District Comparison of Benchmark Status Reading-ethnicity
4 pages
English
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

District Comparison of Benchmark Status Reading-ethnicity

-

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres
4 pages
English

Description

DISTRICT REPORTComparison of Benchmark/CIM Status by Ethnic Group - Whole GroupREADING 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-082005-06 Benchmark Status 2006-07 Benchmark Status 2007-08 Benchmark StatusGrade and Ethnic Group Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low TotalGrade 3 N 21 37 4 7 0 69 17 31 7 6 0 61 18 28 0 4 1 51 American Indian/Alaskan Native % 30% 54% 6% 10% 0% 28% 51% 11% 10% 0% 35% 55% 0% 8% 2%N 159 178 22 17 8 384 127 168 21 27 5 348 126 168 20 29 4 347 Asian / Pacific Islander % 41% 46% 6% 4% 2% 36% 48% 6% 8% 1% 36% 48% 6% 8% 1%N 175 295 32 21 8 531 122 268 58 66 18 532 123 278 45 68 13 527 Black (Not of Hispanic Origin) % 33% 56% 6% 4% 2% 23% 50% 11% 12% 3% 23% 53% 9% 13% 2%N 122 256 46 34 14 472 74 256 60 80 17 487 106 273 67 49 17 512 Hispanic % 26% 54% 10% 7% 3% 15% 53% 12% 16% 3% 21% 53% 13% 10% 3%N 1189 553 67 28 13 1850 972 729 75 64 23 1863 1084 586 55 59 17 1801 White (Not of Hispanic Origin) % 64% 30% 4% 2% 1% 52% 39% 4% 3% 1% 60% 33% 3% 3% 1%N 42 37 2 7 1 89Multi-Ethnic % 47% 42% 2% 8% 1%N 13800 0 21 29 16 3 3 0 51 23 23 1 1 2 50Unknown / Unspecified % 62% 38% 0% 0% 0% 57% 31% 6% 6% 0% 46% 46% 2% 2% 4%Grade 4 N 18 41 3 3 1 66 12 38 6 7 1 64 14 27 4 5 1 51 American Indian/Alaskan Native % 27% 62% 5% 5% 2% 19% 59% 9% 11% 2% 27% 53% 8% 10% 2%N 127 204 18 19 3 371 126 187 46 27 5 391 146 146 38 14 4 348 Asian / Pacific Islander % 34% 55% 5% 5% 1% 32% 48% 12% 7% 1% 42% ...

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 14
Langue English

Exrait

Total Exceeds
Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status by Ethnic Group - Whole Group
READING
2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08
Total
Exceeds Meets
Near
2005-06 Benchmark Status
Low Very Low
Meets
Near
Low Very Low
Exceeds Meets
Near
Low Very Low Total
2006-07 Benchmark Status
2007-08 Benchmark Status
DISTRICT REPORT
Grade and Ethnic Group
N
%
21
4
0
37
7
30%
6%
0%
54%
10%
17
7
0
31
6
28%
11%
0%
51%
10%
18
0
1
28
4
35%
0%
2%
55%
8%
69
61
51
Grade 3
American Indian/Alaskan Native
N
%
159
22
8
178
17
41%
6%
2%
46%
4%
127
21
5
168
27
36%
6%
1%
48%
8%
126
20
4
168
29
36%
6%
1%
48%
8%
384
348
347
Asian / Pacific Islander
N
%
175
32
8
295
21
33%
6%
2%
56%
4%
122
58
18
268
66
23%
11%
3%
50%
12%
123
45
13
278
68
23%
9%
2%
53%
13%
531
532
527
Black (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
122
46
14
256
34
26%
10%
3%
54%
7%
74
60
17
256
80
15%
12%
3%
53%
16%
106
67
17
273
49
21%
13%
3%
53%
10%
472
487
512
Hispanic
N
%
1189
67
13
553
28
64%
4%
1%
30%
2%
972
75
23
729
64
52%
4%
1%
39%
3%
1084
55
17
586
59
60%
3%
1%
33%
3%
1850
1863
1801
White (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
42
2
1
37
7
47%
2%
1%
42%
8%
89
Multi-Ethnic
N
%
13
0
0
8
0
62%
0%
0%
38%
0%
29
3
0
16
3
57%
6%
0%
31%
6%
23
1
2
23
1
46%
2%
4%
46%
2%
21
51
50
Unknown / Unspecified
N
%
18
3
1
41
3
27%
5%
2%
62%
5%
12
6
1
38
7
19%
9%
2%
59%
11%
14
4
1
27
5
27%
8%
2%
53%
10%
66
64
51
Grade 4
American Indian/Alaskan Native
N
%
127
18
3
204
19
34%
5%
1%
55%
5%
126
46
5
187
27
32%
12%
1%
48%
7%
146
38
4
146
14
42%
11%
1%
42%
4%
371
391
348
Asian / Pacific Islander
N
%
106
32
19
363
30
19%
6%
3%
66%
5%
118
83
17
270
39
22%
16%
3%
51%
7%
127
63
16
255
43
25%
13%
3%
51%
9%
550
527
504
Black (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
86
40
15
255
28
20%
9%
4%
60%
7%
89
73
24
239
58
18%
15%
5%
49%
12%
94
55
7
234
60
21%
12%
2%
52%
13%
424
483
450
Hispanic
N
%
1041
68
14
787
34
54%
3%
1%
40%
2%
1015
107
23
599
61
56%
6%
1%
33%
3%
1099
73
13
584
62
60%
4%
1%
32%
3%
1944
1805
1831
White (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
44
4
3
41
3
46%
4%
3%
43%
3%
95
Multi-Ethnic
N
%
9
2
1
5
1
50%
11%
6%
28%
6%
13
2
1
8
2
50%
8%
4%
31%
8%
21
4
1
13
1
53%
10%
3%
33%
3%
18
26
40
Unknown / Unspecified
Note:
Because of problems with the state's computer-based assessment system (TESA) in early 2007, testing on it was discontinued and most students took paper-pencil tests in May.
Students who met state standards on
TESA between January and March were not retested in May.
Many of those students might have exceeded state standards and had higher test scores had they been retested.
Readers should keep this situation in mind
when reviewing reports showing percent Exceeding in 2006-07 or test score gains from 2005-06.
Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year.
It became harder for students to meet Reading and Math standards at grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and, in Reading only, grade 7.
It became easier to meet
Reading and Math standards at grades 10 and, in Math only, grade 8.
The grade 7 Math and grade 8 Reading standard did not change.
Research, Evaluation & Assessment—08/08/08gw(2008-0115)
Page 1 of 4
Total Exceeds
Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status by Ethnic Group - Whole Group
READING
2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08
Total
Exceeds Meets
Near
2005-06 Benchmark Status
Low Very Low
Meets
Near
Low Very Low
Exceeds Meets
Near
Low Very Low Total
2006-07 Benchmark Status
2007-08 Benchmark Status
DISTRICT REPORT
Grade and Ethnic Group
N
%
18
8
3
51
4
21%
10%
4%
61%
5%
9
1
5
0
39
6
13%
22%
0%
57%
9%
12
13
1
26
7
20%
22%
2%
44%
12%
84
69
59
Grade 5
American Indian/Alaskan Native
N
%
97
24
5
203
16
28%
7%
1%
59%
5%
80
78
5
159
35
22%
22%
1%
45%
10%
93
64
3
183
17
26%
18%
1%
51%
5%
345
357
360
Asian / Pacific Islander
N
%
70
74
19
348
57
12%
13%
3%
61%
10%
41
158
21
245
75
8%
29%
4%
45%
14%
47
141
17
235
51
10%
29%
3%
48%
10%
568
540
491
Black (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
43
69
19
267
45
10%
16%
4%
60%
10%
48
113
21
172
69
11%
27%
5%
41%
16%
53
119
16
221
53
11%
26%
3%
48%
11%
443
423
462
Hispanic
N
%
804
94
24
939
46
42%
5%
1%
49%
2%
755
171
19
858
89
40%
9%
1%
45%
5%
816
147
11
716
67
46%
8%
1%
41%
4%
1907
1892
1757
White (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
19
13
0
53
8
20%
14%
0%
57%
9%
93
Multi-Ethnic
N
%
5
3
1
5
0
36%
21%
7%
36%
0%
9
1
0
12
1
39%
4%
0%
52%
4%
10
2
2
10
2
38%
8%
8%
38%
8%
14
23
26
Unknown / Unspecified
N
%
18
11
1
37
4
25%
15%
1%
52%
6%
15
13
2
52
5
17%
15%
2%
60%
6%
13
10
0
34
1
22%
17%
0%
59%
2%
71
87
58
Grade 6
American Indian/Alaskan Native
N
%
107
17
1
170
25
33%
5%
0%
53%
8%
91
35
4
179
20
28%
11%
1%
54%
6%
108
55
3
162
13
32%
16%
1%
48%
4%
320
329
341
Asian / Pacific Islander
N
%
75
74
5
267
79
15%
15%
1%
53%
16%
68
125
21
267
54
13%
23%
4%
50%
10%
57
134
13
267
53
11%
26%
2%
51%
10%
500
535
524
Black (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
61
38
11
205
72
16%
10%
3%
53%
19%
68
96
24
197
55
15%
22%
5%
45%
13%
53
98
7
197
43
13%
25%
2%
49%
11%
387
440
398
Hispanic
N
%
850
79
14
724
100
48%
4%
1%
41%
6%
777
164
15
802
75
42%
9%
1%
44%
4%
879
145
7
712
65
49%
8%
0%
39%
4%
1767
1833
1808
White (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
21
17
2
32
3
28%
23%
3%
43%
4%
75
Multi-Ethnic
N
%
4
2
0
9
1
25%
13%
0%
56%
6%
9
3
0
6
2
45%
15%
0%
30%
10%
12
1
0
8
3
50%
4%
0%
33%
13%
16
20
24
Unknown / Unspecified
Note:
Because of problems with the state's computer-based assessment system (TESA) in early 2007, testing on it was discontinued and most students took paper-pencil tests in May.
Students who met state standards on
TESA between January and March were not retested in May.
Many of those students might have exceeded state standards and had higher test scores had they been retested.
Readers should keep this situation in mind
when reviewing reports showing percent Exceeding in 2006-07 or test score gains from 2005-06.
Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year.
It became harder for students to meet Reading and Math standards at grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and, in Reading only, grade 7.
It became easier to meet
Reading and Math standards at grades 10 and, in Math only, grade 8.
The grade 7 Math and grade 8 Reading standard did not change.
Research, Evaluation & Assessment—08/08/08gw(2008-0115)
Page 2 of 4
Total Exceeds
Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status by Ethnic Group - Whole Group
READING
2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08
Total
Exceeds Meets
Near
2005-06 Benchmark Status
Low Very Low
Meets
Near
Low Very Low
Exceeds Meets
Near
Low Very Low Total
2006-07 Benchmark Status
2007-08 Benchmark Status
DISTRICT REPORT
Grade and Ethnic Group
N
%
20
9
0
31
4
31%
14%
0%
48%
6%
9
1
4
1
36
5
14%
22%
2%
55%
8%
16
16
0
32
4
24%
24%
0%
47%
6%
64
65
68
Grade 7
American Indian/Alaskan Native
N
%
140
50
0
139
16
41%
14%
0%
40%
5%
113
38
2
153
12
36%
12%
1%
48%
4%
122
46
1
145
15
37%
14%
0%
44%
5%
345
318
329
Asian / Pacific Islander
N
%
119
118
9
227
53
23%
22%
2%
43%
10%
77
123
11
253
39
15%
24%
2%
50%
8%
64
148
5
252
46
12%
29%
1%
49%
9%
526
503
515
Black (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
74
94
11
148
74
18%
23%
3%
37%
18%
67
94
6
180
47
17%
24%
2%
46%
12%
69
114
1
182
37
17%
28%
0%
45%
9%
401
394
403
Hispanic
N
%
1158
151
17
536
68
60%
8%
1%
28%
4%
861
141
4
656
58
50%
8%
0%
38%
3%
928
152
3
681
42
51%
8%
0%
38%
2%
1930
1720
1806
White (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
26
19
0
38
4
30%
22%
0%
44%
5%
87
Multi-Ethnic
N
%
4
2
0
8
1
27%
13%
0%
53%
7%
7
2
0
8
2
37%
11%
0%
42%
11%
13
5
0
9
0
48%
19%
0%
33%
0%
15
19
27
Unknown / Unspecified
N
%
14
16
0
27
8
22%
25%
0%
42%
12%
5
7
1
44
14
7%
10%
1%
62%
20%
5
1
2
1
20
7
11%
27%
2%
44%
16%
65
71
45
Grade 8
American Indian/Alaskan Native
N
%
114
66
1
129
20
35%
20%
0%
39%
6%
75
37
7
194
28
22%
11%
2%
57%
8%
87
51
2
149
27
28%
16%
1%
47%
9%
330
341
316
Asian / Pacific Islander
N
%
65
151
17
206
86
12%
29%
3%
39%
16%
49
100
26
242
105
9%
19%
5%
46%
20%
43
137
12
188
93
9%
29%
3%
40%
20%
525
522
473
Black (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
47
103
7
132
87
13%
27%
2%
35%
23%
37
78
25
181
86
9%
19%
6%
44%
21%
45
110
7
150
75
12%
28%
2%
39%
19%
376
407
387
Hispanic
N
%
969
228
16
614
119
50%
12%
1%
32%
6%
685
173
20
890
113
36%
9%
1%
47%
6%
737
191
16
653
72
44%
11%
1%
39%
4%
1946
1881
1669
White (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
21
4
0
36
7
31%
6%
0%
53%
10%
68
Multi-Ethnic
N
%
2
1
0
6
0
22%
11%
0%
67%
0%
2
1
0
10
4
12%
6%
0%
59%
24%
4
6
0
9
5
17%
25%
0%
38%
21%
9
1
7
2
4
Unknown / Unspecified
Note:
Because of problems with the state's computer-based assessment system (TESA) in early 2007, testing on it was discontinued and most students took paper-pencil tests in May.
Students who met state standards on
TESA between January and March were not retested in May.
Many of those students might have exceeded state standards and had higher test scores had they been retested.
Readers should keep this situation in mind
when reviewing reports showing percent Exceeding in 2006-07 or test score gains from 2005-06.
Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year.
It became harder for students to meet Reading and Math standards at grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and, in Reading only, grade 7.
It became easier to meet
Reading and Math standards at grades 10 and, in Math only, grade 8.
The grade 7 Math and grade 8 Reading standard did not change.
Research, Evaluation & Assessment—08/08/08gw(2008-0115)
Page 3 of 4
Total Exceeds
Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status by Ethnic Group - Whole Group
READING
2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08
Total
Exceeds Meets
Near
2005-06 Benchmark Status
Low Very Low
Meets
Near
Low Very Low
Exceeds Meets
Near
Low Very Low Total
2006-07 Benchmark Status
2007-08 Benchmark Status
DISTRICT REPORT
Grade and Ethnic Group
N
%
4
2
2
3
26
20
5%
29%
4%
35%
27%
9
1
5
0
22
19
14%
23%
0%
34%
29%
5
8
1
21
20
9%
15%
2%
38%
36%
75
65
55
Grade 10
American Indian/Alaskan Native
N
%
54
87
9
118
60
16%
27%
3%
36%
18%
46
35
9
131
75
16%
12%
3%
44%
25%
37
61
1
155
48
12%
20%
0%
51%
16%
328
296
302
Asian / Pacific Islander
N
%
23
167
26
103
134
5%
37%
6%
23%
30%
30
80
18
158
199
6%
16%
4%
33%
41%
12
102
17
150
194
3%
21%
4%
32%
41%
453
485
475
Black (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
10
103
9
68
101
3%
35%
3%
23%
35%
20
65
8
119
117
6%
20%
2%
36%
36%
11
53
7
132
103
4%
17%
2%
43%
34%
291
329
306
Hispanic
N
%
517
397
33
792
229
26%
20%
2%
40%
12%
513
203
15
875
206
28%
11%
1%
48%
11%
484
174
10
839
188
29%
10%
1%
49%
11%
1968
1812
1695
White (Not of Hispanic Origin)
N
%
10
4
0
31
14
17%
7%
0%
53%
24%
59
Multi-Ethnic
N
%
5
2
0
4
1
42%
17%
0%
33%
8%
5
3
0
14
5
19%
11%
0%
52%
19%
2
4
0
10
2
11%
22%
0%
56%
11%
12
27
18
Unknown / Unspecified
Note:
Because of problems with the state's computer-based assessment system (TESA) in early 2007, testing on it was discontinued and most students took paper-pencil tests in May.
Students who met state standards on
TESA between January and March were not retested in May.
Many of those students might have exceeded state standards and had higher test scores had they been retested.
Readers should keep this situation in mind
when reviewing reports showing percent Exceeding in 2006-07 or test score gains from 2005-06.
Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year.
It became harder for students to meet Reading and Math standards at grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and, in Reading only, grade 7.
It became easier to meet
Reading and Math standards at grades 10 and, in Math only, grade 8.
The grade 7 Math and grade 8 Reading standard did not change.
Research, Evaluation & Assessment—08/08/08gw(2008-0115)
Page 4 of 4