6. GPPA- Guaranteed Professional Program Admission
7. AVC- Associate Vice Chancellor
8. APPD- Office of Academic Policies, Procedures and Documentation
9. ePort- electronic Portfolio
10. AFO- Associate Faculty Office
11. FACET- The Indiana University Faculty Colloquium on Excellence in Teaching
12. COIL- Center on Integrated Learning
13. PULs – Principles of Undergraduate Learning
14. TLCs- Themed Learning Communities
15. SoTL- Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
16. IU- Indiana University
17. IUB- Indiana University, Bloomington
18. CoP – Communities of Practice
19. CRL- Center for Research and Learning
20. UROP- Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program
21. SROP- Summer Research Opportunities
22. IUURC- Indiana University Undergraduate Research Conference
23. CSL- Center for service and Learning
24. COPC- Community Outreach Partnership Center
25. CTL- Center for Teaching and Learning
26. IDD- Instructional Design and Development
27. IT- Instructional technology
28. IR- Information resources
29.NINFD- New Faculty Developers
30. CLN- Community Learning Network
31. COS- Community of Science
32. SCAP- Scholarly and Creative Activity Program
33. LEC- Learning Environment Committee
34. AOD- Advocacy administrative Development
35. OMPD- Office for Multicultural Professional Development
36. DRF- Diverse Researchers Forum
37. OW- Office for Women
38. PFF- Preparing Future Faculty Program
5INTRODUCTION
From the earliest days, the United States of America have valued education. Today the
tradition continues. There are more than 600 public and 1,700 private, four-year colleges and
universities, as well as “proprietary schools”.
Education is primarily a state and local responsibility. However, the federal government
plays an important role in affecting education policy.
U.S. Congress, U.S. Department of Education are enacting the traditions of Founding
Fathers to create the finest system for teaching and learning by means of legislature acts and
programs that guideline the major issues within the system.. One of the major activities of the
U.S. Department of Education is to help identify approaches, ideas and successful teaching
techniques.
Colleges and universities are knowledge-driven institutions, but with a history and culture
unlike other organizations. Faculty drives university teaching, research, and service with a level
of self-direction and independence foreign to employees in most other organizational settings.
An important challenge for the institution is the need to balance that faculty self-direction and
independence with the institution’s mission, vision and strategies.
So, how and why were the new vistas within the educational system of the U.S.
discovered or what triggered the development of a huge network of educators working on
promoting excellence and efficiency in higher education? What are the results and practical
impact on the excellence and efficiency of teaching and learning?
This topic is highly important for the Russian system of Higher education, though the systems
are different. Today the Far Eastern Sate University thrives for excellence and efficiency, and
determines as the Mission statement key aims the following issues:
• Vision of human civilization development perspectives, advancement ahead of
today in the University's activities;
• Ensuring quality of education corresponding to the highest international standards;
• Permanent development of fundamental and applied sciences as a vital prerequisite of
quality education;
• Internationalization of education, research, and culture, integration into the worldwide
educational, research, and cultural environment;
• Constant development and implementation of advanced information technologies into
education, research, and various areas of world community's activities;
• Protection and development of moral and cultural values of human society;
• Forming moral, highly intellectual and physically healthy individuals with honor, abilities
1and will to lead, win and promote prosperity of humankind.
Thus, having the hallmark opportunity to provide my home university with an experience of the
best expertise I am going to investigate the strategic goals and their realization within the
framework of my observations while being hosted by OPD IUPUI Fall 2006.
1 www.dvgu.ru
6Section 1.
2Forces Driving Educational Change in Global Community
Premise: Educational institutions do not exist in a vacuum. They are influenced by societal
events constantly occurring around them. These varying societal events are forcing educational
institutions to change.
Demographics:
Older students are attending at much higher rates
Academic delivery for older students must accommodate their outside obligations
Students are working part-time while enrolled in full-time programs
Higher proportion of high school graduates
Students lacking recommended college preparatory curricula
Greater percentage of non-traditional students
More cultural diversity with higher minority participation
Economic Pressures:
Enrollment and operating costs increase while funding decreases
When tuition is too high, students will seek less expensive alternatives
Development in the Workplace:
Employers seeking technology and information literate employees
Workers are required to be knowledgeable about information access, problem solving, analysis,
evaluation, team work, adaptability, and decision-making
Rapid change and uncertainty cause employers to seek workers already equipped with the
necessary skills
Learners need frequent short-term updating as required skills change
More part-time workers require more flexible access to education
The growth of knowledge is inhibiting individuals’ ability to remain current, with an emphasis
on the ability to access, rather than memorize, information
Need for high-level intellectual skills
Competition:
Private business’ practice of offering short, inexpensive market-specific training